About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Terça edição da pesquisa sobre o impacto da pirataria no setor de consumo
Author: [IBOPE]
Source:

Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FIRJAN)
http://www.firjan.org.br/lumis/portal/file/fileDownload.jsp?fileId=2C908CE9215B0DC4012163A14F37666B

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Apparel and Shoes, Brands (deceptive counterfeits), Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Fashion Accessories, Personal Care Products, Toys, Video Games, Watches
Country/Territory: Brazil
Objective: To measure the consumption of counterfeits and to evaluate attitudes towards them.
Sample: 2,226 Brazilians aged 16+ in São Paulo (602), Rio de Janeiro (602), Belo Horizonte (511) and Recife (511)
Methodology: Interviews

Main Findings

In 2007, 73% of Brazilian consumers have purchased pirated/counterfeited goods at least „infrequently”. 27% report never buying counterfeits. 80% agree that counterfeiting hurts big brands that as a consequence invest less and generate less employment; 71% agree that buying fakes deprives the government of revenues it could spend for health, education or housing. 56% of consumers are confident that they can at least in the majority of times distinguish between the original and the pirated product.

72% of counterfeit buyers reportedly only buy counterfeit goods when their financial situation does not permit them to acquire the genuine alternatives. 79% worry most about quality when buying counterfeits. Buying fakes tends to be socially acceptable, albeit with limits: 36% of counterfeit good consumers report feeling bad when buying fakes because it is not right to do so; 16% feel ashamed and avoid telling anybody that they purchased fake products; 64% do not consider buying counterfeits as a form of protest against the rich and powerful; 53% do not take pride in letting other persons know about how much money they supposedly “saved” by opting for the counterfeit, rather than the original.

During the last 12 months, counterfeit buyers have most often acquired the following items: clothes (19%), toys (16%), batteries (12%), sports shoes (10%), watches (10%), sunglasses (10%), fashion accessories (8%), pens (7%), video games (6%), and perfumes (5%).

[Date Added: Mar 12, 2010 ]