les noms de domaine doivent répondre aux exigences de la loyauté selon le droit de la concurrence (ATF 128 III 353 consid. 3 p. 357/358; 126 III 239...consid. 2b et 2c p. 244/245). La jurisprudence enseigne toutefois qu’en cas de collision entre divers droits, il convient de peser les intérêts en présence...
2012-07-16 - Case Details
materia de nombres de dominio (en adelante, el “Reglamento Adicional”). De conformidad con los p�rrafos 2.a) y 4.a) del Reglamento, el Centro notific...formalmente la Demanda a la Demandada, dando comienzo al procedimiento el 24 de octubre de 2007. De conformidad con el p�rrafo 5.a) del Reglamento, el plazo...
2008-01-14 - Case Details
trademark registrations for MR PORTER and MR P, such as: - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4661381 for MR PORTER registered on December 30, 2014 for services...in class 35 of the International Classification of Goods and Services (“ICGS”); - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 5019822 for MR P. (figurative...
2022-10-27 - Case Details
January 15, 2008, under No. 3,368,181 • United States device mark (stylized “P”) registered on 15 November 2016 under No. 5,083,538. • United States device...marks consisting of a stylized “P” and PRINCIPAL registered on 1 November 2016, under Nos. 5,074,931 and 5,074,932. The Domain Name was registered on...
2022-12-29 - Case Details
Bader, P-1 Enterprises Case No. D2016-1148 1. The Parties The Complainant is Kimmel Scrap Iron & Metal Co. of Detroit, Michigan, United States of America...(“USA” or “US”), represented by Clark Hill PLC, USA. The Respondent is Michael Bader, P-1 Enterprises of Eastpointe, Michigan, USA. 2. The Domain Name(s...
2016-08-23 - Case Details
of additional and/or complimentary products. One of these additional ventures includes the creation of sports shoes, under the P’5000 Sport line, which...KG is the registered holder of the domain name , whereupon the Complainant’s legitimate P’5000 Sport products are offered. The Complainant’s P’5000...
2012-12-05 - Case Details
Schydlowsky Case No. D2017-1675 1. The Parties Complainant is The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) of Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America (“US...because it incorporates New Chapter’s NEW CHAPTER trademark in its entirety.” - Paragraph 4(a)(ii): “P&G believes Respondent’s misuse of the domain name is...
2017-11-02 - Case Details
the ORAL-B trademark, used since 1950 in connection with toothbrushes, presently used in connection by the Complainant and Procter and Gamble (“P&G...webpage, but was used in connection with a webpage displaying the Complainant’s trademark and products, claiming to be “part of the P&G family”, purportedly...
2021-09-27 - Case Details
on its website (Complaint p.7 and Exhibit H), which tarnished Complainant�s service mark. - The domain name was registered and is being used in bad...attempted to sell back the domain name to Complainant for financial gain (Complaint p.8). - Remedy Requested: Complainant requests that the disputed domain...
2000-05-17 - Case Details
ofrecido telef�nicamente los mismos al demandante por 45 millones de ESP. Adem�s, el demandado ha colocado bajo sus dominios unas p�ginas pornogr�ficas con...españoles contra el demandado puesto que �ste no ejerce su actividad en España sino en los Estados Unidos de Am�rica y las p�ginas relacionadas con su dominio...
2000-09-15 - Case Details
soluci�n de controversias en materia de nombres de dominio (el “Reglamento Adicional”). De conformidad con los p�rrafos 2.a) y 4.a) del Reglamento, el...Centro notific� formalmente la Demanda al Demandado, dando comienzo al procedimiento el 23 de noviembre de 2004. De conformidad con el p�rrafo 5.a) del...
2005-02-18 - Case Details
materia de nombres de dominio (el “Reglamento Adicional”). De conformidad con los p�rrafos 2.a) y 4.a) del Reglamento, el Centro notific� formalmente la...Demanda a las Demandadas, dando comienzo el 7 de septiembre de 2004. al procedimiento. De conformidad con el p�rrafo 5.a) del Reglamento, el plazo para...
2004-11-10 - Case Details
dominio (el "Reglamento Adicional"). De conformidad con los p�rrafos 2.a) y 4.a) del Reglamento, el Centro notific� formalmente la Demanda al Demandado...dando comienzo al procedimiento el 15�de�julio�de�2004. De conformidad con el p�rrafo 5.a) del Reglamento, el plazo para contestar la Demanda se fij� para...
2004-10-07 - Case Details
present its wares, and possibly host an intranet for inter-location communications, once multiple branch offices were established." (Response p. 1) - The...domain name website does not save the domain name from being identical to the Complainant's mark under the Policy at 4a(i). ( Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a...
2001-06-15 - Case Details
timos a favor del demandado, establecidas en el p�rrafo 4.c de la Pol�tica Uniforme. Por todo ello, el Panel considera tambi�n probada la concurrencia del...n del demandado en el supuesto tipificado en el p�rrafo 4.B ii) de la Pol�tica Uniforme. - la consideraci�n de notoria que este Panel reconoce a la...
2001-06-25 - Case Details
appointed P-E H Petter Rindforth as the sole panelist in this matter on October 29, 2007. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has...TEKNI-PLEX mark, but for the hyphen, and that it is confusingly similar to the TEKNIFLEX mark. According to the Complainant, the letters “F” and “P” are...
2007-11-21 - Case Details
Triesen, Liechtenstein, represented by Dr.�P.�Roth. 2. Domain Name The dispute concerns the domain name . 3. Procedural History The Request was filed...Werberecht, Schulthess 2001, p. 518). The purpose of article 29 CC et seqq. is to individualise a person or organisation and to confer on that person or...
2006-11-15 - Case Details
dominio (el�“Reglamento�Adicional”). De conformidad con los p�rrafos 2.a) y 4.a) del Reglamento, el Centro notific� formalmente la Demanda al Demandado...dando comienzo al procedimiento el 14�de�septiembre�de�2006. De conformidad con el p�rrafo 5.a) del Reglamento, el plazo para contestar la Demanda se fij...
2006-11-06 - Case Details
trademark with the sole difference being the addition of the letter “P” in the middle of the word. The Complainant points out that the letter “P” is next to...Complainant’s trademark, the only difference being the addition of the letter “P”. In the Panel’s view the additional letter does not serve to distinguish the...
2011-06-21 - Case Details
Panel notes that the address and city fields of the WhoIs record states “p t”. According to the printout of the website resolved from the Disputed Domain...provision of contact particulars comprising a street named “p t” in a city named “p t” is of significance. The street “p t” and city “p t” are clearly...
2010-11-29 - Case Details