In addition, the Respondent has offered the domain name
for sale on a website dedicated to the sale of domain names: see http://www.greatdomains.com
(Tab E). The Complainant states (at Complaint, p 6) that when one types the
domain name <3mcare.com>, it automatically links to
and asks for an offer to purchase the domain name. ...
2001-06-18 - Case Details
The name "Nagatanien" has been widely advertised and publicized in television and various other media for more than 40 years in the past (see Complaint's Annex D, p.14). The Complainant's name "Nagatanien" as gained a high popularity and recognition among Japanese consumers and dealers, shown by the fact that it was listed in the AIPPI Japan's publication "FAMOUS TRADEMARKS IN JAPAN" (see Complaint's Annex F.)
4.3 The Complainant is the registrant of the domain name "nagatanien.co.jp" and currently operates its principal web site at "nagatanien.co.jp" (see Complaint's Annex G). ...
2001-02-28 - Case Details
Currently, they are sold in at least 9 department stores and 4 boutiques, totaling several million US$ per year (Complaint p. 6, Complaint Exhibit B).
The Complainant states that the Guerlain trademark is protected in over 120 countries and provides the details of the trademark registrations for Thailand. ...
2001-03-06 - Case Details
Lorna Kang a/k/a Yong Li a/k/a/ Mahmoud Nadim ak/a The Data in Bulkregister.com's WHOIS Database is p a/k/a Amjad Kausar,
WIPO Case No. D2005-0635.
The Panel finds the Complainant has put forward a strong case and agrees with the Complainant's argument that the totality of circumstances shows the Respondent's bad faith intent to exploit and profit from the Complainant's mark.
...
2009-04-30 - Case Details
Nevertheless, the clear intention of ICANN in adopting
the Policy and Rules in their present form was that supplementary submissions
should be requested by a Panel in exceptional cases only: Gordon Sumner,
p/k/a Sting v. Michael Urvan, WIPO Case
No. D2000-0596.
This is not a case of discovery of evidence not reasonably
available to the parties at the time of their initial submissions nor of arguments
by one that the other could not reasonably have anticipated: see Goldline
International, Inc. v. ...
2004-06-21 - Case Details
On August 17, 2000, WIPO Center received an email from Duan Yueh Liu in Taiwan stating in effect that the Complainant did not cite the correct respondent. The email stated that Soe Min of P O Box 1352, GPO, Myanmar Ports and Telecommunication, Yangon, Myanmar is responsible for issues regarding "zippo.ws" including "transfer ownership".
...
2000-09-20 - Case Details
The Disputed
Domain Name exchanges the “p” and “a”
of STAPLES.COM. Previous panels have found mistyped domain names to be confusingly
similar to the marks at issue. ...
2004-10-15 - Case Details
Thus, while the Respondent has indeed
used the disputed domain name in connection with an offering of goods, that
offering was not bona fide. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi
and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case
No. D2000-0847 (October 12, 2000), at pages 3-4.
...
2004-09-13 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainant in this administrative proceeding is One 2 One, a UK partnership comprising Deutsche Telekom Mobile Number 1 Limited, One 2 One Personal Communications Limited and Deutsche Telekom Mobile No. 5 Limited of Imperial Place, Maxwell Road, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 1EA, United Kingdom represented by Bird & Bird, solicitors, of 90 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1JP, United Kingdom. The Respondent is Jason P. Styers of 59 The Marian Way, Netherton, Liverpool, Merseyside L30 3TB, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name in issue is "one2one3g.com ("the Domain Name"), the Registrar of which is CORE Internet Council of Registrars ("CORE").
3. ...
2000-06-20 - Case Details
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority of Article 4(i) of the UDRP, the Panel requires that the registration of the Domain Name ("geociites.com") be transferred to the Complainant.
Jeffrey P. Kushan
Presiding Panelist
Dated: June 19, 2000...
2000-06-23 - Case Details
Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with
paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the
domain names, and be transferred to the
Complainant, Beiersdorf AG.
P-E H Petter Rindforth
Sole Panelist
Dated June 15, 2005...
2005-06-28 - Case Details
D2003-0490 BellSouth Intellectual Property Corporation v. Michele Dinoia, Annex p; WIPO Case No. D2004-0486, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Anti-Globalization Domains a/k/a Azra Ari Khan a/k/a John Barry, Annex H1WIPO Case No. ...
2005-06-27 - Case Details
Also, note that Respondent is using the well known single bull
and double bull depictions of Complainant’s mark, thereby leading the
internet user into believing that Respondent’s website is associated with
Complainant when, in fact, it is not associated with Complainant.) See also
Madonna Ciccone p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 and The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, N.A. v. ...
2005-06-27 - Case Details
Or, l'enregistrement d'un nom de domaine correspondant à la marque de haute renommée d'un tiers ne peut être considéré comme un usage légitime du nom de domaine; en décider autrement reviendrait à admettre que la violation intentionnelle par le défendeur des droits du requérant peut constituer un intérêt légitime, ce qui serait à l'évidence contraire au but poursuivi par les Principes directeurs (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
Litige OMPI No. D2000-0847). Certes, on peut ici se demander si la reconnaissance de la dénomination ne porte pas plus sur l'appellation d'origine protégée que sur les marques collectives dont le requérant est titulaire. ...
2010-01-18 - Case Details
It follows that non-distinctive alterations (exchanging “p” for “b” and removal of “li”) to this highly distinctive mark do not sufficiently distance the disputed domain names from BHP Billiton Innovation's trademark in order to avoid confusion.
...
2009-02-04 - Case Details
It thus appears likely that Respondent’s use of the privacy service registration may have been ended by commencement of this proceeding.
2 The evidence submitted is undated but its text indicates an expiration date of June 30, 2006, implying that the document predates that date.
3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d).
4 WIPO Overview, paragraph 2.4 (“This section only concerns sites that practice genuine, non-commercial criticism.”) ...
2008-05-30 - Case Details
L’Expert considère en l’espèce que le nom de domaine litigieux est un cas évident de typosquatting, dans la mesure où cette suppression d’une seule lettre par rapport au nom de domaine enregistré par le Requérant vise à détourner les internautes qui commettent une erreur de frappe en voulant accéder au site Internet “www.phildar.fr” et omettent de taper la lettre “h” entre le “p” et le “i”, sont alors dirigés vers un site Internet offrant des liens vers des sites dédiés à la laine et au tricot, et sont donc amenés à penser que ce site est exploité par le Requérant.
...
2008-02-14 - Case Details
The Panel presumes that the Respondent receives fees from advertising these third-party links or from when a user clicks on such links.
As stated in Madonna Ciccone p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847, “use which
intentionally trades on the fame of another can not constitute a bona fide
offering of goods or services. ...
2006-10-26 - Case Details
En efecto, en
el Diario Oficial de la Generalitat Valenciana núm. 4184, de 6 de febrero de 2002,
se publicó la notificación efectuada por el Instituto de la Pequeña y Mediana
Industria de la Generalitat Valenciana (IMPIVA) a Joaquín Bañuls Cots, de la
resolución del Expediente número IMEREH/2001/10, en relación con la denegación
de ayuda por resolución del presidente del Instituto de la Pequeña y Mediana
Empresa de Industria de la Generalitat Valenciana (IMPIVA) de fecha 25 de septiembre de 2001,
en relación con el Programa IMEREH-P Energías renovables. Dicha notificación
se efectuó a Joaquín Bañuls Cots en el mismo domicilio en que posteriormente
se le notificó el requerimiento enviado por el Demandante instando la transferencia
del Nombre de Dominio. ...
2007-02-27 - Case Details
It has been decided in other matters that multiple domain names in a single or few applications may amount to a pattern of conduct in the sense of article 4(b)(ii) of the P. It is clearly open to the Panel to find that the domain names were registered in order to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name.
...
2006-12-06 - Case Details