About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Looking for Leadership: Canadian Attitudes Toward Intellectual Property
Author: [Environics Research Group]
Source:

http://erg.environics.net/media_room/default.asp?aID=673

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: IP Knowledge, IP Protection
Focus: Copyright, Economic / Financial Impact, Enforcement, Outreach / Education
Country/Territory: Canada
Objective: To examine Canadian attitudes toward intellectual property protection.
Sample: 2.724 randomly selected Canadians aged 15+
Methodology: In-home, self completion questionnaire

Main Findings

The study identified three groups with distinct attitudes towards intellectual property (IP) and downloading, collectively representing about half of the Canadian population: firstly, representing 16% of Canadians, the "moralists" (who refuse piracy and illegal downloading categorically, which they consider a serious crime, and whose strong moral convictions make them very unlikely to abuse IP, even in the absence of official rules); secondly, representing 5% of Canadians, the "unrepentant downloaders" (who feel no compunction about illegal downloading and abusing IP, which they consider "not a very serious crime", and whose focus on new and exciting experiences drives them to do what they want, regardless of the rules); thirdly, representing 25% of Canadians, the "impressionables" (who are aware of the economic importance of IP and support strong IP laws, but nevertheless consider piracy "not a serious crime", and who rely on cues from others - peers, government, employers, parents - to know what behaviour is acceptable and what is not).

Given the strong influence of the social context on the third group, the authors highlight that political leadership and clear rules (a sound legal and economic framework) are crucial in shaping a society in which the impressionables sense that the abuse of IP is no longer tolerated.

Overall, the vast majority of Canadians (83%) believes that IP deserves the same respect and protection (from theft) as other, more tangible, physical goods. Nine in ten Canadians agree that "strong patent, copyright and trademark laws are required to protect those who create intellectual property for a period of time so that they can sell of commercialise their ideas before competitors are allowed to copy their creations".

Apart from their support voiced for the creation and enforcement of laws that protect IP, most respondents (82%) also support a proactive government role in educating Canadians about the need to respect intellectual property, particularly online.

Canadians believe that respect for creative work should be fostered among young people (which are found to be considerably more permissive with regard to plagiarism and cheating, when compared to Canadians overall). Accordingly, Canadians overwhelmingly agree that parents should actively promote responsible online behaviour: the beliefs that "parents should teach their children how to use the Internet in a responsible fashion" (93%) and that "parents should be responsible for monitoring the use of the Internet by their children" (91%) are almost universally accepted. Nearly two in three respondents (64%) support holding parents accountable if their children engage in illegal downloading.

When asked about the link between IP and economic success, 93% of respondents agree that "the creation of IP is essential for Canada's long-term economic growth and prosperity". More than 80% recognise the role of material incentives in encouraging IP creation, agreeing that "those who create intellectual property would have little incentive to do so if competitors could immediately copy and sell the creations as their own".

The consensus in Canadian society about the value, the need for protection, and the economic importance of IP is very broad, with remarkably little variation in opinion according to political affiliations.

[Date Added: Aug 18, 2008 ]