About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: O Consumo de Produtos Piratas no Brasil 2008
Author: [IPSOS]
Source:

Federação do Comércio do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
http://www.fecomercio-rj.org.br/publique/media/Estudo%20Pirataria_AnoIII.pdf

Year: 2009

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Aircraft and Auto Parts, Apparel and Shoes, Consumer Electronics / Electronic Equipment, Fashion Accessories, Film, Music, Personal Care Products, Software, Tobacco Products, Toys, Watches
Country/Territory: Brazil
Objective: To find out who consumes counterfeit products, why they are consumed, and whether consumers are aware of the consequences of counterfeit goods consumption.
Sample: 1.000 households in 70 cities and 9 metropolitan regions
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

In 2008, 47% of consumers bought at least one pirated product (5% more than in 2006 and 2007). 94% indicated that price is the decisive factor when buying counterfeits. The most-often consumed counterfeit goods were: CDs (with 83% of counterfeit buyers having purchased pirated CDs), followed by DVDs (69%), glasses (7%), shoes (7%), watches, clothes, toys and perfumes (all 5%).

Counterfeit buyers and non-counterfeit buyers reported that they were most likely to reject fakes of the following products: electronic devices (41%), perfumes (20%), software (19%), DVDs (19%), glasses (18%), and shoes (17%).

64% of consumers affirmed that the consumption of pirated goods can have negative consequences: 85% believed that counterfeits hurt the manufacturers/artists; 79% felt that counterfeiting hurts legitimate businesses; 77% were aware of tax evasion related to counterfeits; 68% associated counterfeiting with organised crime; 63% affirmed that counterfeiting causes unemployment.

Those not buying fakes gave the following reasons for not doing so: “low quality” (55%), “lack of warranty” (20%), “negative effect on genuine vendors” (8%), “fear that money saved with counterfeit not outweighing possible damage” (6%), and “fear of prosecution for buying an illegal product” (5%).

[Date Added: Sep 15, 2009 ]