& Whitney, LLP, US. The Respondent is Jiang Zhou of Auckland, New Zealand, represented by ESQwire.com P. C. Law Firm, US. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The...update regarding the due date for Response on July 21, 2015. On the same day, the Respondent’s legal representative, Jason Schaeffer of ESQwire.com P. C...
2015-09-15 - Case Details
with the Respondents election of having the dispute decided by a three-member Administrative Panel, the Center appointed P-E Petter Rindforth, Anders...transferred to the Complainant AB Svenska Spel. P-E Petter Rindforth Presiding Panelist Anders Janson Panelist Stefan Abel Panelist Dated: October 2, 2003 ...
2003-10-03 - Case Details
per-click advertising. It seems to the [p]anel that the developing consensus is that the domainer must make reasonable good faith efforts to avoid...]omplainant, including links to third-party websites selling domain names and web hosting services. The [p]anel finds that [r]espondent is taking advantage of...
2010-12-13 - Case Details
Mutuelle d�Assurance du Corps de Santé Français v. SA CHA REBK LLC , WIPO Case No. D2000-0450 , p. 4). - The Complainant seeks the benefit of the...or Time Magazine " ( WIPO Case No. D2000-0299 , at p. 9). - The Complainant further contends that as held in the Migros case, the Administrative Panel...
2001-06-22 - Case Details
to The New York Times�s General Counsel, identified Internet NYIS�s counsel as Thomas P. Liniak, Esq. at a firm in Bethesda, Maryland, acknowledged...that we contact you to request a one week stay of the proceedings." "On September 19, 2000, we attempted to reach Thomas P. Liniak ... by phone and by e...
2000-12-11 - Case Details
in this proceeding by Amy B. Goldsmith, Esq. and Marc P. Misthal, Esq., of Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C., 270 Madison Avenue, New York, New York...Supplement to the Complaint, with copy to the Complainant. On July 11, 2000, the WIPO Center received a request by the Complainant�s Representative Mr. Marc P...
2000-07-20 - Case Details
Case No. D2000-0003 (February 20, 2000) and Strålfors AB v. P D S AB , WIPO Case No. D2000-0112 (April 17, 2000). The Complainant, considering all of the...(April 12, 2000); Strålfors AB v. P D S AB WIPO Case No. D2000-0112 (April 17, 2000); InfoSpace.com, Inc. v. Tenenbaum Ofer WIPO Case No. D2000-0075 (May 2...
2003-04-22 - Case Details
Yet, Respondent admits that in 1998 it was preparing a website to market and sell shoes over the Internet. ( Id. at p.1). Respondent further admits that...Tiffany. (Response, p.3). Respondent then uses these false representations as a foundation for its argument that it has no desire to sell Complainant�s...
2001-09-13 - Case Details
the Panel: Complaint, par 32, Annex P. The Complainant submits that neither the prior or current uses of the disputed domain name are legitimate uses...can not constitute a ‘ bona fide’ offering of goods or services” ( Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com ,” WIPO Case No. D2000...
2007-02-08 - Case Details
Ltd.; Apple Bottoms, LLC; and Cornell Haynes p/k/a “Nelly” v. Patrick Vanderhorst Case No. D2005-0636 1. The Parties The Complainants are Sound Unseen...Ltd.; Apple Bottoms, LLC; and Cornell Haynes p/k/a “Nelly”, all located in St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America; represented by Silver...
2005-09-12 - Case Details
faith, as it is stated in the Policy, is still present. As is cited in Panavision Inc and Panavision International L. P. v. Ed Meyer, d/b/a Panavisions...iii) of the Policy. As the panel ruled in Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com” , WIPO Case No. D2000—0847 , “the Policy...
2005-06-01 - Case Details
following text was added to the home page of the website: “We are not an Apparel Company. We do not sell athletic apparel. [P]lease do not email us about...apparel. [P]lease do not email us about sales. We recommend www.underarmour.com or www.Nike.... The following communications took place by email and phone...
2022-08-11 - Case Details
Complainant’s trademark. Indeed, as stated in section 2.13.1 of the WIPO Overview 3.0, “[p]anels have categorically held that the use of a domain name for illegal...fraudulent purposes. As stated in section 3.4 of the WIPO Overview 3.0, “[p]anels have held that the use of a domain name for purposes other than to host a...
2023-05-05 - Case Details
representatives, W P Thompson and Co, dated February 27, 2002, says it is sent on behalf of the First Complainant. It would appear to the Respondent, however, that...However, The Respondent contends that the response on behalf of the First Complainant through its patent attorney, W P Thompson and Co dated February 27...
2002-06-03 - Case Details
extended by agreement between the parties to January 12, 2009. The Response was filed with the Center January 12, 2009. The Center appointed William P...Paragraph 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name, be transferred to the Complainant. William P. Knight Presiding Panelist Knud Wallberg...
2009-03-09 - Case Details
limitation, if found by the [p]anel to be proved based on its evaluation of all evidence presented, shall demonstrate your rights or legitimate interests to...the domain name for purposes of [p]aragraph 4(a)(ii): (i) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the...
2009-11-10 - Case Details
prior use to in domain name disputes constitutes a bona-fide use: Madonna Ciccone p/k/a v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com" , WIPO Case No. D2000-0847...the Respondent does not of itself necessarily confer legitimate interests under the Policy. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and...
2009-08-11 - Case Details
2010, the filing date of the Complaint, the Respondent uses the disputed domain name to resolve to a parking page, a copy of which appears in Annex P to...provided in Annex P to the Complaint. Further, as of April 1, 2010, the Respondent uses the disputed domain name to resolve to a web page (a copy of which...
2010-06-22 - Case Details
(Complaint, p. 6). However, prior to receiving any notice of this dispute, Respondent conceptualized and began to develop a business plan for KAZOO, as...compensation beyond the cost of registration fees ( see p. 6 of Complaint), Respondent hereby introduces California Evidence Code Section 1152(a) which provides...
2000-11-03 - Case Details
in Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com "(WIPO case D2000-0847) that use which intentionally trades on the fame of another...in asserting "the concept of the shared nature of the name FOYLES" (Response p.7), the Respondent acknowledges that the Complainant also has at least...
2001-01-24 - Case Details