About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: The use of patents and the protection of intellectual property in the Canadian manufacturing industry
Author: Mark Uhrbach [Statistics Canada]
Source:

Innovation Analysis Bulletin 10, no. 1: 13-15
http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/88-003-XIE/88-003-XIE2008001.pdf

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Patents
Country/Territory: Canada
Objective: To examine the use of patents by Canadian manufacturing plants.
Sample: 6.143 CEOs or senior managers in the manufacturing industry
Methodology: Mail questionnaire

Main Findings

During the 2002 to 2004 period, 76.4% of Canadian manufacturing plants used some method to protect their intellectual property (IP). Strategic methods of protecting IP proved most popular among Canadian manufacturers: 42.4% used lead-time advantage over competitors, 40.4% used secrecy, and 33.8% used complexity of design. 21.7% reported using patents, and 12.2% reported having applied for a new patent between 2002 and 2004.

The larger a manufacturing plant, the more likely it is to use patents as a protection mechanism for its IP: 37.4% of large plants, 29.4% of medium-sized plants, and just 17.9% of small plants reported using patents. However, this does not mean that smaller plants do not protect their IP: about 60% of large, medium-sized and also small plants used at least one strategic method of IP protection.

Innovators are more likely to use patents than non-innovators: over one in four innovative plants (27.9%) used patents, while only one in ten non-innovative plants (10.2%) did so. Among different manufacturing subsectors, patent use varies considerably: its level was highest in "computer and electronic product manufacturing", "electrical equipment, appliance and component manufacturing" and "plastics and rubber products manufacturing"; its level was lowest in "printing and related support activities" and "wood product manufacturing".

[Date Added: Aug 18, 2008 ]