or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and - that the respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2000-10-13 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark "JAL". 5.3 The Respondents have no right or legitimate interest in the domain name. In this respect, the...
2000-09-04 - Case Details
not file a Response to the Complaint. 6. Discussion and Findings Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Name 6.1. In relation to the domain name...
2000-10-24 - Case Details
confusingly similar to Complainant�s FLUMINENSE mark, because: Being the Complainant the title holder of the mark "FLUMINENSE", registered in Brazil, in...
2000-10-26 - Case Details
Complainant must prove the presence of each of the following elements: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar...
2000-10-18 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. 6.2 Domain name identical or confusingly similar to the Complainants� Marks The domain name in dispute is " bettinaliano.com...
2000-10-24 - Case Details
the Complaint. 6. Discussion and Findings Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Names 6.1. In relation to both of the domain names "harveynorman.net...
2000-09-27 - Case Details
of goods or services quite different from those in relation to which the Complainant�s trademark is registered. Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain...
2000-09-28 - Case Details
each of the following: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2000-11-16 - Case Details
with a claim for transfer of a domain name, namely; - that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2001-01-11 - Case Details
prove the presence of each of the following elements: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2001-03-09 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark. A detailed analysis of the Canadian case law on confusion in the trademark context is set out in the...
2001-07-31 - Case Details
elements are that: (i) Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and...
2001-07-25 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings Domain Name is Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant�s Mark 6.1. In relation to the domain name , the relevant part of this...
2001-09-10 - Case Details
are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2001-06-05 - Case Details
registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) That the Respondent...
2001-06-01 - Case Details
name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. The addition of another letter “N” does not change the way in which the word is pronounced...
2006-02-14 - Case Details
round of submissions. The Panel will therefore proceed to a decision based on the Complaint and the Response. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Several...
2005-10-28 - Case Details
finding that the Domain Name of the Respondent has to be transferred to the Complainant: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2005-04-15 - Case Details
confusingly similar. 2. The Complainant has never authorized the Respondent to use its marks, and the Respondent has never been commonly known by any phrase...
2014-06-25 - Case Details