About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Biennial IFCAI Conference

October 24, 1997, Geneva, Switzerland

 

The Relationship between the Courts and the Arbitral Process
Mr. B.W. Vigrass (Chairman)
Consultant Director, London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
(London, United Kingdom)


This morning we listened to representatives of institutions about their rules and procedures and we heard from users about their requirements. This afternoon we are turning to the national courts and their relationship to the arbitral process. We shall try to define the proper limits of judicial intervention and also the assistance which the courts can give to the arbitral process. One of the subtitles to this session is "How a-national can an international arbitration be?" I am reminded by this subtitle of the Centenary Conference of the London Court of International Arbitration in 1993, whose theme was "The Internationalization of International Arbitration." When we looked back over 100 years of arbitration and also tried to look into the future, one of the key issues identified at that Conference was the future relationship between the national courts and the arbitral process, and this is also our subject today.

We are very fortunate in having two very distinguished speakers to discuss this subject. One is the Honorable Justice Verma, the Chief Justice of India, who came over yesterday to attend this meeting and is going back tomorrow morning, so his sole purpose of being here is to talk to you, for which we are most grateful. The other is Mr. Austin Amissah, who is the President of the Appeal Court of Botswana and from whom we shall certainly hear an excellent presentation.

After a rich and varied judicial career spanning 30 years, our first speaker was appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India in March of this year. When sitting as a Judge of the Supreme Court, he was in charge of the inquiry covering the circumstances surrounding the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, the former Prime Minister of India, which was called the Verma Commission.

I shall invite both speakers to present their papers and then we will open the session to discussion.

 

Back to Biennial IFCAI Conference Index