About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Are patents important? Evidence from the UK CIS 3
Author: Henrique M Barros [University of Warwick]
Source:

2004 DRUID Summer Conference on industrial dynamics, innovation and development Papers
http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds2004-1336.pdf

Year: 2004

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Patents
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To investigate the determinants of the importance of patents as a protective mechanism in UK manufacturing industry.
Sample: 3.440 British manufacturing firms
Methodology: Analysis of Community Innovation Survey (CIS 3)-based data

Main Findings

The importance of patents to UK manufacturing firms is found to be influenced by several factors: firm size (the larger the firm, the more importance it will place on patents; still, being small does not preclude a firm from regarding patents as important, provided that it is innovative); innovative capacity (more innovative firms seem to regard patents as more important than less innovative ones do); partnerships with universities and government support (depending on the agents engaged in these activities, firms with university partnerships/government support are more likely to consider patents of high importance than firms without this type of partnerships); degree of competition (a more competitive environment may be conducive to greater importance for patents).

Another important factor is appropriation strategy: firms with pro-active appropriation strategies (those according high importance to mechanisms of appropriability allowing them to protect their innovations) tend to rank patents as more important than those firms for which such mechanisms are only of marginal importance. This seems to indicate that patents work as a complement to other appropriability mechanisms, such as registrations of design, trademarks, confidentiality agreements, copyright, secrecy, complexity of design, and lead-time advantage on competitors. The importance of patents also varies across industrial sectors, with appropriability being especially important in: pharmaceuticals; chemicals; medical, precision and optical instruments; machinery, and communication equipments.

In view of these findings, the main objective of UK manufacturers taking out patents seems to be to exercise property rights over their inventions. The combination of patents with other appropriability mechanisms can collectively strengthen the overall appropriability of innovations.

[Date Added: Aug 13, 2008 ]