About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Creation

Reference

Title: Why don't plants innovate? Findings from the Survey of Innovation 2005
Author: Susan Schaan and Frances Anderson [Statistics Canada]
Source:

Innovation Analysis Bulletin 10, no. 1: 11-12
http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/88-003-XIE/88-003-XIE2008001.pdf

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Innovation
Focus: Barriers, Success Factors
Country/Territory: Canada
Objective: To enquire about the reasons why non-innovative manufacturing plants do not innovate.
Sample: 6.143 CEOs or senior managers in the manufacturing industry
Methodology: Mail questionnaire

Main Findings

From 2002 to 2004, one third (35%) of manufacturing plants did not innovate. Reasons given for not innovating are: "lack of market demand" (51.7% of non-innovative plants), followed by "lack of funds" (28.4%), "innovations carried out prior to 2002 to 2004" (26.6%), "lack of trained staff" (24%) and "other reasons" (19.9%).

The study authors contend that some of the non-innovative manufacturing plants citing "other reasons" may in fact still be innovative: by creating custom products according to customer specifications or orders (and thus focusing on process innovation, rather than product innovation); by being part of a larger firm whose innovation activities take place elsewhere; and by adopting incremental changes (especially in "traditional industries" where technology and operations change in small steps).

While both innovative and non-innovative plants considered "satisfying existing clients" the most important success factor for their plants, their ratings of other success factors were significantly different: "developing new domestic markets" (24.2% of innovators versus 14.4% of non-innovators); "developing domestic markets" (31.6% versus 22.9%); "developing niche or specialised markets" (37.2% versus 23.6%); "seeking new markets (39.7% versus 24.2%); and "developing customer-designed products for clients" (45.1% versus 26.8%).

Non-innovative plants are not expected to be innovative in the near future, as few non-innovators reported having carried out innovation activities during the reference period. Only small percentages of non-innovators engaged in activities to develop innovations that were still ongoing at the end of 2004 (13.4%), or that were abandoned during the survey reference period (6.5%).

[Date Added: Aug 18, 2008 ]