The Domain Name resolves to a website containing several hyperlinks, such as “Losango Visa Credit” and “Losango Check Account.” These hyperlinks direct the user to other web pages pertaining to financial services unrelated to Complainant.
5. ...
2019-02-26 - Case Details
The email annexed to the Complaint invited the recipient to contact what purported to be a United States of America lawyer to arrange visa and other formalities. The Complainant contends that this has most likely been in furtherance of what has become a commonplace fraud whereby applicants for jobs are deceived into making payments in respect of job offers that have no genuine connection with the purported employer.
...
2017-04-20 - Case Details
Domännamnet är identiskt med eller liknar en rättighet, vilken har rättsgrund i Sverige och till vilken Sökanden kan visa rätt
Tvistlösaren konstaterar att Sökanden till stöd för sitt yrkande om överföring av domännamnet , vad gäller likhet som rättsgrund för sitt yrkande, särskilt har anfört sitt innehav av varumärket INDIAN MOTORCYCLE, registrerat den 22 februari 2005, USPTO registreringsnummer 2927365 (“Repair and maintenace of motorcycles”), och det den 26 augusti 2013 under nummer 011695723 EUIPO-registrerade varumärket INDIAN MOTORCYCLE, avseende klasserna 12 (“Motorcyklar och konstruktionsdelar till dem”) och 25 (här exakt återgivet: “Kläder, Nämligen, Skjortor, Kavajer, Trosor, Bälten, handskar, Hattar, Stänkskydd, Fotbeklädnader”).
...
2018-06-01 - Case Details
The Respondent also rebuts the Complainant’s contentions that the Respondent may be engaging in
“fraudulent activity such as impersonating a complainant’s employees [and] providing fake job
4 opportunities” and states that it is providing real job opportunities to real candidates, as shown by a letter
attached to the Response as Annex 7 addressed by the Respondent to the United States Citizenship
page 5
Immigration Services to support the VISA application of a third party that the Respondent was apparently
willing to employ as consultant.
6. ...The invoice and the correspondence submitted in Annexes 9 and 12, dated April and May 2024, i.e. before
the Respondent’s receipt of the notice from the Complainant’s representative, show that an immigration
lawyer was apparently entrusted with the preparation and filing of a petition for a Non-Immigrant Visa for a
third party to be employed by the Respondent’s company. However, the Respondent has not submitted
evidence of use of the name Synechron Technologies for the actual provision of products or services nor any
other evidence showing that its business is actually (and commonly) known to third parties as Synechron
Technologies.
...
2024-12-23 - Case Details
The Respondent willfully adopted the GILEAD and GILEAD
SCIENCES marks within the disputed domain name in an attempt to unfairly capitalize on the valuable
goodwill the Complainant has built in its marks and with the intention of using the disputed domain name in a
potential visa fraud scam.
The Respondent is not associated or affiliated with the Complainant. The Complainant has not granted any
rights to the Respondent to use the GILEAD or GILEAD SCIENCES marks, whether a license to sell any
products or offer any services, or any rights to register the disputed domain name.
...
2025-10-22 - Case Details
The website accessed by the domain name in dispute contains links to websites offering the goods and services of the Complainant and its competitors and also displays images of the Complainant's competitors Visa and Discover. Exhibited to the Complaint is a printout of one of the linked websites and a step-by-step guide to reaching the competing website through the website accessed by the domain name in dispute (Exhibit L to the Complaint).
...
2009-11-30 - Case Details
Rättigheter eller legitima intressen
Paragraf 4(c) i Policyn innehåller en lista över omständigheter under vilka Svaranden kan visa rättigheter
eller legitima intressen i ett omtvistat domännamn.
Även om den övergripande bevisbördan i UDRP-förfaranden ligger på den klagande, har paneler fastställt att
bevisning av att en svarande saknar rättigheter eller legitima intressen i förhållande till ett domännamn kan
resultera i den svåra uppgiften att “bevisa något negativt”, vilket kräver information som ofta främst ligger
inom svarandens kunskap eller kontroll. ...
2024-07-03 - Case Details
Argumentation des parties
A. Requérant
Le Requérant, au visa de l’article 12.1 de la Charte, fait état des droits de propriété intellectuelle qu’il détient sur le signe “Converse” (marques, dénomination sociale, nom commercial et noms de domaines antérieurs). ...
2008-04-18 - Case Details
Factual Background
Complainant, incorporated in 2000, is one of the leading Spanish companies in payment systems through its ATM network. Complainant markets the MasterCard and the Visa cards. Complainant has over 13.5 million customers.
Complainant owns the following Community trademark registrations with the OHIM - Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market:
6 EURO 6000 (figurative), No. 001431287, filing date April 14, 2000, registration date July 27, 2001;
EURO 6000 (figurative), No. 000151738, filing date August 7, 1996, registration date January 18, 2000;
EURO 6000 (word mark), No. 000151704, filing date August 6, 1996, registration date April 24, 2002.
...
2007-02-01 - Case Details
The website invites payment for entry to the advertised lottery by way of well-known service providers such as Mastercard, Visa, American Express and PayPal amongst others. A copyright notice at the foot of the page reads: “Copyright © 2015 www.Caesars4d.com.”
...
2021-11-16 - Case Details
Le Requérant analyse également les faits en cause au regard du principe de la marque de renommée au visa de l’article L.713-5 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle.
Il souligne par ailleurs que le Défendeur a utilisé des coordonnées manifestement erronées lors de l’enregistrement du nom de domaine litigieux.
...
2011-01-27 - Case Details
Dès lors, et sans qu’il soit besoin d’examiner les autres moyens soulevé par le Requérant fondés notamment sur les marques et noms de domaine sur lesquels il invoque des droits, l’Expert estime que l’enregistrement et l’utilisation du nom de domaine contesté dans les conditions décrites ci-dessus constituent des actes de concurrence déloyale du chef de détournement de la dénomination sociale du Requérant, sous le visa de l’article 1382 du Code Civil.
Voir Artcurial contre Kangaroo,
Litige OMPI No. DFR2004-0004: “… le Requérant est bien fondé à invoquer la réservation et utilisation abusive, à titre de nom de domaine, de sa marque et dénomination sociale Artcurial, à laquelle une indéniable renommée est attachée. ...
2007-11-19 - Case Details
Dès lors, et sans qu’il soit besoin d’examiner les autres moyens soulevé par le Requérant fondés notamment sur les marques et noms de domaine sur lesquels il invoque des droits, l’Expert estime que l’enregistrement et l’utilisation du nom de domaine contesté dans les conditions décrites ci-dessus constituent des actes de concurrence déloyale du chef de détournement de la dénomination sociale du Requérant, sous le visa de l’article 1382 du Code Civil.
Voir Artcurial contre Kangaroo,
Litige OMPI No. DFR2004-0004 : “… le Requérant est bien fondé à invoquer la réservation et utilisation abusive, à titre de nom de domaine, de sa marque et dénomination sociale Artcurial, à laquelle une indéniable renommée est attachée. ...
2007-11-19 - Case Details
Dès lors, et sans qu’il soit besoin d’examiner les autres moyens soulevé par le Requérant fondés notamment sur les marques et noms de domaine sur lesquels il invoque des droits, l’Expert estime que l’utilisation du nom de domaine contesté dans les conditions décrites ci-dessus constituent des actes de concurrence déloyale du chef de détournement de la dénomination sociale du Requérant, sous le visa de l’article 1382 du Code Civil.
Voir Artcurial contre Kangaroo,
Litige OMPI No. DFR2004-0004 : “… le Requérant est bien fondé à invoquer la réservation et utilisation abusive, à titre de nom de domaine, de sa marque et dénomination sociale Artcurial, à laquelle une indéniable renommée est attachée. ...
2007-11-19 - Case Details
Moreover, the Complainant has submitted evidence that the Respondent has also registered a number of domains that incorporate the trademark of the Complainant’s main competitor, VISA. Accordingly, the Complainant has demonstrated that the Respondent has repeatedly engaged in bad faith registration and use of domain names, which serves to reinforce the Panel’s decision that the Respondent’s use and registration in this case is in bad faith in violation of paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy.
...
2007-10-19 - Case Details
The disputed domain name, at least for a certain period, has been used for a directory of PPC links,
including some showing products identical and/or similar to the goods and services covered by the
Complainant’s trademark registrations, and offered by the Complainant’s competitors (e.g., Visa Travel
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 4
Money).
While the disputed domain name may no longer resolve to an active website, under the circumstances of this
proceeding, the non-use of the disputed domain name does not prevent the Panel’s finding of bad faith
under the doctrine of “passive holding”. ...
2022-06-08 - Case Details
The Panel further finds that the use which the Respondent has made of the disputed domain name until recently, i.e., to effectively pass itself off as the Complainant apparently in an attempt to recruit or involve unsuspecting members of the public in its activities of an apparently illegal nature constitutes use of the disputed domain name in bad faith (e.g., Visa Europe ltd. v. Sophie Dupont,
WIPO Case No. D2014-0119). The fact that the Respondent has recently ceased to use the disputed domain name for these activities does not prevent a finding of use of bad faith.
...
2018-09-10 - Case Details
In emails sent from the Disputed Domain Name, customers of the Complainant are directed to provide their credit card details including the credit/debit card number, type of card (Visa/Master/Amex), expiration on the card, CVC number, bank of card, and name on card to the Respondent.
...
2020-03-16 - Case Details
Please utiliser la carte de crédit Master à payer, la carte de crédit VISA est temporairement fermé. Les produits sont de qualité authentique et des emballages originaux. Nous allons fournir la qualité et le meilleur service. ...
2019-09-25 - Case Details
To the Panel’s mind it is further obvious that the use which the Respondent makes of the disputed domain name to effectively pass itself off as the Complainant, apparently so as to obtain payments from Internet users as a result of the intentionally created confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademarks, constitutes use of the disputed domain name in bad faith (e.g. Visa Europe ltd. contre Sophie Dupont,
WIPO Case No. D2014-0119).
Consequently, the third and last element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is also met.
7. ...
2017-11-02 - Case Details