seinem unter registrierten Domainnamen betreibt der Gesuchsgegner sog. Typosquatting. Beim Typosquatting nutzt der Nichtberechtigte die Bekanntheit eines...Tippfehlern der Internet-Benutzer bei der Eingabe des Domainnamens, um die Benutzer auf die eigene Website zu lenken (sog. “Typosquatting”), verletzt in der...
2012-11-06 - Case Details
“typosquatting” by Respondent. Complainant asserts that Respondent has no legitimate rights or interests in the domain name. Complainant asserts bad faith...typosquatting – using a small typographical variation between someone else’s mark and one’s own domain name in order to attract Internet traffic to one’s own site...
2005-03-08 - Case Details
of ‘typosquatting’” and is likely to be confused with its distinctive service mark, and its rights therein which are expansive and predate the...Respondent’s registration. Typosquatting, it contends, virtually dictates a finding of bad faith. The Complainant points out that although it does not operate...
2004-12-09 - Case Details
or remove confusion. On the contrary, it contends the disputed domain name is an example of “typosquatting” designed to be confusing and profit by...confusion. It points out that numerous panel decisions have accepted these propositions with respect to instances of “typosquatting”: eg Deutsche Bank AG v...
2007-11-09 - Case Details
“typosquatting” can constitute confusing similarity for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. And, while the typosquatting cases are usually cases where the...The typosquatting can consist of misspelling of two letters as previous UDRP panels have decided ( see for example FragranceX.com, Inc. v. Argosweb Corp...
2013-08-06 - Case Details
typosquatting form, and is confusingly similar to the MR. BRICOLAGE trademark. The Complainant further contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...typosquatting form, by deleting the second letter “r” from the MR. BRICOLAGE mark and replacing “.” with a hyphen “-”. However, the Complainant’s MR. BRICOLAGE...
2023-07-17 - Case Details
identical to its trademark with the exclusion of the letter “r”. This is typosquatting. The Domain Name and the Complainant’s trademark are confusingly...intentional misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark. Typosquatting indicates a lack of legitimate interest. The Complainant argues that the Respondent’s...
2023-07-13 - Case Details
trademark registrations and argues that the Domain Name reproduces its trademark with the additional letter “e”. This is typosquatting. The Domain Name and...Domain Name. The Respondent has made an intentional misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark. Typosquatting indicates a lack of legitimate interest. The...
2023-07-13 - Case Details
Claimants The Claimants allege that the Respondent has engaged in so-called typosquatting, by adding the letter “e” to the Claimants’ well-known DALLMAYR...redirecting to various different websites. The Respondent has thus clearly engaged in so-called “typosquatting”, i.e. in registering and using domain names with...
2023-09-04 - Case Details
Respondent has engaged in typosquatting by adding a “virtually unnoticeable” third lowercase letter “I” to the disputed domain name in order to confuse...submits that the Respondent instead has engaged in a typosquatting scheme, passing itself off as the Complainant in order to profit from Internet users...
2020-07-13 - Case Details
the ACCENTURE trademark constitutes “typosquatting” and is generally insufficient to materially distinguish a domain name from another’s trademark. The...name other than to trade off the reputation and goodwill of the Complainant’s marks. Typosquatting constitutes strong evidence of bad faith. The...
2019-09-26 - Case Details
” in the ACCENTURE mark which constitutes “typosquatting”. Furthermore, the Complainant states that the Respondent has no interest in the famous...registered the disputed domain name other than to trade off the reputation and goodwill of the Complainant’s marks. Moreover, typosquatting constitutes strong...
2019-07-18 - Case Details
disputed domain name, commonly known as “typosquatting”, makes no difference to the overall impression of the dominant word in the disputed domain name. The...to use the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. The Respondent’s typosquatting activities undermines a...
2021-05-03 - Case Details
constitutes a clear case of typosquatting as the Respondent has intentionally misspelled the famous RBC ROYAL BANK trademark by omitting the letter “a” between...entirety of the RBC and ROYAL BANK trademarks. Furthermore, the Respondent’s typosquatting constitutes prima facie evidence of confusion and is direct...
2020-12-01 - Case Details
” (regenreron), thus engaging in typosquatting. Complainant further alleges that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and...above, Respondent has engaged in typosquatting by adding an “r” to Complainant’s REGENERON mark to constitute the disputed domain name . Typosquatting may...
2017-03-31 - Case Details
registration of the disputed domain name presents as a classic case of typosquatting. The disputed domain name is nearly identical and/or confusingly similar to...adding a letter “m” at the end of the address. This is classic typosquatting, intended to direct Internet users who misspell the Complainant’s trademark to...
2019-04-15 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is an instance of 'typosquatting', which involves a registered trademark being used in a domain name but with additional...letters being added or with some letters being omitted or changed. The practice of typosquatting has been condemned by many UDRP panels. See WIPO Overview...
2017-11-17 - Case Details
commonly referred to as "typosquatting". The addition of the generic Top Level Domain ".com" is insignificant and does not remove the likelihood of confusion...the face of it to be a typosquatting registration. Typosquatting itself is evidence of relevant bad faith registration and use. Here the typosquatting...
2017-10-02 - Case Details
Complainant’s products and services. Furthermore, Complainant states that this is a case of “typosquatting”, as the dominant or principal parts of the Trademarks...“typosquatting”, i.e ., the intentional registration of a domain name with slight misspelling of a trademark. Although it does not appear from the case file that...
2017-07-05 - Case Details
” portion of the mark typosquatted, which creates confusing similarity. It is well settled that typosquatting is clear evidence of likelihood of confusion...holding, and the typosquatting. As WIPO Overview 3.0 , section 3.1.4 states: “[T]he mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly...
2022-01-05 - Case Details