The Malaysian government has approved "FJBEN Jamin Kualiti Consultant"
as a company registration with the registration number MA0074079-P under the
Quality Management and Industrial Training Provider category. The word "Konsultant"
was changed to "Consultant" to conform to the Malay language statute
requirement for the company’s legal document. ...
2004-01-12 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, whose predecessor was founded in 2009, is a Delaware (United States) corporation
whose shares have been traded on the New York Stock Exchange since May 2019 and have been included
in the S&P 500 since December 2023. The Complainant operates a technology platform that connects
consumers with independent drivers for ridesharing services and with public transportation networks. ...
2024-11-25 - Case Details
On January 10, 2006, Complainant obtained a registration for the trademark, WIKIPEDIA, registration No.
3,040,722, from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), for “[p]roviding information in the
field of general encyclopedic knowledge via the Internet.” The registration indicates first use of the mark in
January 2001. ...
2025-07-15 - Case Details
Complainant employed approximately 14,700 employees in 22
countries as of December 31, 2024. Complainant is a member of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index, and
its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol EFX. ...
2026-01-02 - Case Details
Based on the screenshots submitted as Annex E2 to the Complaint – which have not been contested by the Respondent - prior to the p...
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
B. Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
6.1. Procedural Issues
Due to the similarities of the ADR Rules and the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “UDRP”), the Panel will also take into account the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), a...
6.2. ...
2025-10-28 - Case Details
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 6
The Panel is not persuaded by Complainant’s contention that Respondent’s several renewals of the Disputed
Domain Name may be considered registrations for the purpose of evaluating bad faith. “[P]anels have found
that the mere renewal of a domain name registration by the same registrant is insufficient to support a finding
of registration in bad faith.” ...
2025-11-04 - Case Details
The Panel is of the same view as those in the previous UDRP decisions mentioned in section 4.17 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), which held that “[p]anels have widely recognized that mere delay between the registration of a domain name and the filing of a complaint neither bars a complainant from filing such case, nor from potentially prevailing on the merits”. ...
2022-02-07 - Case Details
The Respondents’ registration and use of the Disputed Domain Names indicate that such registration and use has been done for the specific purpose of trading on and targeting the name and reputation of the Complainants and their VULKAN Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”). ...
2021-09-20 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which states “[p]anels have
consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar
(particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a famous
or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith.”
...
2024-04-30 - Case Details
In this regard, the Panel refers to the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4, which
states “[p]anels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or
confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive
term) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of
bad faith.” ...
2023-11-20 - Case Details
The Complainant is a member of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index, and its common stock is traded on the
New Your Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol EFX.
...
2023-02-14 - Case Details
“Any of the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, if found by the Panel to be proved based on its evaluation of all evidence presented, shall demonstrate your rights or legitimate interests to the domain name for purposes of p...
(i) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or
(ii) you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by the domain name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or
(iii) you are making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue”. ...
2024-09-09 - Case Details
Here, the Respondents’ registration and
use of the Disputed Domain Names indicates that such registration and use had been done for the specific
purpose of trading upon and targeting the name and reputation of the Complainant. See Madonna Ciccone,
p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible
explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of
Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2024-02-29 - Case Details
The Complainant is owner of several registered trademarks for MEDAXIS including:
- Swiss trademark P-480203 in class 10, having a registration date on January 12, 2001; and
- International Registration 754938 in class 10 having a registration date of March 6, 2001 and extended
to China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America.
...
2024-08-05 - Case Details
Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition (4th ed. 2005) §31: 10, p. 31-35 and cases cited therein. The remedies under the Policy are similarly injunctive rather than compensatory in nature, and the focus is on avoiding confusion in the future as to the source of goods or services. ...
2015-06-19 - Case Details
Complainant refers to the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Second Edition ("WIPO Overview 2.0"), paragraph 1.3, which states that "[g]enerally, a domain name consisting of a trademark and a negative or pejorative term (such as [trademark]sucks.com) would be considered confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark for the purpose of satisfying the standing requirement under the first element of the UDRP" and "[p]anels have recognized that inclusion of a subsidiary word to the dominant feature of a mark at issue typically does not serve to obviate confusion for purposes of the UDRP's first element threshold requirement, and/or that there may be a particular risk of confusion among Internet users whose first language is not the language of the domain name." ...
2015-12-22 - Case Details
Furthermore, the Panel notes that the acquisition of a license of use of a trademark which corresponds to a disputed domain name does not necessarily establish rights or legitimate interests in that domain name for the purpose of the second element of the UDRP, where the overall circumstances demonstrate that such trademark rights were obtained primarily to circumvent the application of the UDRP (see Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter Plc v. ...
2016-11-14 - Case Details
John Adams, Roger Brownsword, Key Issues in Contract (1st ed, 1995) p.198)”. The Respondent refers to some other apparent authorities in relation to the formation of contracts, and says that it has established the principles which constitute good faith as regards its previous relationship with Medtronic and Physio Control as distributors of Lifepak Defibrillators since 2006. ...
2016-06-28 - Case Details
With respect to unsolicited filings, this Panel is of the view expressed in Gordon Sumner, p/k/a Sting v. Michael Urvan,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0596, that unsolicited submissions will be considered only in exceptional circumstances, and only when the party filing the unsolicited submission explains the exceptional circumstances and why the material could not have been submitted with the Complaint or Response.
...
2017-08-23 - Case Details
The Parties
The Complainant is Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Vedder Price P. C., United States.
The Respondent is David Eaves, United States, represented by Offices of Catherine Simmons-Gill, LLC, United States.
2. ...
2019-07-18 - Case Details