About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: It's not really theft!: personal and workplace ethics that enable software piracy
Author: Darryl A Seale [University of Alabama in Huntsville], Michael Polakowski [University of Arizona] and Sherry Schneider [University of New South Wales]
Source:

Behaviour and Information Technology 17, no. 1: 27-40

Year: 1998

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Software
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To examine predictors of software piracy.
Sample: 589 university employees
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

While 44% of the respondents reported that they had received unauthorised software copies from their friends or relatives and 31% admitted to having made unauthorised copies of software, they estimated that about two thirds of computer owners would have unauthorised copies.

The strongest direct predictors of software piracy were the attitudes or social norms one holds concerning piracy behaviour (respondents agreeing that using unauthorised software is not really theft are significantly more likely to pirate). Other direct predictors of software copying are the perceptions of the expertise required to copy software (the more difficult somebody perceives piracy to be, the less likely this individual is to engage in it), gender (men are more likely to pirate than women) and computer usage (respondents reporting to use computers both at work and at home are more likely to pirate software).

The ease of theft (of software), people's sense of the proportional value of software (i.e. if individuals perceive software pricing as unfair, then they are likely to report social norms in favour of piracy) and various demographic variables (such as age or employment position) were found to influence software piracy indirectly.

Based on the authors' findings, possible avenues to reduce software piracy include: raising the perceived value of software or lowering its price and changing the public image of software pirates thorough a public relations campaign.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]