About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 3756   document(s)s (0.044 sec)

Rows

1 - 20  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1931 for p-bandai.com html (18 KB)

The website linked to <p-bandai.com>, “www.p-bandai.com”, is a landing page provided by SEDO, which publishes advertising links on the website auto-associated with <p-bandai.com>. 5. ...Respondent The Respondent alleges that the disputed domain name is not confusingly similar to the BANDAI mark because the Complainant does not have a trademark on “p-bandai” in China and other countries. The Respondent alleges that the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests with respect to <p-bandai.com> because the Bandai portion of <p-bandai.com> can be transliterated to “a wide belt” or “apply for a loan” in Chinese, which makes <p-bandai.com> a generic domain name. ...

2012-12-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0368 for adipex-p.com html (18 KB)

One of Complainant’s most successful and well–known diet and weight loss products is a tablet containing the active ingredient of phentermine hydrochloride, which Complainant’s markets and sells under the trademark ADIPEX-P, through its affiliate GATE Pharmaceuticals. ADIPEX-P is the leading brand of phentermine hydrochloride and Complainant has realized approximately $220,000,000 in sales of its ADIPEX-P product since 1998. ...With respect to paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy Complainant contends that: - The ADIPEX-P trademark is arbitrary and fanciful and the disputed Domain Name is identical to the ADIPEX-P trademark...

2007-07-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3497 for em-aower.cyou, em-aower.qpon, em-bower.cyou, em-bower.qpon, em-cower.cyou, em-cower.qpon, em-dower.cyou, em-dower.qpon, em-eower.cyou, em-eower.qpon, em-fower.cyou, em-fower.qpon, em-gower.cyou, em-gower.qpon, em-hower.cyou, em-hower.qpon, em-iower.cyou, em-iower.qpon ... pdf (154 KB)

The Domain Names and Registrar The disputed domain names , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , <p-awer.cyou>, , <p-awer.qpon>, , <p-bwer.cyou>, , <p-bwer.qpon>, , <p-cwer.cyou>, , <p-cwer.qpon>, , <p-dwer.cyou>, , <p-dwer.qpon>, , , , , , , , , <p-ower.cyou>, and <p-ower.qpon> are registered with Gname.com Pte. ...Even the more obscure disputed domain names such as <p-dwer.cyou>, <p-cwer.qpon>, or which at first glance may not appear to resemble the EMPOWER mark, must be assessed in light of the totality of the circumstances. ...

2025-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0581 for valeroenergy.com html (48 KB)

Wick asserts (p. 6) this change led to UDRP opinions that he was attempting to hide is true intentions. Wick asserts also (p. 7): "a. ...Wick contends (p. 6) "many people (including lawyers) have created temporary email addresses and sent me email trying to entrap me. ...

2001-08-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0369 for adipexp.com html (11 KB)

One of the Complainant’s products is a diet and weight loss tablet, containing the ingredient phentermine hydrochloride, which it markets under the name “ADIPEX-P” (the “ADIPEX-P Product”). Since 1998, this product has generated €220,000,000 in sales for the Complainant. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Disputed Domain Name and the Complainant’s trade mark ADIPEX-P are differentiated by the omission of the dash between the “X” and the “P” in the Disputed Domain Name. ...

2007-07-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1647 for capitaliq.asia html (20 KB)

S & P is a leading provider of financial marketing data research and intelligence. And is also known for its indeces, including the S&P 500 index. In 2011, S & P launched a division called S&P CAPITAL IQ combining its brands Standard & Poor's and CAPITAL IQ. The Complainants therefore have significant goodwill and reputation in the mark S&P CAPITAL IQ as well as CAPITAL IQ. ...

2014-11-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1142 for pandocruises.com html (23 KB)

Carnival Plc's portfolio includes a number of leading cruise brands, including P&O CRUISES. P&O CRUISES is one of the oldest brands in the industry and has been in use in connection with “cruise services” since 1843. The Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company (“POSN” ) is the owner of the “P&O” brand and owns numerous trademarks, including Community Trade Mark Registration No. 4,840,302 for P&O CRUISES, UK Trade Mark Registration Nos. 1,328,204, 1,328,205, 1,328,207 and 1,320,208 for P&O and United States Registration No. 3,480,659 for P&O CRUISES. ...

2009-12-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1314 for stvi-valdisere.com html (16 KB)

The Complainant is the owner of the French trademark VAL D’ISÈRE P@SS with registration No. 3671382, registered as of August 19, 2009 for goods and services in International Classes 9, 16, 35, 38, 39 and 41 (the “VAL D’ISÈRE P@SS trademark”). ...The Complainant further contends that the Respondent has not been licensed by the Complainant to use the Complainant’s VAL D’ISÈRE P@SS trademark or to apply for registration of the disputed domain name. The website at the disputed domain name displays pornographic content, which tarnishes the VAL D’ISÈRE P@SS trademark. ...

2019-08-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0829 for abb-wavepower.com, abb-windpower.com html (15 KB)

P-358930; Kl. 1, 6-12, 14, 16, 21 - ABB (Marke mit Bildelementen), Nr. P-360166; Kl. 1, 6-7, 9-12, 14, 16-17 - ABB (Marke mit Bildelementen), Nr. ...P-407466; Kl. 35-37, 41-42 - ABB (Marke mit Bildelementen), Nr. P-407467; Kl. 35-37, 41-42 - ABB, Nr. ...

2009-08-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0230 for bakerperkins.com html (22 KB)

On November 29, 2000, the Disputed Domain Name was transferred to B&P Process Equipment and Systems LLC (“B&P Process”). According to the Complainant’s submissions, an agreement between the Complainant and B&P Process was entered into on or around the year 2000, whereby it was agreed that B&P Process would use and protect the BAKER PERKINS brand in the US in relation to extrusion equipment. ...Any such authorization granted by the Complainant was to B&P Process for the use of the Disputed Domain Name by B&P Process itself, and not to either of the Respondents. ...

2014-04-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0994 for pap-maroc.com html (25 KB)

La défenderesse justifie également être titulaire de la marque marocaine P@P MAGHREB n° 117 630 déposée à l'Office Marocain de la Propriété Industrielle et Commerciale le 27 mai 2008 pour les classes 42 et 36. ...La défenderesse souhaite ainsi conserver son nom de domaine pour une utilisation liée à la marque marocaine P@P MAGHREB, qui ne peut être confondue avec la marque française P.A.P. DE PARTICULIER A PARTICULIER. ...

2009-09-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1801 for axape.com html (16 KB)

The Respondents are P. L., United States of America (“USA”) and One and one Private Registration of Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. ...The Complainant filed an amendment to the Complaint on November 8, 2010, naming P. L. as well as One and one Private Registration as the Respondents, and adding a reference to P. L.’s email to the Center on November 3, 2010, in support of its allegation that the Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2010-12-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1662 for barkitware.com, peesuit.com html (17 KB)

Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is visually and/or phonetically similar to its P-SUIT trademark, including because the second part of the disputed domain name "suit" is identical, and the letter "P" and the term "pee" are phonetically identical and have the same connotation. ...The Panel determines that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's P-SUIT trademark. The Panel determines that Complainant has rights in the trademarks BARKITWEAR and P-SUIT and that the disputed domain names and are confusingly similar to those trademarks, respectively. ...

2017-10-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4881 for pointp.store pdf (140 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Point P SAS v. Gerome lards Case No. D2025-4881 1. The Parties The Complainant is Point P SAS, France, represented by Nameshield, France. ...Finally, the Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith, since the POINT P Trademarks were registered significantly before the registration of the disputed domain name. The Complainant underlines that the Respondent could not have been unaware of the Complainant’s prior rights in the POINT P Trademarks at the time of registration of the disputed domain name. ...

2026-01-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0512 for guide-michelin.com html (21 KB)

Pursuant to Complainant’s allegation, which is denied by Respondent, the latter told the private detective that the Domain Name in question was "available" and that he would consider transferring it (Complaint, p. 12; Response p. 8). In Response to an e-mail of "Alix Genin", dated December 1, 2000, Mr. Newdelman sent the private detective an attachment entitled "Infinex International Ltd. ...However, behind both domain names, it was specifically stated that Respondent had no authority from Michelin and Davidoff, respectively (Complaint Exhibit D and E; Complaint p. 12 f; Response, p. 9). On February 4, 2001, Complainant sent a letter to Mr. Newdelman, requesting Respondent to immediately cease and desist any use of the trademark and to agree to the transfer of the domain name to Michelin & Cie (Complaint Exhibit I). ...

2001-06-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DSE2025-0025 for pkarlssonspgs.se pdf (140 KB)

Sökanden Det omtvistade Domännamnet utgör Sökandens företagsnamn P Karlssons Planering, Gräv & Schakt AB. Sökanden anlitade företaget Qnetcom för att få hjälp med domännamn och mail. ...Domännamnet är identiskt med eller liknar en rättighet vilken har rättsgrund i Sverige och till vilken den som begärt tvistlösningen kan visa rätt Sökanden har som grund för sin talan hänvisat till sitt registrerade företagsnamn P Karlssons Planering, Gräv & Schakt AB. Det omtvistade Domännamnet består av dominanten, P Karlssons, i Sökandens företagsnamn samt bokstäverna p, g och s, som står för de rent beskrivande orden Planering, Gräv och Schakt i företagsnamnet. ...

2025-10-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2360 for onetproprete.com, onetproprete.net pdf (191 KB)

As at May 30, 2024 and September 13, 2024, the same disputed domain name redirected to the domain name <p-hm.com>, which resolved to a website for P-HM Propreté, a company based in Paris of fering cleaning services. ...The Panel recalls that the Registrar has verified that the registrant of the disputed domain names is a party other than P-HM Propreté. The Panel takes note of P-HM Propreté’s submission and will weigh the evidence to which it refers in the record according to its relevance, materiality, and weight. ...

2025-08-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0011 for cellasene.com, cellasenegold.com html (18 KB)

vii) The Complainant wrote to P&M Enterprises in March 2000, demanding that the domain name be transferred to it. ...Chris Gaunt"; and that (2) P&M Enterprises Pty Ltd "is purely a nominee for Mr. Gaunt and others. As P&M does not wish to be involved in these negotiations it has requested that Mr. ...

2003-03-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4703 for p-monetico-service.com, p-monetico-services.com pdf (156 KB)

The Domain Names and Registrar The disputed domain names <p-monetico-service.com> and <p-monetico-services.com> are registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The disputed domain name <p-monetico-service.com> triggers the following message: “Server Error 403, Forbidden. You do not have permission to access this document.” ...

2024-02-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1954 for duracell.info html (7 KB)

Factual Background The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) is the parent company of the Complainant and is one of the largest manufacturers and sellers of consumer goods worldwide. ...On September 7, 2013, an email was sent to a number of contacts at P&G by Pin Pai, who claimed to be the manager of the Domain Name, offering to sell it. P&G responded that they did not wish to buy it and demanded that the Domain Name be cancelled. ...

2014-02-04 - Case Details