About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Combate à Pirataria começa na escola
Author: Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FIRJAN)
Year: 2006

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Apparel and Shoes, Consumer Electronics / Electronic Equipment, Fashion Accessories, Film, Medicines and Medical Devices, Music, Software, Toys, Watches
Country/Territory: Brazil
Objective: To measure adolescents' consumption of and attitudes towards counterfeit and pirated goods.
Sample: 433 adolescents aged 14-24
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

93.8% of Brazilian adolescents admit to purchasing counterfeit and pirated goods, in particular CDs (82%), DVDs (60%), pens/scissors (38%), watches (37%), consumer electronics (31%), software (31%), clothes (30%), fashion accessories (26%), shoes (24%), sunglasses (23%), and toys (21%). Their families most frequently buy pirated CDs and DVDs, watches, fashion accessories, clothes and toys.

Top reasons given for buying fake goods are: “high price of the original” (85.5%), “quicker availability of fakes” (for example for CDs/DVDs; 45.9%), “cannot afford the original” (40.6%), “saving money” (33.7%), and “fake is of same quality as original” (25.7%).

Awareness of potential health and/or performance risks related to fake products is relatively high as evidenced by 71.6% who know that fake products may not work as expected, or not work at all, and 60.3% who say they are informed about the potentially lethal risk of counterfeit medicines. Respondents partially agree that piracy and counterfeiting are linked to organized crime.

Information campaigns would stop 17.6% from buying fake goods. 50.8% say that such campaigns would not affect their purchasing habits. By contrast, 62.6% of respondents would inform their friends and family if they knew more about the negative consequences of fakes.

[Date Added: Mar 12, 2010 ]