In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5,
the due date for Response was July 15, 2025. The Response was f iled with the Center on June 25, 2025.
The Complainant submitted a supplemental f iling on June 27, 2025, and the Respondent submitted a
supplemental f iling on that same day.
...No exceptional
circumstances are shown by the Complainant for the need for this supplemental f iling. The Respondent’s
supplemental f iling continues the debate.
The Panel declines to admit both supplemental f ilings.
...
2025-07-31 - Case Details
Through its licensees, af f iliates, and member companies,
Complainant has used its PRINCIPAL marks in connection with a variety of products and services in the
f inancial, insurance, investment, banking, asset management, retirement, real estate, and healthcare f ields
since as early as 1985. ...Respondent’s use of the Domain Name to
imitate Complainant, to display ads competitive to Complainant, and to send and receive email likely in
furtherance of f inancial f raud, is not a bona f ide of fering of goods or services.
- Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name, which evinces a lack of rights or legitimate
interests. ...
2025-05-16 - Case Details
Därutöver gav Innehavaren den 8 september 2023 in en ansökan om ändring av f irma f rån SVMV Sverige
AB, som Bolagsverket, ef ter f lera avslag på förslag till f irmor innehållande ”Matvärlden” på grund av
förväxlingsrisk, registrerade Matvärlden Stockholm AB. ...Under mars 2023
tecknade Innehavaren ett samarbetsavtal. Av avtalet f ramgår att verksamheten kommer att utöka sin
grossistverksamhet till marknadsföring av f rukt och f isk under år 2024.
...
2023-12-13 - Case Details
Specifically, the panel found, “Complainant provides no evidence of
association of ‘firestore’ or ‘the f irestore’ uniquely or primarily with Complainant, and the Panel’s cursory
investigation of the term indicates that ‘f irestore,’ as one word or two, is commonly used by many other
vendors of products to f iref ighters and for many other f ields, particularly f irearms.” ...The Panel
f inds that this is one of those cases because any f inding concerning the second element is inextricably
intertwined with a f inding as to the third element.
...
2024-03-11 - Case Details
On June 3, 2025, the Complainant submitted a supplemental f iling. On June 4, 2025, the
Respondent submitted a supplemental f iling. On June 16, 2025, the Complainant submitted a second
supplemental f iling.
...The Complainant has shown rights in respect of a trademark or service mark, the registered semi-f igurative
PASINO mark, for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.2.1.
The Panel f inds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. ...
2025-06-27 - Case Details
Considering a) the second disputed domain name was registered af ter the commencement of the
proceeding, b) it has the same naming pattern as the f irst disputed domain name, and has an active MX
server which carries a risk that it may be used for f raudulent purposes as the f irst disputed domain name,
and c) the Respondent has raised no objection to the Complainant’s request, the Panel finds that it would be
practical, fair, and ef f icient to allow the Complainant to add the second disputed domain name to this
proceeding. ...Under such circumstances, the addition of other terms (whether descriptive, geographical,
pejorative, meaningless, or otherwise) would not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity under the f irst
element (cf. section 1.8 of the WIPO Overview 3.0). ...
2023-11-30 - Case Details
The Complainant claims that it owns the domain names , ,
, , f .co.uk>, f .eu>, f .eu>,
, f .eu>, f .net>, f .com>, f -group.com>, f -group.eu>,
f -group.f r>, f -group.net> and f -group.us>.
...The Panel also ignored the gTLD extension “.com” since it is viewed as a standard registration requirement
and suggested as disregarded under the f irst element similarity test. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...
2025-09-11 - Case Details
Since March 18, 1986, ADM (Registration No. 1386430) has been registered in
the United States for the following goods and services with a f irst use date at least as early as 1923 (see
Annex 9):
- Class 01: Chemicals for industrial use, namely, ethyl alcohol; ground corn cobs for use in further
manufacture
- Class 04: Industrial oils for use in chemicals and paints made f rom cottonseeds, sunf lower seeds,
soybeans, f laxseeds, corn germ and f ish
- Class 12: Barges, vans and railway cars...In the present case, the Panel notes that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name and sent
f raudulent communications associated with that domain name, solely to commit f raud and further their illicit
scheme, by impersonating a legitimate ADM employee. ...
2025-04-14 - Case Details
D2024-4398 (f inding the addition of an “s” and “corp” to did not prevent the f inding of
confusing similarity); Archer- Daniels-Midland Company v. ...Abbvie Inc., WIPO Case No. D2024-0737
(f inding inclusion of “-project” in not sufficient to prevent a f inding of confusing similarity);
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. ...
2025-08-15 - Case Details
The Panel has not received any requests f rom the Complainant or the Respondent regarding further
submissions, waivers or extensions of deadlines, and the Panel has not found it necessary to request any
further information f rom the Parties.
...Moreover, the Panel f inds that the composition of the disputed domain name carries a risk of implied
af f iliation as it ef fectively impersonates or suggests sponsorship or endorsement by the Complainant.
...
2023-12-20 - Case Details
The Panel has not received any requests f rom the Complainant or the Respondents regarding further
submissions, waivers or extensions of deadlines, and the Panel has not found it necessary to request any
further information f rom the Parties.
...Respondents
The Respondents have made no reply to the Complainant’s contentions and are in default. In reference to
paragraphs 5(f) and 14 of the Rules, no exceptional circumstances explaining the default have been put
forward or are apparent f rom the record.
...
2024-02-26 - Case Details
On December 8,
2023, the Respondent submitted an unsolicited supplemental f iling in response to the f irst of the
Complainant’s such f ilings.
4. Factual Background
The Complainant is a company registered in Switzerland. ...Parties’ Contentions
The Parties’ contentions summarized below are based on the Parties original Complaint and Response f iled
respectively in the proceeding and do not take account of the Complainant’s f irst unsolicited supplemental
f iling, to which further reference is made below, or any subsequent unsolicited supplemental f iling received
f rom either Party.
...
2024-01-03 - Case Details
As stated in section 1.8 of WIPO
Overview 3.0, “where the relevant trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name, the addition
of other terms (whether descriptive, geographical, pejorative, meaningless, or otherwise) would not prevent a
f inding of confusing similarity under the f irst element”. Thus, the addition of the term “f ins” to the
Complainant’s FUTURES Mark in the Disputed Domain Name does not prevent a f inding of confusing
similarity. ...Based on the available record, the Panel f inds that the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name. ...
2025-12-05 - Case Details
On April 24, 2025, the Respondent submitted a supplemental f iling to the Center in response to the
unsolicited supplemental f iling by the Complainant.
4. ...In the present case, however, the Panel considers a f inding of reverse domain name hijacking is appropriate.
First, the Complainant was already engaged in litigation with the Respondent before f iling the Complaint.
...
2025-05-22 - Case Details
Complainant also owns the domain name incorporating the MOELIS Mark as its principal domain name,
, created on April 27, 2000, thorough which consumers access Complainant’s of f icial website
located at “www.moelis.com” (the “Of f icial MOELIS Website”).
The disputed domain name was created on August 3, 2023. ...The Panel f inds Respondent is passing itself
of f to misappropriate the goodwill developed in Complainant’s rights in the MOELIS Mark by operating a
website with the intent to mislead Internet users into thinking Respondent is Complainant or at a minimum
there is an af f iliation between Complainant and Respondent. ...
2023-10-16 - Case Details
The Response also includes evidence that the Respondent, or his company Ultramade Nutrition &
Beverages (FZE), has registered trademarks as follows:
(1) UAE Registered Trademark No 393924, C5 (f igurative), f iled on March 13, 2023 and registered on
January 30, 2024 in International Class 32 for Beer, mineral and sparkling waters and other non-alcoholic
beverages, fruit drinks and fruit juices, energy drinks, syrups and other preparations for making beverages;
(2) UAE Registered Trademark No 416778, C5energy.com C5energy.ae, filed on February 13, 2024 and
registered on October 17, 2024 in International Class 45 for Domain name registration and protection;
(3) UAE Registered Trademark No 420207, C5 (f igurative), f iled on March 30, 2023 and registered on
August 7, 2024 in International Class 35 for Advertising services, business management and direction, and
of f ice activity activation;
(4) UAE Registered Trademark No 416028, C5 (figurative), filed on February 1, 2024 and registered on
November 16, 2024 in International Class 5 for Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, sanitary
preparations for medical purposes, dietetic substances and foodstuf fs for medical or veterinary use and
foodstuffs for infants and children, dietary supplements for humans and animals; plasters and dressings,
dental f illing materials and dental wax, disinfectants, preparations for the extermination of insects and
vermin, fungicides and herbicides;
(5) UAE Registered Trademark No 426986, C5 ENERGY.COM (f igurative), f iled on July 13, 2024 and
registered on November 19, 2024 in International Class 35 for Advertising and business management and
administration services;
(6) Qatar Registered Trademark No 174575, C5 SUPERCHARGE (figurative), registered on January 26,
2025 in International Class 32 for Beer, mineral and sparkling waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, fruit
drinks and f ruit juices, energy drinks, syrups and other preparations for making beverages;
(7) Algerian Registered Trademark No 135247, C5 EXTREME (figurative), registered from June 27, 2024
in International Class 5;
(8) Djibouti Registered Trademark No DJ/M/2023/296, C5 EXTREME (f igurative), registered f rom
November 6, 2023 in International Class 32 for Beer and other beverages;
(9) Syrian Arab Republic Registered Trademark No 180083, C5 (f igurative), registered f rom August 11,
2024 in International Class 5;
(10) Yemen Registered Trademark No 115364, C5 (f igurative), registered f rom December 16, 2023 in
International Class 5;
page 4
(11) Saudi Arabia Registered Trademark No TM-01-00-01038-24, C5 SUPERCHARGE (f igurative),
registered f rom January 12, 2024 in International Class 32;
(12) Syrian Arab Republic Registered Trademark No181428, C5 SUPERCHARGE (f igurative), registered
f rom January 28, 2024 in International Class 32; and
(13) Bahrain Registered Trademark No 144398, C5 (f igurative), registered f rom September 11, 2024 in
International Class 32 for Beer and other beverages.
The Respondent’s company also has a pending application for C5 (f igurative) in the United States, Serial No
97835636, which was f iled on March 13, 2023. That application, however, has been suspended since
June 3, 2024 following notice of objection based on the Complainant’s prior trademarks.
...
2025-04-14 - Case Details
In these circumstances, the Panel considers it appropriate to
admit the Complainant’s unsolicited supplemental f iling.
It is also appropriate to admit the Respondent’s supplemental f iling which addresses the Complainant’s
supplemental f iling.
...The additional materials submitted by the Complainant in its supplemental f iling include a number of
statements described as af f idavits and apparently signed by Dr Paiboon Maraprygsavan.
...
2024-01-05 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names <f isher-invest.men>, <f isherinvest.men>, <f isherlnvestments.com> are
registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
7. Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain names <f isher-invest.men>, <f isherinvest.men>, and
<f isherlnvestments.com> be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2025-08-12 - Case Details
Accordingly, the
Center notif ied Respondent’s default on January 31, 2024.
page 2
The Center appointed Gabriel F. Leonardos as the sole panelist in this matter on February 7, 2024. The
Panel f inds that it was properly constituted. .../Gabriel F. Leonardos/
Gabriel F. Leonardos
Sole Panelist
Date: February 21, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Normann Copenhagen ApS v. ...
2024-02-28 - Case Details
The Complainant further owns (amongst many others) the domain name which addresses the
of f icial LEGO website.
The Complainant’s product lines now extend beyond toys, notably, it of fers a LEGO Botanical Collection
featuring buildable f lower and plant sets (essentially f loral-themed LEGO products).
...The additional terms “f lorist”, “f lower”,
“f lowerbouguet”, and “f lowerbouguets” are dictionary terms relating to f lowers or f lower sellers (with
“bouguet” being an obvious misspelling of “bouquet”). ...
2025-12-29 - Case Details