About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Creation

Reference

Title: Innovation in Australian Business 2006-07
Author: [Australian Bureau of Statistics]
Source:

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/8158.02006-07?OpenDocument

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Innovation
Focus: Barriers, Success Factors
Country/Territory: Australia
Objective: To get an overview of innovation activity and characteristics of Australian businesses.
Sample: Random sample of approximately 9.700 businesses
Methodology: Mail survey

Main Findings

During the year ended 30 June 2007, innovation-active businesses (businesses that had undertaken at least one type of innovation during the reference period) in Australia represented 36.8% of all businesses. Larger firms were more likely to be innovation-active than smaller ones.

The most innovation-active sectors were information media and telecommunications (with 52% of businesses innovating during 2006-07), followed by manufacturing (50%). The least innovative sectors were transport, postal and warehousing (29%), and construction (27%).

Non innovation-active respondents were far more likely to report no barriers to innovation (62.8%) than innovating businesses (38.3%). The most common barriers to innovation cited were: lack of skilled persons (cited as a factor hampering innovation by 34.5% of innovation-active businesses, and by 20.5% of non innovation-active ones), lack of access to additional funds (24.5% versus 10.8%), and cost of development or introduction/implementation (17.5% versus 7%).

The main drivers of innovation were profit related (reported by 75.9% of innovation-active businesses), competition/demand/market related (76.9%) or production/delivery related (58%). Within these categories, increasing responsiveness to customer needs came in first (with 52.3%), followed by increasing/maintaining market share (44.9%), and improving quality of goods/services (37.4%).

The most commonly reported sources of ideas or information for innovative activities were “within the business or related company” (cited by 55.5% of innovators), followed by “clients/customers/buyers” (44.1%), “websites/journals/research papers/publications” (31.8%), and “suppliers” (31.7%).

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]