About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Report on a Public Opinion Survey on a Graduated Response System Approach to Online Copyright Infringement
Author: [APCO Asia Ltd]
Source:

International Federation Against Copyright Theft - Greater China (IFA©T-GC)
http://www.ifact-gc.org/press_releases/2010/IFACT-SurveyReportSummary2010-04-28.pdf

Year: 2010

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Film, Music, Software, Video Games
Country/Territory: Hong Kong, China
Objective: To gauge the public’s views on the "graduated response systems" approach and internet usage.
Sample: 1,000 members of the general public aged between 15 and 60
Methodology: Telephone Survey

Main Findings

60% of respondents reported downloading content from the Internet (movies, TV programs, music, games and software), much of which is downloaded without permission of the copyright owner: only 16% stated that their downloads did not infringe copyright. Music is the content most often downloaded (47.1%), followed by software (21.8%), movies (10%), TV programs (9.5%) and games (9.3%). Downloading unauthorized content is more prevalent among younger people (15-34 age group) than among older age groups (35 or above).

To combat downloading of unauthorized content, a majority of survey respondents (57.1%) supports the implementation of a graduated response system (deals with illegal online file sharing by an escalating series of educational notices and sanctions against identified repeat infringers). 71% said they would likely stop downloading unauthorized content if a graduated response system were introduced (12.5% would not). However, before they were told what a graduated response system was, only 13% said they had heard of it. Overall, 44.5% of respondents consider a graduated response system an effective way to stop illegal downloading, whereas 23.7% do not think so, and 26.1% are unsure.

[Date Added: May 6, 2010 ]