About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: The Good, the Bad and the Confusing: User-Generated Video Creators on Copyright
Author: Patricia Aufderheide [American University] and Peter Jaszi [Washington College of Law]
Source:

AU School of Communication
http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/files/pdf/good_bad_confusing.pdf

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: IP Knowledge
Focus: Copyright
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To find out how creators of content on the plethora of sites that accept online video understand their rights and responsibilities regarding intellectual property.
Sample: 51 undergraduate and graduate college students who upload videos online
Methodology: Online survey, phone/instant messaging interviews

Main Findings

Students incorporating copyrighted material into their own work do so as part of routine creative practice: 58% of respondents admit to using copyrighted material in videos they upload to the Internet. 87% of those incorporating copyrighted content make no attempt to ask permission from rightholders, even though three in four of them believe that it is fair to pay people for use.

Ignorance about copyright is widespread: 54% of makers surveyed report that they do not understand when it is permissible to use copyrighted materials at all. While 76% believe that the fair use doctrine permits them to use copyrighted materials, none of the interviewees was able to describe this doctrine accurately. Regarding their own creations, 74% affirm that owning copyright is important to them. However, just 56% think that they own copyright to their online videos.

Respondents try to palliate their misinformation and underinformation about copyright law by establishing binary oppositions between good and bad behaviour – they consider the use of copyrighted materials legitimate: in private life, for example to fuel their friendship networks (but not in public life); for non-commercial purposes (but not for commercial purposes); if use is “helpful” to rightholders, for example by giving them public exposure, advertising (but not if it “hurts” rightholders); and if credit/recognition is given.

The study’s authors emphasise the “need for better general understanding of the use rights of creators, in order to create a more stable and useful framework within which new creation can flourish. Both media producers and providers of online platforms for user-generated production need to participate in this broadening of understanding of the use rights of creators”.

[Date Added: Dec 1, 2008 ]