and changing the plural to the singular, and is therefore confusingly similar. 2. The following is the Complainant's argument in full under paragraph 4...
2014-06-25 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy must be proven. Since paragraph 4(a)(i) requires Complainant to prove that the disputed domain name “is identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights,” and such rights have not been proven here, the Panel need not address any...
2012-11-09 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s RIMMEL marks, and the Complainant’s evidence demonstrates beyond...
2014-01-30 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant asserts rights in the CASHIES trade mark and alleges that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the...
2015-03-02 - Case Details
Panel decides not to accept the Supplemental Fillings submitted by the Complainant. D. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is the holder of...
2013-06-07 - Case Details
the Complainant has engaged in reverse domain name hijacking. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has...
2011-12-19 - Case Details
Respondent’s geographical area in order to try and support its claim. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns a...
2012-05-04 - Case Details
of this proceeding under the Policy in favour of one of the parties. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has...
2012-04-03 - Case Details
Complainant’s Supplemental Filing or Respondent’s second Response and will take no account of them in its decision. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2012-03-16 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration which predate by many years the date...
2011-03-09 - Case Details
thereto; this fact alone is sufficient to conclude that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant's FORTUNEO trademark.” Confédération Nationale...
2010-05-14 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the Respondent lacks rights or a legitimate interest in the domain name, and that the...
2015-10-15 - Case Details
the website at the disputed domain name. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Second Complainant has demonstrated that it owns a registered...
2016-06-21 - Case Details
reply to Complainant's contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has shown to the satisfaction of the Panel...
2017-01-03 - Case Details
been necessary, the Panel would have concluded that the Domain Name was for the purposes of the Policy confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the...
2015-12-10 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has rights in the mark DELTA SONIC by virtue of its continuous use of the mark in US interstate commerce...
2015-12-07 - Case Details
grievance. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar Turning to the merits, Complainant has established the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy...
2009-04-09 - Case Details
as one element to be proved, that the domain name be identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights...
2009-02-20 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar . Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy has been satisfied. Complainant has two federally-registered United States...
2008-02-09 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical with a trademark in which the Complainant has rights, as the disputed domain name incorporates...
2008-01-22 - Case Details