About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Biennial IFCAI Conference

October 24, 1997, Geneva, Switzerland

 

Opening Statement
Mr. Michael Hoellering
President, International Federation of Commercial Arbitration Institutions (IFCAI)
General Counsel, American Arbitration Association (AAA)
New York, United States of America


It is my great pleasure to welcome you, on behalf of the International Federation of Commercial Arbitration Institutions (IFCAI), to this fourth biennial IFCAI Conference.

We are privileged that this program is being held here in Geneva, under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a city so richly endowed with the history of international commercial arbitration, and an institution whose Arbitration and Mediation Center, in so short a time, has earned the high regard of the international arbitration community. We are most grateful to WIPO, and the Swiss Arbitration Association (ASA), for their support of this Conference and of the Federation’s organizational mission.

Those who have attended prior IFCAI conferences know that they are stimulating events, but also works in progress. In Cairo, the focus was on that region of the world and the role of arbitral organizations in facilitating a fair and effective arbitration process. In Milan, we were admonished that arbitral institutions must help settle disputes effectively, and to the same standards of efficiency as are applied to other business transactions. Administering institutions were counseled to seek feedback from their users and periodically review their internal processes with a view to constant improvement. The discussions in Hong Kong focused on the harmonization and globalization of the basic notions in international arbitration. We departed with a sense of the commonality of basic values, the importance of supportive national judicial institutions, and the need for freedom and flexibility to accommodate diversity. Today, in the spirit of Milan, we will address the further evolution of arbitration rules, recent institutional reforms, and consider some judicial perspectives.

I need not remind so sophisticated an audience of practitioners, arbitrators, administrators and jurists that achieving consistently effective transnational dispute resolution is not a solitary exercise. We very much hope need your feedback, constructive criticisms, and innovative ideas. It is only with your help and active participation in these discussions that the efforts of the arbitral institutions to provide disputing parties with the best possible dispute resolution services will be fully realized.

 

Back to Biennial IFCAI Conference Index