the Complainant’s trademark and adds the letter “s”. This is a case of “typosquatting” where a trademark is misspelt by the addition of an extra letter...Complainant’s trademark. The mark is replicated and an “s” added. This is an obvious case of typosquatting. Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy has been established...
2015-09-01 - Case Details
“typosquatting”. Though the Panel would not choose that term to describe the Respondent’s conduct in this case, the issue is a technical one, not outcome...determinative. The term “typosquatting”—as a portmanteau of “typographical error” and “cybersquatting”—presumes an opportunistic act on the part of a domain name...
2016-09-30 - Case Details
services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use. The Domain Name appears to be a typosquatting registration differing from the Complainant’s domain name... by only one letter. Typosquatting is also an indication of a lack of rights or legitimate interests. The Respondent has not answered this Complaint...
2023-09-08 - Case Details
confusion on the Internet for commercial gain and disrupting the Complainant’s business. Typosquatting is registration and use in bad faith per se. B...typosquatting registration. Typosquatting is also an indication of a lack of rights or legitimate interests. The Respondent has not answered this Complaint or...
2021-12-02 - Case Details
United States for computer software since 1985. It owns . The Domain Name registered in 2008 is a typosquatting registration and confusingly similar to the...offering of goods or services or a noncommercial legitimate or fair use. Typosquatting is redirecting customers looking for the Complainant who misspell the...
2019-09-12 - Case Details
typosquatting; that Respondent lacks any right or legitimate interest in the Disputed Domain Name; and that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and used in...typosquatting that relies on an easy keyboard mistake in substituting the letter “I” for the adjacent letter “U” on a qwerty keyboard. The Panel finds in favor of...
2013-05-31 - Case Details
Complainant Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is an example of typosquatting; that Respondent lacks any right or legitimate interest in the...of typosquatting that relies on an easy keyboard mistake in substituting the letter “y” for the adjacent letter “t” on a qwerty keyboard. The Panel...
2013-05-31 - Case Details
information. The Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name amounts is an example of typosquatting. The Respondent has made no use of the disputed...registration of the disputed domain name presents as a classic case of typosquatting. The disputed domain name is nearly identical and/or confusingly similar to...
2019-04-12 - Case Details
registration of the disputed domain name is a classic case of typosquatting. The Respondent has made no active use of the disputed domain name. The disputed...presents as a classic case of typosquatting. The disputed domain name is nearly identical and/or confusingly similar to the TOMMY BAHAMA trademark, as well...
2019-04-12 - Case Details
case of typosquatting. The disputed domain name and the Complainant’s mark NATIXIS are both composed of seven letters. Moreover they have 6 identical...similar to the Complainant’s mark NATIXIS and represents a clear case of typosquatting in the sense of WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP...
2019-04-25 - Case Details
typosquatting. The generic Top-Level-Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” should typically be ignored. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...legitimate noncommercial or fair use as the disputed domain name is a case of typosquatting and leads to an inactive website. The Complainant contends that the...
2022-06-15 - Case Details
the UDRP Complaint does not point to an active web site. The Domain Name is a typosquatting registration differing from the Complainant’s domain name...privacy shield had been removed). There is no bona fide offering of goods or services or legitimate noncommercial or fair use. Typosquatting is bad faith...
2022-10-10 - Case Details
Domain Name is a typosquatting registration different by only one letter from the Complainant’s domain name . Typosquatting is also...to be a typosquatting registration differing from the Complainant’s domain name by only one letter and has been offered for...
2022-09-15 - Case Details
bona fide. The Respondent is engaged in “typosquatting”. Finally, the Complainant submits that the Complainant is well known throughout the world, and...MICHELIN trademark registrations predate the registration date of the Domain Name. The Domain Name constitutes a typosquatting variant of the Complainant’s...
2022-08-18 - Case Details
letter “i” does not eliminate the fact that the Complainant’s trademark remains recognizable. This is a case of typosquatting. The generic Top-Level Domain...Complainant’s trademark EQUINOR with a typo by adding the letter “i”. This is a typical case of typosquatting, which is designed to confuse users (Redbox...
2023-06-21 - Case Details
“typosquatting”. No rights or legitimate interests According to Complainant, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. Respondent does...traffic which is intended for Complainant. It is established case law that typosquatting constitutes unfair use and is the opposite of a legitimate...
2015-07-22 - Case Details
typosquatting. See RX America, L.L.C. v. Tony Rodolakis, WIPO Case No. D2005-1190 . The practice of typosquatting intentionally takes advantage of Internet users...similar by design. See RX America, L.L.C. v. Tony Rodolakis, supra (referring to intentional misspellings as "typosquatting", which "has consistently been...
2016-11-17 - Case Details
confusingly similar to its referenced trademarks. Complainant states that this is a case of “typosquatting”, as the referenced marks are included and...recognizable in the Domain Name with the exception of the deletion of the letter “o” from the term “zions”. Respondent has engaged in such “typosquatting” to...
2017-06-15 - Case Details
Notably, Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name reflects typosquatting and that Respondent is impersonating Complainant by including...found such typosquatting to be confusingly similar to a complainant trademark. WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition...
2024-02-15 - Case Details
typosquatting. Rights or Legitimate Interest The Complainant submits that the Respondent is not using the Disputed Domain Name to offer bona fide goods or...the registration of a typosquatting domain name is itself evidence of bad faith; and iv) the Respondent has a history of typosquatting. B. Respondent...
2011-02-07 - Case Details