the disputed domain names are misspellings of the word "Virgin". This conduct constitutes domain name typosquatting. The disputed domain names are...confusingly similar therefore to the Complainant's trademarks. There have been several UDRP decisions where typosquatting domain names have been transferred to...
2015-04-15 - Case Details
registered trademark (and corporate name and website) only by transposition of the first two letters. As such, this is a textbook example of typosquatting. The...to Complainant’s competitors only makes matters worse. Bad faith. Respondent’s bad faith is demonstrated by his typosquatting, which by itself is...
2006-05-05 - Case Details
Domain Names, each of which is an intentional misspelling of the BARNES & NOBLE Mark. The Respondent is engaged in typosquatting, which is in and of itself...stroke or strokes, a practice commonly known as typosquatting. Typosquatting is evidence of bad faith and in this respect the Complainant refers to Longs...
2007-04-26 - Case Details
‘and’ or the German ‘und’. This is an example of typosquatting which would cause Internet users who misspell the Complainant’s trademarks to be directed...to the Respondent. Typosquatting has been repeatedly condemned in WIPO UDRP decisions. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the...
2007-04-02 - Case Details
for any legitimate purpose, the Panel finds that the Respondent has registered and used the Domain Name in an effort to typosquat on the Complainant’s...typosquatting. (Section V(C) of the Complaint). The Complainant requests a decision that the Domain Names be transferred to it. B. Respondent As noted above, the...
2016-03-22 - Case Details
The fact that the disputed domain name is a typo variation (“typosquatting”) on the HARTFORD Marks. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the...established rights in the HARTFORD Marks. The Panel agrees with the Complainant’s assertions that the disputed domain name is a typo variation (“typosquatting...
2016-02-08 - Case Details
respondents to register domain names with minor spelling variations, a phenomenon which is commonly known as "typosquatting". The slight spelling variation does...Respondent's has deliberately chosen a misspelling of the Complainant's mark as its domain name, commonly known as typosquatting. To perpetuate a fraud by using...
2016-01-13 - Case Details
disputed Domain Name represents typosquatting. This close misspelling renders the Domain Name confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark. Alta Vista Co...an act of typosquatting in relation to the disputed Domain Name. Typosquatting is sufficient to support an inference of bad faith shifting the burden...
2006-07-18 - Case Details
this is a case of “typosquatting”. In connection with the first UDRP element (identity / confusing similarity), citing Edmunds.com Inc v. The Registrant...respondent's domain name constitutes typosquatting and is consequently confusingly similar to the complainant's trade mark. On this basis the Complainant asserts...
2010-07-21 - Case Details
trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. The Complainant further contends that this is a clear case of typosquatting since the omission of a...of a common typosquatting of the ASHLEY MADISON trademark that it is clear that the Respondent knew of the Complainant and its trademark. In addition...
2022-08-24 - Case Details
use of or a legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. 3. Typosquatting – close imitation of the Complainant’s marks with a minor typographical...Complainant has established this Policy element. C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith Typosquatting by itself establishes the two principal factual matters...
2022-11-15 - Case Details
the letter “r” with letter “l” and the missing letters “le”. This is a case of typosquatting, as these minor modifications were intentional and...agrees that the disputed domain name is a clear case of typosquatting. See section 1.9 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions...
2022-12-09 - Case Details
name incorporates the Complainant’s trademark VEEPEE with a typo by removing the letter “e”. This is a typical case of typosquatting, which is designed...disputed domain name is a classic example of typosquatting, whereby the Respondent has intentionally sought to mislead Internet users unaware of the one...
2023-07-18 - Case Details
appearance of “typosquatting” intended to take advantage of Internet users, including email recipients, not noticing the additional letter, and intended to be...typosquatting, whereby a domain name is registered with a minor variation of a well-known brand name with a view to taking advantage of typographical errors or...
2024-03-14 - Case Details
modifications to trademarks is commonly referred to as ‘typosquatting’ or ‘typo-piracy,’ as such conduct seeks to wrongfully take advantage of errors by users in...typing domain names into their web browser’s location bar.”). The spelling errors used in typosquatting have been found to produce domain names that are...
2019-10-29 - Case Details
Case No. D2008-1302 (“Such insignificant modifications to trademarks is commonly referred to as ‘typosquatting’ or ‘typo-piracy,’ as such conduct seeks...typosquatting have been found to produce domain names that are confusingly similar to the marks which they mimic. See, e.g. , Yahoo! Inc. and GeoCities v. Data...
2019-08-07 - Case Details
modifications to trademarks is commonly referred to as ‘typosquatting’ or ‘typo-piracy,’ as such conduct seeks to wrongfully take advantage of errors by users in...typing domain names into their web browser’s location bar.”) The spelling errors used in typosquatting have been found to produce domain names that are...
2020-02-19 - Case Details
Complainant’s mark, (ii) is using the disputed domain name to intentionally trade on Complainant’s CORNING mark, (iii) is intentionally engaged in typosquatting...that it has not engaged in typosquatting, but has registered a domain name based on the common name and term “Corming.” Respondent also argues that...
2021-07-06 - Case Details
single letter ‘a’ is an obvious attempt to ‘typosquat’ the Domain Name and is insufficient to avoid confusion”. See along the same lines ACCOR v. Eduardo...considered a prototypical example of typosquatting, which intentionally takes advantage of Internet users that inadvertently type an incorrect address – often...
2022-03-17 - Case Details
” and (ii) the letter “l” added between “v” and “a”. While the Complainant contends that these differences constitute typosquatting, the Panel has...highly unlikely in the Panel’s view. However, an inquiry into similarity under paragraph 4(a)(i) is not limited to typosquatting cases. The present...
2014-05-30 - Case Details