About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO Second Domain Name Process

logo

 

Dr Kamil Idris
Director General
World Intellectual Property Organization
PO Box 18
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland

 

Dear Dr Idris

In February 2000, the Australian Government convened a working group of officials from interested governments, public authorities and international organizations to discuss the issues raised by cybersquatting.

The meeting discussed issues concerning registration practices for both generic top level domains (gTLDs) and country code top level domains (ccTLDs ). It also discussed the current legal situation internationally in relation to the recognition of rights and the use of names in the Internet domain name system, including protection against cybersquatting, and identified areas of continued uncertainty.

The meeting noted that areas of continuing concern coincided, in a number of instances, with those that the Final Report of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Internet domain name process, The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues, recognized as requiring further study. The Members ofWIPO, as listed in the Attachment, request the organization to initiate a study of, and develop recommendations in relation to, these issues.

We envisage that the scope of this study would explore the issues raised, in the domain name space, inter alia by bad faith, abusive, misleading or unfair use of:

- Personal names;
- International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances;
- Names of international intergovernmental organizations;
- Geographical indications, geographical terms, or indications of source; and
- Tradenames.

This activity should take full advantage of WIPO’s prior work and build on existing and ongoing discussions while allowing for a process of consultation with WIPO Members and all interested stakeholders. Further, in undertaking this process, it would be beneficial if any information received or collected concerning technical solutions to domain name collision control was collated for the information of WIPO Members and the Internet community.

These findings and recommendations should be submitted to the Members of WIPO and for consideration by the Internet community (including the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers). We recognize this work would be undertaken as partial fulfilment of subprogram 03.4. Electronic Commerce and Intellectual Property, of the 2000-2001 Program and Budget, and look forward to its results.

Yours sincerely

Richard Alston

RICHARD ALSTON

Minister for Communications,
Information Technology and the Arts

 


ATTACHMENT

Members of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) who request that WIPO initiate a study of, and develop recommendations in relation to, areas of continued uncertainty including the protection of personal and non-protected names within the domain name system:

Argentina
Australia
Canada
Denmark
European Union
France
United States of America

We understand that the Government of Brazil will also communicate its support for this letter through its diplomatic mission in Geneva.