About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

PCT Receiving Office Guidelines

Chapter XVIII: Items to be Transmitted to Another Authority

Transmittal of Demand under Rule 59.3

328. Where a demand under Chapter II of the Treaty is submitted to the receiving Office and only one International Preliminary Examining Authority is competent, the receiving Office proceeds as outlined in Rule 59.3(a) and (f), that is, it marks the date of receipt on the demand and,

(i) it either forwards the demand to the International Bureau, which will in turn transmit it to the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority, or

(ii) it transmits it directly to the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority.

The receiving Office notifies (Form PCT/RO/153) the applicant accordingly and sends a copy of that notification to the International Bureau or to the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority, as the case may be.

329. Where a demand under Chapter II of the Treaty is submitted to the receiving Office and more than one International Preliminary Examining Authority is competent, the receiving Office proceeds as outlined in Rule 59.3(a) and (f), that is, it marks the date of receipt on the demand and,

(i) it either forwards the demand to the International Bureau, which will in turn invite the applicant to indicate the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority, or

(ii) it invites (Form PCT/RO/154) the applicant to indicate, within 15 days from the date of the invitation or before the expiration of the applicable time limit under Rule 54bis.1(a), whichever is later, the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority to which the demand should be transmitted. Where such indication is timely furnished, the receiving Office transmits the demand to that Authority (Form PCT/RO/153). The receiving Office notifies (Form PCT/RO/153) the applicant accordingly and sends a copy of that notification to the International Bureau or to the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority, as the case may be.

330. Any demand so transmitted to the competent Authority will be considered to have been received by the receiving Office on behalf of that Authority on the date marked on it (Rule 59.3(e)).

331. Where the demand is submitted after the expiration of 19 months from the priority date to a receiving Office, and the time limit under Article 22(1), as in force from April 1, 2002 does not apply in respect of all designated Offices, the receiving Office shall promptly notify the applicant accordingly (Section 334). Forms PCT/RO/153 and PCT/RO/154 contain a check-box for that purpose. The applicant should, in such case, also be informed by telephone or facsimile transmission. Since the receiving Office is generally not in a position to determine whether the date of receipt of the demand is after the expiration of the applicable time limit under Rule 54bis.1(a), the applicant’s attention should be drawn to the fact that, should the applicable time limit have already expired, the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority will notify the applicant accordingly at a later date. Forms PCT/RO/153 and PCT/RO/154 also contain a check-box for that purpose.

332. Where the applicant has not, within the time limit referred to in the invitation (Form PCT/RO/154), indicated the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority to which the demand should be transmitted, the demand is considered not to have been submitted and the receiving Office so declares (Form PCT/RO/155).