About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Experts Discuss Traditional Knowledge and the Intellectual Property System

Geneva, November 2, 1999
Press Releases PR/1999/195

In the course of a two-day Roundtable from November 1 and 2, 1999, organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), traditional knowledge practitioners, and representatives of governments, research institutes, industry and academia addressed the role of the intellectual property system in protecting traditional knowledge. Some 150 participants from all regions of the world contributed to the success of this two-day meeting.

Discussions focused on intellectual property aspects of traditional knowledge and, in particular, addressed issues such as the definition, nature, value, ownership, use and protection of traditional knowledge. As yet, there is no agreed definition of traditional knowledge, but it includes traditional medicinal, agricultural and ecological knowledge, as well as traditional music, stories and poems, dance, design, and sculpture. Following an overview of WIPO's past and future activities in the area of intellectual property and traditional knowledge, a panel of experts highlighted the challenges in using existing intellectual property protection systems to protect traditional knowledge. A number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as well as representatives of holders of traditional knowledge underlined the need to develop appropriate protection for traditional knowledge.

Two case studies were presented by government representatives from the Philippines and Peru. These examples drew attention to useful lessons and experiences that had been gained in implementing systems of sui generis protection of traditional knowledge at the national level. A number of WIPO member States expressed their views on the protection of traditional knowledge and, in view of its interdisciplinary nature, underlined the need to coordinate activities in this area with other international organizations.

Participants agreed that WIPO is an appropriate forum to continue to explore a possible legal framework that combines intellectual property with the social, cultural and economic aspirations of holders of traditional knowledge. Such a framework would fully recognize the relevance of intellectual property protection and the contribution that the intellectual property system may make to protecting traditional knowledge.

For further details, please contact Mr. Richard Owens, Director, Global Intellectual Property Issues Division at WIPO:



https://www3.wipo.int/contact/en/area.jsp?area=publicinfo https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/disclaim.html https://www.wipo.int/en/web/privacy-policy/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/accessibility/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/sitemap.html https://www3.wipo.int/newsletters/en/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/podcasts/ https://www.wipo.int/news/en/