Science and Technology Cluster Ranking 2024

The Science and Technology (S&T) Cluster ranking of the Global Innovation Index identifies local concentrations of world-leading science and technology activity. S&T clusters are established through the analysis of patent-filing activity and scientific article publication, documenting the geographical areas around the world with the highest density of inventors and scientific authors.
WIPO locates and ranks science and technology clusters through a geocoding method, mapping addresses and names pulled from documents to 96% accuracy. Find out more about the S&T Cluster methodology.
Image
play_circle
Video: Top 10 Science & Technology Clusters 2024

Top 100 Science and Technology Clusters worldwide 2024

Source: WIPO Statistics Database, April 2024. Orange points refer to top 100 S&T clusters. Blue points (noise) refer to all inventor/author locations not classified in a cluster.

Main findings

The world’s five biggest S&T clusters are all located in East AsiaTokyo-Yokohama (Japan) leads as the largest global S&T cluster, followed by Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou (China and Hong Kong, China), Beijing (China), Seoul (Republic of Korea) and Shanghai-Suzhou (China) clusters. When combined, Tokyo–Yokohama and Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou account for almost one in every five PCT applications filed globally.
The Cambridge cluster in the United Kingdom and San Jose-San Francisco, CA in the United States are found to be the clusters with the most intensive S&T activity, in proportion to population density, followed by Eindhoven (Netherlands), Oxford (UK) and Boston–Cambridge (US).
The top 100 S&T clusters continue to be predominantly located in three regions: North America, Europe, and Asia, with a particular concentration in two key economies: China and the United States. China, for the second consecutive year, leads with the most clusters (26) in the top 100. Followed by the United States (20), Germany (8), India and Republic of Korea each with 4 clusters. San Jose–San Francisco is the leading cluster for the US, Munich for Germany, Bengaluru for India, and Seoul for the Republic of Korea.
This year four clusters entered the top 100 for the first time: Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) ranked 93rd, Nanchang (China, 94th), Cairo (Egypt, 95th)- also the sole cluster within Africa, Kunming (China, 98th) and Macao Special Administrative Region of China–Zhuhai (Macao SAR–Zhuhai) at 100th.
Several middle-income economies (other than China) also experienced strong S&T output growth. Cairo (Egypt) had the highest growth rate for this group at 10.9 percent. Chennai (India) with 7.8 percent and Istanbul (Turkey) with 7.5 percent.
Half of all PCT applications in the top 100 clusters fall within 7 fields of technology. These fields being: Computer technology (12%), Digital communication (11.5%), Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy (6.6%), Medical technology (6.5%), Audio–visual technology (4.7%), Measurement (4.6%) and Pharmaceuticals (4.5%); of which the top 10 clusters contribute 65% to the overall total.
PCT applications within the electrical engineering fields are highly concentrated in Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou (70% of total cluster, also highest volume overall), Beijing (70%), San Diego (71%) and Seattle (72%).

Top 100 Science and Technology Cluster briefs 2024

Rank Cluster Economy Brief
1 Tokyo–Yokohama Japan
2 Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou China, Hong Kong, China
3 Beijing China
4 Seoul Republic of Korea
5 Shanghai–Suzhou China
6 San Jose–San Francisco, CA United States
7 Osaka–Kobe–Kyoto Japan
8 Boston–Cambridge, MA United States
9 Nanjing China
10 San Diego, CA United States
11 New York City, NY United States
12 Paris France
13 Wuhan China
14 Hangzhou China
15 Nagoya Japan
16 Los Angeles, CA United States
17 Daejeon Republic of Korea
18 Xian China
19 Washington, DC-Baltimore, MD United States
20 Qingdao China
21 London United Kingdom
22 Munich Germany
23 Chengdu China
24 Seattle, WA United States
25 Taipei–Hsinchu Taiwan (Province of China)
26 Amsterdam–Rotterdam Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
27 Cologne Germany
28 Houston, TX United States
29 Stuttgart Germany
30 Tel Aviv–Jerusalem Israel
31 Moscow Russian Federation
32 Changsha China
33 Singapore Singapore/Malaysia
34 Tianjin China
35 Philadelphia, PA United States
36 Hefei China
37 Chicago, IL United States
38 Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of)
39 Chongqing China
40 Stockholm Sweden
41 Minneapolis, MN United States
42 Eindhoven Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
43 Frankfurt am Main Germany
44 Sydney Australia
45 Berlin Germany
46 Melbourne Australia
47 Harbin China
48 Madrid Spain
49 Jinan China
50 Zürich Switzerland
51 Raleigh, NC United States
52 Milan Italy
53 Brussels–Antwerp Belgium
54 Toronto Canada
55 Barcelona Spain
56 Bengaluru India
57 Copenhagen Denmark
58 Changchun China
59 Istanbul Türkiye
60 Denver, CO United States
61 Shenyang China
62 Montreal Canada
63 Delhi India
64 Heidelberg–Mannheim Germany
65 Dalian China
66 Cambridge United Kingdom
67 Rome Italy
68 Zhengzhou China
69 Atlanta, GA United States
70 Dallas, TX United States
71 Helsinki Finland
72 Xiamen China
73 São Paulo Brazil
74 Vienna Austria
75 Nuremberg–Erlangen Germany
76 Portland, OR United States
77 Zhenjiang China
78 Oxford United Kingdom
79 Pittsburgh, PA United States
80 Lanzhou China
81 Busan Republic of Korea
82 Chennai India
83 Ann Arbor, MI United States
84 Mumbai India
85 Fuzhou China
86 Ankara Türkiye
87 Cincinnati, OH United States
88 Daegu Republic of Korea
89 Vancouver Canada
90 Warsaw Poland
91 Austin, TX United States
92 Lyon France
93 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
94 Nanchang China
95 Cairo Egypt
96 Basel Switzerland/Germany/France
97 Brisbane Australia
98 Kunming China
99 Göteborg Sweden
100 Macao SAR–Zhuhai China
For ongoing work on assisting countries to measure and improve innovation at the sub-national level see the WIPO toolkit on "Enabling Innovation Measurement at the Sub-National Level" and the dedicated WIPO General Assemblies Side Event.