About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Consumer Demand for Counterfeit Goods
Author: Gail Tom, Barbara Garibaldi, Yvette Zeng and Julie Pilcher [California State University]
Source:

Psychology & Marketing 15, no. 5: 405-421

Year: 1998

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Apparel and Shoes, Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Fashion Accessories, Music, Software
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To identify counterfeit-product prone consumers and the product attributes that attract them.
Sample: 453 consumers at shopping malls and 379 shoppers at flea markets
Methodology: Three street-intercept studies undertaken before, during and after purchases took place. For the during-purchase studies, consumers were given the option to purchase clearly-marked fake and real products at the same stand

Main Findings

Younger consumers shopping at flea markets showed a more positive attitude towards counterfeit goods than older consumers found at shopping malls. Previous purchase of counterfeit goods also tended to result in favourable attitudes towards counterfeits. Some consumers of counterfeit goods saw their purchase as an expression of their anti-big-business sentiments and did not believe that counterfeit goods hurt the US economy as a whole.

When presented with a choice between the fake and the legitimate version of a product, 68% chose the legitimate product. Those preferring the legitimate product tended to rate brand, function and durability as the most important attributes. Those preferring the fake product tended to rate price as the most important attribute. Counterfeit versions of products with a greater functional component were selected less frequently than counterfeit products with a greater fashion component.

A small section of the population seems to be responsible for a large proportion of the sales in counterfeit goods. Suggest anti-counterfeiting efforts to target this audience who tends to be loyal to counterfeit goods.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]