About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 3524   document(s)s (0.061 sec)

Rows

<<  <  21 - 40  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2449 for electrolux-se.com html (17 KB)

attempting fraud on the Complainant by exercising attacks on the Complainant's staff. The Complainant further submits that the Respondent cannot acquire any...right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name by holding the disputed domain name for the purpose of furtherance of a fraud through...

2018-02-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-3100 for syncsorrt.com html (16 KB)

Complainant. Complainant states that Respondent has attempted to pass itself off as Complainant in order to perpetuate fraud, namely, to obtain a payment. Thus...perpetuate a fraud. Complainant states that UDRP panels have categorically held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity, including phishing scams...

2021-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1897 for smithzinterconnect.com html (16 KB)

legitimate emails sent by the Complainant, establishing that the Respondent has illegally accessed the Complainant’s emails. The fraud has been perpetrated by...enabled the Respondent successfully to carry out a financial fraud and is clear evidence that the Respondent is not using the disputed domain name for any...

2019-09-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DME2015-0005 for adamsandremers.me html (9 KB)

an email to the Respondent asserting fraud, passing off and trademark infringement and demanding immediate cessation of the use of the disputed domain...domain name has therefore been used as an instrument for the perpetration of a fraud. It is clearly a use intended to attract, for commercial gain...

2015-08-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1577 for filinvestments.com html (7 KB)

financial fraud. The disputed domain name points to a website that purports to be operated by FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) SA, a company within the...the website has cloned FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) SA and has been using the disputed domain name for a share fraud. Furthermore, when the...

2013-11-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0982 for arkemarinc.com html (8 KB)

in domain names or in any other manner. More importantly, the Respondent is using the Domain Name for fraud purpose. The Respondent thus has no...ARKEMA mark at the time of registering the Domain Name. The Respondent is using the Domain Name for purposes of perpetrating fraud. According with the...

2018-07-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2018-0002 for f-bk.co html (9 KB)

of perpetrating a fraud on Complainants’ clients by sending emails from an address that appears to originate from Complainant and misrepresenting...illegal pharmaceuticals, phishing, distributing malware, unauthorized account access/hacking, impersonation/passing off, or other types of fraud) can never...

2018-03-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2131 for accennturre.com html (8 KB)

domain name has not been used in respect of an active website. It has been used in respect of an invoicing fraud, in order to send a fraudulent email to a...or services. To the contrary, the disputed domain name has been used in connection with an invoicing fraud. There has been no evidence adduced to show...

2018-02-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1161 for johambro.com html (9 KB)

trademark and the disputed domain name as part of a fraud scheme to dupe visitors to the Respondent’s website out of their money. The Respondent is using the...purpose of conducting fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings The Complainant has the...

2017-08-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2944 for lactelis.com html (8 KB)

fraud) can never confer rights or legitimate interests ( WIPO Overview 3.0 at section 2.13.1). The Complainant has thus made out at a prima facie case...that use of a domain name to perpetuate fraud constitutes bad faith ( WIPO Overview 3.0 at section 3.4). That fraud was the intention of the Respondent...

2021-11-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3154 for achat-etex.com, etex-building.com, etex-buildingperformance.com, etexgroup-bp.com, etexgroupe.com html (32 KB)

Complainants demonstrated, the Domain Names were used in a fraud scheme using the same pattern of conduct, via email addresses created with the use of the Domain...Names (the Fraud Scheme). The Fraud Scheme involved impersonating two senior management employees of the ETEX group of Complainants by including their...

2021-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2230 for neastle.com html (8 KB)

name for illegal activity (e.g., phishing, impersonation, or other types of fraud) can never confer rights or legitimate interests (see section 2.13.1 of...use of a domain name to perpetuate fraud constitutes bad faith (section 3.4 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 ). That fraud was the intention of the Respondent...

2021-09-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2236 for norishltd.com pdf (131 KB)

relation to bad faith below, it is more likely than not that the Domain Name has been used to impersonate the Complainant for purposes of fraud. Panels have...categorically held that use of a domain name for illegal activity (e.g., impersonation or other types of fraud) can never confer rights or legitimate interests...

2023-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0978 for tompapania.com html (9 KB)

Fraud Expose�, Mr. George Adames, and Mr. Joe Baffa aka Rocky Scarfone Case No. D2001-0978   1. The Parties Complainant is Tom Papania, an individual...located in Marietta, Georgia, USA. Respondent is Fraud Expose located in Lawrenceville, Georgia, USA.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The domain name at...

2001-10-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1141 for didyouknow.com html (7 KB)

site in the hope that a satisfactory solution could be reached. On February 2, 2002, Complainant filed an action for fraud and theft in the courts of...designed to deal with allegations of fraud and theft. It is a limited Policy, dealing with the bad faith registration and use of domain names to profit from...

2008-09-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0653 for nasdaqomxnordic.org html (22 KB)

commit financial fraud by seeking to change Nasdaq’s banking information so that funds can be diverted to fraudulent accounts. The Complainant argues that...intentionally trying to associate itself with Nasdaq to commit its fraud. The Complainant emphasizes that it has neither agreed nor consented to the Respondent’s...

2018-06-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0163 for kpmg-consulting.com html (12 KB)

Domain Name for fraud purposes, it is obvious that in this case the Respondent should be considered as having no rights or legitimate interests in respect...using an address connected to the Domain Name for fraud purposes. This use was clearly intended to confuse the recipient of the email on the origin of the...

2022-03-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2857 for depeche-it.com html (10 KB)

Complainant operates its email address at the domain name , which also redirects to . The disputed domain name has been used in at least one attempt of fraud...tried to take advantage of the sign Depeche to perform a fraud is evidence that the Complainant’s sign DEPECHE is a valid unregistered trademark under the...

2021-02-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-0217 for matakl.com html (13 KB)

However, it has been used to send emails from an email address “[...]@matakl.com” in order to perpetrate a fraud on one of the Complainant’s customers...disputed domain name to impersonate one of the Complainant’s employees and perpetrate fraud on one of its customers. The use of a domain name for illegal...

2020-05-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1960 for frieslandcampima.com html (12 KB)

confusion and commit fraud. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contentions can be summarized as follows: Identical or confusingly similar...create email addresses with the names of the Complainant’s employees in order to create confusion and commit fraud. B. Respondent The Respondent did not...

2020-09-23 - Case Details