It also notes that these modified versions are not available on of f icial app stores and
must be downloaded f rom third-party sources, including the Respondent’s website.
...Accordingly, the Panel f inds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
WHATSAPP trademark.
...
2025-12-04 - Case Details
Vidare är Sökanden innehavare av följande varumärken:
- EU-varumärkesregistrering nr. 005041629 för O’LEARYS (ord), registrerat den 28 februari 2007;
- EU-varumärkesregistrering nr. 008976086 för O’LEARYS (f igur), registrerat den 16 februari 2012;
- EU-varumärkesregistrering nr. 010231141 för O’LEARYS (f igur), registrerat den 19 februari 2012;
- EU-varumärkesregistrering nr. 017495722 för O’LEARYS (f igur), registrerat den 9 mars 2018; samt
- EU-varumärkesregistrering nr. 017477993 för O’LEARYS (f igur), registrerat den 26 februari 2018.
...Sökanden hade f ram till september 2022 f ranchiseavtal med fyra företag som drevs och ägdes av
Innehavarens bror. ...
2023-12-20 - Case Details
Complainant official website is accessed at “www.lamborghini.com” (the “Of f icial
LAMBORGHINI Marks” Website through Complainant’s of f icial domain name which
incorporates the LAMBORGHINI Marks and which Complainant uses to promote Lamborghini cars in
dif ferent languages worldwide on the Internet.
...Although the addition of other terms may bear on assessment of the second and third elements, the Panel
f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the disputed
domain name and the LAMBORGHINI Marks for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-02-19 - Case Details
At the time of this Complaint,
the disputed domain name no longer resolved to any website content, but according to the screengrab
evidence submitted by the Complainant it previously resolved to a website titled “Sticker Rican” that
purported to sell stickers similar to the Complainant’s of f icial products and used a logo similar to the
Complainant’s of f icial design trademark.
5. ...Thus, the Panel
f inds that the Complainant’s rights in the STICKERICAN trademark have been established pursuant to the
f irst element of the Policy.
...
2025-12-18 - Case Details
Its trade
mark registrations for the mark DULUX include the following:
- China Trade Mark Registration No. 53073, f iled on June 15, 1966;
- China Trade Mark Registration No. 1902944, filed on March 14,2001, registered on August 7, 2002;
- China Trade Mark Registration No. 3278391, filed on August 19, 2002, registered on June 7, 2004;
- China Trade Mark Registration No. 11346741, f iled on August 14, 2012, registered on
January 14, 2014;
- China Trade Mark Registration No. 11346661, f iled on August 14, 2012, registered on
January 14, 2014;
- China Trade Mark Registration No. 12262453, f iled on March 14, 2013, registered on
August 21, 2014;
- Hong Kong, China Trade Mark Registration No. 19350016, filed and registered on July 11, 1934; and
- Hong Kong, China Trade Mark Registration No. 301167660, f iled and registered on July 24, 2008.
...The Panel accordingly f inds that the f irst element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy has been satisf ied.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established a prima facie case that the Respondent has no rights
or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2023-11-02 - Case Details
The additions
of the phrase “footwearhub” does not prevent the Complainant’s trademark f rom being recognizable in the
Disputed Domain Name. The generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.shop” is viewed as a standard
registration requirement and as such may be disregarded under the f irst element confusing similarity test.
...Noting the above considerations, it is not necessary for the Panel to make any ultimate
determination as to the nature of the goods, as the evidence clearly shows the Respondent has attempted to
pass itself of f as the Complainant.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has satisf ied paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.
7. ...
2024-09-26 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.2.1. However, the Panel f inds that the “A” device mark is not suf f iciently
distinctive to provide a basis for a f inding of confusing similarity with the disputed domain name in these
circumstances.
...Panels have held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity (here, claimed
impersonation/passing of f , or other types of f raud) can never confer rights or legitimate interests on a
respondent. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.13.1.
...
2024-07-08 - Case Details
Sökanden innehar registrerat varumärke VEDKUNGEN samt
f irman Vedkungen AB, och bedriver sedan många år en etablerad vedhandelsverksamhet under
kännetecknet “Vedkungen”, bl.a. via . Domännamnet är identiskt med
Sökandens kännetecken och dess innehav hos en annan aktör påverkar Sökandens verksamhet negativt
genom att hindra Sökanden f rån att använda en naturlig .se-adress.
Innehavaren har aldrig använt för vedhandel; Domännamnet har enligt Sökanden aldrig
pekat på en faktisk webbplats för sådan verksamhet och f ramstår som obrukad. ...
2026-02-02 - Case Details
Respondent registered each of the disputed domain names on August 21, 2023. At the time this Complaint
was f iled, the disputed domain names all resolved to websites that attempted to impersonate Complainant by
misappropriating Complainant’s standard character and design HEADOUT trademark as well as the content
of Complainant’s of f icial website.
5. ...D2023-3866; “as an immediate and proactive measure, Complainant had
reported the inf ringing websites hosted under the disputed domain names, and these websites were
consequently blocked after being found to be inf ringing”; and Respondent’s use of the disputed domain
names and Respondent’s websites as part of a phishing or otherwise f raudulent scheme to impersonate
Complainant by misappropriating Complainant’s HEADOUT trademarks as well as other content f rom
Complainant’s of f icial website.
...
2024-01-17 - Case Details
According to
SimilarWeb.com, Complainant’s Of f icial VICTAULIC Mark Website saw an average of 169.5 thousand
visitors per month, during the three-month period f rom June 2023 - August 2023. ...Accordingly, the Panel f inds the disputed domain name
confusingly similar or identical to the VICTAULIC Mark in which Complainant has rights and Complainant has
satisf ied its burden under the f irst element of the Policy.
...
2024-01-03 - Case Details
As such,
the TLD “.org” in the disputed domain name is disregarded for the purposes of the f irst element confusing
similarity test.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...Collectively, this falsely creates
the impression that the disputed domain name is that of the Complainant, or related to, linked to or af f iliated
with the Complainant.
The Panel f inds that the composition of the disputed domain name is such as to carry a risk of implied
af f iliation that cannot constitute fair use, as it effectively impersonates the Complainant, or suggests affiliation
with, or sponsorship or endorsement by, the Complainant. ...
2025-08-18 - Case Details
In this case, the fact that the Disputed Domain
Name was registered before the Complainant acquired (registered) trademark rights, does not by itself
preclude the Complainant’s standing to file a UDRP case, nor the Panel’s f inding of identity or confusing
similarity under the f irst element. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.1.3.
...It is well established that
where a domain name is used to generate revenue in respect of “click through” traf f ic, and that traf f ic has
been attracted because of the name’s association with the Complainant, such use amounts to use in bad
faith, see for example Shangri-La International Hotel Management Limited v. ...
2024-09-04 - Case Details
The gTLD in a domain name “is viewed as a standard registration requirement and as such is disregarded
under the f irst element confusing similarity test.” WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1.
Accordingly, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...case=D2023-1050
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 6
business), and finds that in the circumstances of this case the passive holding of the disputed domain name
does not prevent a f inding of bad faith under the Policy.
Accordingly, the Panel f inds that Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
7. ...
2025-11-26 - Case Details
While the addition of other terms, here “meds”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
Domain Name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...As such, the Panel f inds
that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in relation to the Domain Name.
...
2023-11-02 - Case Details
Instead, the Respondent was using the
disputed domain name to divert Internet traf f ic to a website that prominently displays the Complainant’s
marks and purports to be a crypto trading f irm operating under the Complainant’s name and marks. ...Furthermore, the composition of the disputed domain name directly targeting the Complainant’s f ield of
activity enhances the false impression that the disputed domain name is somehow of f icially related to the
Complainant and an of f icial website promoting the Complainant’s business. ...
2023-12-04 - Case Details
The Respondents are Name Redacted, and Name Redacted 0 F
1.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain names and are registered with
Squarespace Domains II LLC (the “Registrar”). 1 F
2
3. ...WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a non-exclusive list of circumstances that may indicate the
Respondent’s rights to or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name. ...
2023-10-16 - Case Details
page 2
The Panel has not received any requests f rom the Complainant or the Respondent regarding further
submissions, waivers or extensions of deadlines, and the Panel has not found it necessary to request any
further information f rom the Parties.
...The Complainant also operates on the Internet, its of f icial website being at “www.theleela.com”.
The Complainant provided evidence in support of the above.
...
2024-03-06 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain name (including a blank or “coming soon” page) would not
prevent a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding. Having reviewed the available record,
the Panel f inds the non-use of the Domain Names does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the
circumstances of this proceeding. ...
2024-02-22 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.7.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights to or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Panels have found that the non-use of a domain name (including a blank or “coming soon” page) would not
prevent a f inding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding. Having reviewed the record, the Panel
f inds the non-use of the disputed domain name does not prevent a f inding of bad faith in the circumstances
of this proceeding. ...
2024-02-19 - Case Details
International trademark registration number 900154 for LACTALIS (f igurative mark) registered on July 27,
2006, in classes 29, 30 and 35.
Colombian trademark registration number 484725 for LACTALIS (f igurative mark) registered on
December 24, 2013, in class 29.
...As such,
the ccTLD “.co” in the disputed domain name is disregarded for the purposes of the f irst element confusing
similarity test.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...
2025-08-20 - Case Details