About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Consumer Survey - Clothing & Footwear Sector
Author: [Ledbury Research]
Source:

Anti-Counterfeiting Group (ACG)
http://www.a-cg.org/guest/pdf/surveyc&f.pdf

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting
Focus: Apparel and Shoes, Brands (deceptive counterfeits), Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits)
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To understand the demographics, spending patterns and attitudes of consumers buying counterfeit clothing and footwear.
Sample: 1.023 representative UK adults aged 16+
Methodology: Online survey via e-mail invitation

Main Findings

29% of UK consumers admitted to having bought fake clothing/footwear during the past three years. 15% reported having done so in the past year (2006). Nearly one third of consumers may have unknowingly bought a fake. Overall, fake buyers were no different from the population as a whole. The most popular fakes were: t-shirts (with 30% of fake buyers having bought them), footwear (12%), jumpers/sweaters (9%), and tracksuits (6%).

Had the fake they had purchased been unavailable, 45% of fake buyers would not have bought anything, 39% would have bought a genuine alternative, and 16% would have bought another fake item.

61% of respondents reported acquiring the majority of fakes in the UK, mainly at market stalls (66%), online auctions (37%), designer discount outlets (19%), and discount stores (18%).

Most consumers agreed with the following affirmations: “genuine products are usually overpriced”, “I would be deterred from buying fakes if it was a crime”, “the government should do more to tackle the problem of fake products”, and “I would not buy fakes because of the links to organised crime”. Opinions were divided over whether to punish fake buyers, potential harm caused by fakes, and the value fakes provide for money.

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]