About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: ACG Attitudes Survey 2003 - What do consumers really think about fakes?
Author: [Ipsos MORI]
Source:

Anti-Counterfeiting Group (ACG)
http://www.a-cg.org/guest/pdf/Why_you_should_care.pdf

Year: 2003

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting
Focus: Aircraft and Auto Parts, Apparel and Shoes, Beverages, Brands (deceptive counterfeits), Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Consumer Electronics / Electronic Equipment, Food Products, Medicines and Medical Devices, Personal Care Products, Toys, Watches
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To examine consumer attitudes towards the issue of counterfeit goods.
Sample: 929 representative consumers
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

One in four consumers was not aware of the sale of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods for which public awareness is highest were perfumes/fragrances (60%), clothing/footwear (57%) and watches (57%). Respondents were least aware of fake pesticides (5%), food (8%) and pharmaceuticals (13%).

Counterfeit products considered most acceptable by the respondents were: clothing/footwear (with 27% willing to purchase them given acceptable price/quality), followed by watches (15%) and perfumes/fragrances (13%). Consumers proved least willing to buy fake food (3%), pharmaceuticals (1%) and pesticides (1%). 57% would not knowingly purchase any counterfeit good.

Consumer awareness regarding the effects of counterfeiting is generally on the rise: 66% were aware that the government loses millions in VAT/taxes due to counterfeiting; 59% were aware that counterfeits can be dangerous and/or damage legitimate businesses; and 46% knew about the counterfeiting/organised crime link.

Men were more aware of counterfeiting and its effects than women, but they were also more likely to knowingly buy fakes. Opposition to counterfeit goods was found to increase with age: opposition to counterfeit goods was at 41% for the 15-24 age group, at 48% for the 25-39 age group, at 56% for the 45-54 age group, and at 76% for the 60+ age group. Attitudes towards counterfeiting varied also according to location and socio-economic background.

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]