About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: An Application of Deterrence Theory to Software Piracy
Author: George E Higgins, Abby L Wilson and Brian D Fell [University of Louisville]
Source:

Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture 12, no. 3: 166-184
http://www.albany.edu/scj/jcjpc/vol12is3/featured%20article%202.pdf

Year: 2005

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Software
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To examine the effect of deterrence measures on software piracy.
Sample: 382 college students at a south-eastern university
Methodology: Self-report questionnaire

Main Findings

The following deterring factors were found to be most effective in reducing software piracy: certainty (an individual’s belief that this or her criminal behaviour will be detected), shame (self-disapproval/self-stigma), and family disapproval (social disapproval/social stigma). Severity of punishment, however, was not an important deterrent.

Furthermore, the study found that low self-control (inability of the individual to resist a temptation toward criminal behaviour/piracy when an opportunity for it exists) and deviant peer association (association with deviant/criminal/pirating peers increases the likelihood or inclination for criminal behaviour/piracy) are positively linked to software piracy.

The authors give the following policy recommendations for law enforcement and legislators: develop proper procedures to detect and investigate piracy cases to increase the certainty of apprehension; assist law enforcement by passing a law requiring educational institutions to report every violation; ensure proper training, funding and equipment for prosecutor offices.

Educational institutions should: provide orientation sessions (making students aware of the certainty of software piracy apprehension, emphasising the shame that could arise from the detection and prosecution of software piracy, indicating the social embarrassment felt when an offender’s family is notified of software piracy infringements and the penalties that come with such criminal behaviour); provide pop-up windows on students’ computers reminding them of these issues after the orientation sessions; provide students with written literature about issues pertaining to software piracy (with a view to changing the culture thinking that software piracy is proper behaviour).

[Date Added: Oct 22, 2008 ]