About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Cracking Counterfeit
Author: [TNS]
Source:

Pfizer
http://www.pfizer.co.uk/Media/Documents/The%20Cracking%20Counterfeit%20report.pdf

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting
Focus: Medicines and Medical Devices
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To better understand the mindset of men and why they are turning to illicit sources to buy medicines, often without prescription or consulting a healthcare professional.
Sample: 935 men aged 35+ in major UK cities
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

11% of the UK men interviewed admit to purchasing prescription only medicines without a prescription, implying that they are going direct to illicit sources to seek their treatment. 50% of those acquiring prescription only medicines without a prescription do so over the Internet. Acquisition sources other than the Internet are: overseas/on holiday abroad (11%), shops (34%), and pubs/nightclubs (3%). On average, the men interviewed claimed to spend £30.61 per annum on fake medicines. Reasons given for counterfeit medicine buying are: convenience and speed (37%), embarrassment of going to a GP (19%), and cheaper price (20%).

45% of those purchasing prescription medicines without prescription find it easy to get hold of such medicines. 68% of respondents suspect that the ingredients of counterfeit medicines to be very different from authentic medicines. When asked about side effects posed by counterfeits, 25% stated that it might react with other prescription medicines, 16% suggested vomiting, and 8% cited death. Those believing that fake medicines have more side effects than genuine ones cited the following potential side effects from fake medicines: death (16%), vomiting (8%), and reaction with other prescription medicines (1%); 25% did not know. 60% of illicit prescription medicine buyers admit that if there was a possibility their medicine was counterfeit, it would have a great impact on their likelihood to purchase.

[Date Added: Jan 27, 2009 ]