About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Counterfeiting in the United States: Consumer Behaviors and Attitudes (Focus on Los Angeles)
Author: [The Gallup Organization]
Source:

U.S. Chamber Global Intellectual Property Center

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Aircraft and Auto Parts, Apparel and Shoes, Beverages, Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Consumer Electronics / Electronic Equipment, Fashion Accessories, Film, Food Products, Medicines and Medical Devices, Music, Personal Care Products, Software, Tobacco Products, Toys, Video Games, Watches
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To understand the extent of counterfeit purchases in the last year, who buys them, the estimated loss of revenues by US manufacturers and the government, attitudes and perceptions towards counterfeiting and laws against it, and feelings and attitudes towards anti-counterfeiting messages.
Sample: 892 US adults aged 18 and older from the Los Angeles metropolitan area
Methodology: Computer-assisted telephone interviewing over three years

Main Findings

In Los Angeles, about 25% of adults report having bought some type of counterfeit product within the past 12 months, with pirated music/movies and brand name clothing/bags/footwear being most popular. The most common reasons given for buying pirated products rather than originals are: "easily available" (73%), "price for genuine product was too high" (58%), "wanted to buy same quality at better price" (43%).

Elements of anti-counterfeiting messages deemed most effective are: counterfeit products may be dangerous or defective; the trade in counterfeit goods helps fund terrorist activities/organised crime.

72% of respondents are in favour of stricter counterfeiting and piracy laws (only 3% favour making them less strict; 25% prefer to leave them as they are). Slightly over eight in ten respondents think that buying counterfeits should be illegal, and 65% approve of criminal penalties for knowingly buying counterfeit products.

[Date Added: Oct 22, 2008 ]