About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

PCT Receiving Office Guidelines

Chapter VII: Priority Claims and Priority Documents

Transmittal to the International Bureau of a Priority Document Furnished by the Applicant

179. Where the priority of an earlier national, regional or international application is claimed, a copy of that earlier application, certified by the authority (that is, a national or regional Office with which it was filed or, in the case of an earlier international application, the receiving Office with which that earlier international application was filed) (“the priority document”) must, unless already filed with the receiving Office together with the international application in which the priority claim is made, be submitted by the applicant to the International Bureau or to the receiving Office within the time limit provided for in Rule 17.1(a).

180. Upon receipt of a priority document, the receiving Office indelibly marks the international application number and the date of receipt on the document in the top right corner of the first sheet.

181. The receiving Office checks whether the indications in the request relating to the priority claim correspond to the indications on that document. In the affirmative, the receiving Office promptly transmits the priority document to the International Bureau with a notification (Form PCT/RO/135) of the date of receipt (Section 323(a) and (c)). It does not check whether the priority document has been received within the time limit of 16 months from the priority date provided for in Rule 17.1(a).

182. Where indications given in the request relating to the priority claim and the corresponding indications on the priority document are inconsistent or incomplete, the receiving Office invites (Form PCT/RO/110) the applicant to correct or furnish the indication(s) concerned and draws the applicant’s attention to the time limit under Rule 26bis.1 (paragraphs 167 to 172). It transmits the priority document with a copy of that invitation to the International Bureau. Where indications given in the request are incomplete (for example, the number of the priority application is missing), and the receiving Office possesses sufficient information concerning the missing indications (for example, from the priority document) it may make the indication ex officio before transmitting the priority document to the International Bureau. For notifications concerning that ex officio correction, see paragraph 170.