About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Creation

Reference

Title: Community Innovation Survey 2004-2006 - First Findings
Author: [Central Statistics Office], [Forfás]
Source:

http://www.cso.ie/releasespublications/documents/information_tech/communityinnovation.pdf

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Innovation
Focus: Barriers, Impact
Country/Territory: Ireland
Objective: To collect information about business innovation in Ireland.
Sample: 4.150 survey forms issued to enterprises with 10 or more employees
Methodology: Postal survey

Main Findings

In the period 2004 to 2006 inclusive, more than 47% of Irish enterprises indicated that they were active innovators. The innovation activity rate was at 57% in the industrial sector, and at 41% in services. Overall, 33% of enterprises engaged in product innovations, while 30% engaged in process innovations; 2% had ongoing or abandoned innovation activities. Larger firms were more likely to be innovation active.

12.6% of turnover of all active and non-active innovators in 2006 was a result of product innovations in the 2004 to 2006 period. The percentage of total turnover attributed to product innovation activities increased with firm size. Spending on innovation activities was for machinery, equipment and software (41%), intramural R&D (38%), acquisition of external knowledge (15%), and extramural R&D (6%).

27% of innovation-active enterprises reported engaging in some cooperation activity when developing their innovations. Large firms were more likely to be involved in innovation partnerships. The most commonly cited innovation partners were: “equipment suppliers” (with 17% reporting an innovation cooperation with them), “within own group” (14%), and “clients/customers” (14%).

The most important barriers to innovation activities were: “lack of funds” (cited as hampering innovation by 18.6% of innovative enterprises, and by 12.5% of non-innovative enterprises), “innovation costs too high” (16.3% versus 11.3%), “market dominated by established enterprises” (14.9% versus 10.3%), “lack of external finance” (12.2% versus 7%), and “lack of qualified personnel” (10.1% versus 6.2%).

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]