About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

PCT Receiving Office Guidelines

Chapter VIII: Missing Parts or Erroneously Filed Elements or Parts in the International Application

Replacement Sheet Containing Correction under Rule 26 and Rectification of Obvious Mistakes under Rule 91

217. If the receiving Office receives a sheet in response to an invitation to correct formal defects under Rule 26 and notices a discrepancy between the proposed replacement sheet and the sheet to be replaced, it proceeds as outlined in the following paragraphs.

218. If the discrepancy is in the request, the receiving Office may, after having obtained confirmation from the applicant, consider the proposed replacement sheet as constituting also a request for the rectification of an obvious mistake under Rules 91.1(b)(i) and 91.2. Where the receiving Office authorizes such rectification and that sheet complies with the formal requirements, the receiving Office marks that sheet “RECTIFIED SHEET (RULE 91)”; it notifies the applicant (Form PCT/RO/109) of the authorization of the rectification and sends a copy of that notification to the International Bureau and the International Searching Authority (Section 325(a)). 

219. Where such discrepancy is on a sheet of any part of the international application other than the request, the receiving Office proceeds as outlined in paragraph 208(ii).

220. Where, following the invitation of the receiving Office, the applicant submits a request for rectification of an obvious mistake, and the International Searching Authority authorizes the rectification and sends to the receiving Office a copy of the sheet concerned marked “RECTIFIED SHEET (RULE 91)”, the receiving Office inserts that sheet into the home copy.

221. The procedure outlined in the preceding paragraphs also applies where the applicant submits a replacement sheet containing both a correction of a formal defect under Rule 26 and also a rectification of an obvious mistake, together with a request for rectification of the obvious mistake concerned.