About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines

PART III EXAMINER CONSIDERATIONS COMMON TO BOTH THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY AND THE INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINING AUTHORITY

Chapter 9  Exclusions from, and Limitations of, International Search and International Preliminary Examination

Multiple Dependent Claims

Articles 17(2)(b), 34(4)(b); Rule 6.4(a)

9.41  Rule 6.4(a) provides that any dependent claim which refers to more than one other claim (“multiple dependent claim”) shall refer to such claims in the alternative only and multiple dependent claims shall not serve as a basis for any other multiple dependent claim. Where an international application contains multiple dependent claims drafted in a different manner and the national law of the Office acting as International Searching Authority does not allow multiple dependent claims to be drafted in the said different manner, the International Searching Authority may make an indication under Article 17(2)(b). Such an indication, however, should only be made if and to the extent to which a meaningful search is not possible. Such a case is also noted in the written opinion, and it will of course only be possible to establish a written opinion or international preliminary examination report on novelty and inventive step to the extent that the claims have in fact been searched.

9.41A  It should be noted that an independent claim may also contain a reference to another claim (see paragraph 5.19). Where an independent claim contains a reference to more than one other claim and serves as a basis for a multiple dependent claim, the International Searching Authority may also make an indication under Article 17(2)(b) if the national law of its Office does not allow multiple dependent claims to be drafted in this manner. Such an indication, however, should only be made if and to the extent to which a meaningful search is not possible. In such a case, it is also noted in the written opinion.

9.41B  In deciding whether a claim is a multiple dependent claim or not, the examiner should consider not only the form of the claim itself, but also the claims referred to in the said claim. Any dependent claim which refers to either a multiple dependent claim or an independent claim containing a reference to more than one other claim shall be considered as a multiple dependent claim itself, and as such, shall not serve as a basis for any other multiple dependent claim.