Survey on office practices for digital transformation
Collated Results
This survey collects information from Industrial Property Offices (IPOs) on their digital intake, processing, and publication practices.
- Purpose: provide information on IPO practices for consideration by the CWS
- Conducted: March to May 2022
- Survey approved: ninth session of the CWS
Notes
- This data is presented as provided by the respondent. If you have questions about a particular respondent's data, please contact that Office for more information.
- Empty table cells mean that the respondent did not answer that part of the question. Likewise, a respondent with no entry on a particular question means they did not answer that question.
Survey Contents
Click an item to jump to the responses.
- Survey respondents
- 1. In what formats does your Office/Organization ingest applications? Please select all that apply.
- 2. How does your Office/Organization capture markups (insertions, deletions) in amendments, corrections, and rectifications? Please select all that apply.
- 3. Does your Office/Organization provide initial content-based validations to applicants prior to submission to reduce the number of formality non-compliances?
- 4. What does your Office/Organization validate prior to submission? Please select all that apply.
- 5. Does your Office/Organization provide a scrubbing tool to remove unwanted metadata from the documents prior to submission?
- 6. Does your Office/Organization provide a feedback document, additional document or online messages during the filing process detailing potential problems within the submitted application documents based on the above validations?
- 7. What does your Office/Organization consider the authoritative copy of the submission?
- 8. If your Office/Organization converts or plans to convert the submitted document to XML, in which format would you preserve embedded images? Please select all that apply.
- 9. When the submitted document is transformed to XML, in what format does your Office/Organization preserve mathematical equations?
- 10. When the submitted document is transformed to XML, in what format does your Office/Organization preserve chemical formulae?
- 11. When the submitted document is transformed to XML, in what format does your Office/Organization preserve table or tabular data? Please select all that apply.
- 12. Is your Office/Organization moving away from paper-based rules for applicant submissions, such as page count, margins line spacing and focus more on the amount of characters/words in a document or file size?
- 13. If your Office/Organization is not considering moving away from paper-based rules, select the presentation elements your Office/Organization needs to preserve from the submitted application documents. Please select all that apply.
- 14. Select the formats by which your Office/Organization displays or would display an application for examination or administration purposes. Select all that apply.
- 15. Select the formats which your Office/Organization uses or would use to publish documents submitted by applicants.
- 16. Specify the content management system your Office/Organization uses to store and manage documents. Please provide either names of commercial products or brief description of custom-built systems.
- 17. In what formats do you publish your Official Gazette? Select all that apply.
- 18. If you still publish in a physical format, are you considering discontinuing physical publication within the next five years?
- 19. If you still publish in an electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF), are you considering discontinuing this format in favor of a purely digital format within the next five years?
Survey respondents
Respondent by ST.3 code | Office or Organization Name (if provided) |
---|---|
AF Afghanistan | |
AU Australia |
IP Australia |
AZ Azerbaijan |
Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
BH Bahrain |
Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
BR Brazil |
Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) | |
CA Canada |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
CL Chile |
National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
CN China |
CNIPA |
DK Denmark |
dkpto |
DZ Algeria |
Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) |
DZ Algeria |
National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) |
EE Estonia |
The Estonian Patent Office |
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) |
EUIPO |
EP European Patent Office (EPO) |
EPO |
ES Spain |
Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
FI Finland |
Finnish patent and registration office |
HK Hong Kong, China |
Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
HR Croatia |
State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
HU Hungary |
HIPO |
IE Ireland |
Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
IL Israel |
Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
IT Italy |
Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
JO Jordan |
Department of the national library |
JP Japan |
Japan Patent Office |
KE Kenya |
Kenya Industrial Property Institute |
KR Republic of Korea |
Korean Intellectual Property Office |
LT Lithuania |
The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
MD Republic of Moldova |
State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
MX Mexico |
Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
NZ New Zealand |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
PH Philippines |
Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
RU Russian Federation |
Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
SA Saudi Arabia |
Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
SE Sweden |
Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
SK Slovakia |
Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
SM San Marino |
Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
TD Chad |
Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
UA Ukraine |
State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" |
UA Ukraine |
UKRPATENT |
US United States of America |
United States Patent and Trademark Office |
UY Uruguay |
National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
1. In what formats does your Office/Organization ingest applications? Please select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
|
. |
|
AU Australia IP Australia |
XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Fax |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Other (specify) |
XML ST.26 for genetic sequences listings. |
|
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Other (specify) |
see comment |
Via EUIPN Software Package Front Office |
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Fax Other (specify) |
TIFF, PNG, JPEG (Image formats of Trademarks and Industrial Designs) |
We are live with Madrid-ST.96, Hague-ST.96, PCT-ST.36-ish. Madrid-eFiling, PCT ISA (PCT Safe) PCT PatentScope, and Our ECOM filings and exchanges are being modernized. |
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Paper Other (specify) |
Web form |
The office receives applications via web form, where applicants submit the bibliographic data and a PDF file is generated for the application. |
CN China CNIPA |
XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) |
Paper |
||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Other (specify) |
e-filing (input xml) |
|
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Other (specify) |
The office tool for submitting applications is the "eFiling" online service (available at
https://euipo.europa
|
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Common Application Format (CAF) – DOCX template Paper Fax |
XML is ingested only in WIPO ST36 and not 66 or 86. DOCX is limited to pilot users only filing the request for a new EP application |
|
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
XML in WIPO ST.96 Paper Other (specify) |
See comments |
Where images of trademarks need to be attached, GIF, BMP, PNG, TIF, TIFF, JPG and JPEG formats are supported. In the case of sequence listings, a searchable format such as TXT is currently required. Under the new WIPO Standard ST.26, XML attachments will be permitted. |
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Fax Other (specify) |
in XML |
|
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
XML in WIPO ST.96 Paper Other (specify) |
For applications submitted through e-filing, information is ingested through web form and then converted to XML for processing in the internal electronic processing system of our department i.e. Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China. Graphics in BMP, GIF, JPEG, JPG, PNG or TIF format; audio files in MP3, WAV, MIDI or WMA format; and video files in MP4, MPEG, MPG or WMV format are all accepted in original format. Other supporting attachments should be in PDF format. |
|
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Fax |
The HIPO will accept sequence listing documents in .xml format according to ST.26 from 01.07.2022 2. We have a national regulation "451/2016. (XII. 19.) Korm. rendelet" which governs the minimum accepted electronic document formats, so the above list is considered exemplary. |
|
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Other (specify) |
.txt, jpg |
|
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Paper |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Paper Other (specify) |
html form |
|
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Paper Fax Other (specify) |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Common Application Format (CAF) – DOCX template Paper |
N/A |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
XML in WIPO ST.96 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper |
KIPO ingests applications in DOCX format only when they include provisional specifications. |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Paper |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Fax Other (specify) |
custom XML format for online applications |
|
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Paper Other (specify) |
Through online services and the Hague bulletin in XML format |
|
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Other (specify) |
Online forms and API (SOAP) |
Supporting documents such as: - patent specification or plant variety technical questionnaire are ingested as PDF - trade mark and design images in limited image formats - national geographical indications definition as geospatial file |
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
XML in WIPO ST.96 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Common Application Format (CAF) – DOCX template Paper Fax Other (specify) |
Rich Text Format (RTF) |
|
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Paper |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
XML in WIPO ST.96 Paper Fax |
XML in WIPO ST.96 only for trademarks (MECASE) |
|
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper Other (specify) |
XML from office electronic form, EPO online filing |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
Paper |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Paper |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" |
XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Common Application Format (CAF) – DOCX template Paper Fax Other (specify) |
electronic filling system, e-mail, SFTP-service |
SFTP-service like PCT-EDI |
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
XML in WIPO ST.96 |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Microsoft Word DOCX (free form, no template) Paper |
Majority is in PDFs however Starting January 1, 2023, a surcharge up to $400 will apply when filing a new nonprovisional utility applications under 111(a) and applies to the specification, claims, and abstract when filed in PDF format. |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Other (specify) |
Applications are submitted online via the electronic form in our filing system |
2. How does your Office/Organization capture markups (insertions, deletions) in amendments, corrections, and rectifications? Please select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions |
. |
|
AU Australia IP Australia |
Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Applicant submits new clean application documents, and Office uses a DOCX comparison tool to compare and markup changes, then a final copy is generated by the tool |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments XML in WIPO ST.96 |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments XML in WIPO ST.96 Other (specify) |
We perform XML diffs to derive the changed structured text/data.. Otherwise if no structured text then document is visually inspected. Our eCommerce app captures/flags changes. |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
When pages of the submitted documents are replaced, the applicant sends a letter indicating the replacement. |
|
CN China CNIPA |
Applicant submits new clean application documents, and Office uses a DOCX comparison tool to compare and markup changes, then a final copy is generated by the tool XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments Other (specify) |
After filing the application, applicants can provide amended information using PDF forms provided by the EUIPO. They can also send corrections with a communication that they can submit via Post or via the eCommunication system provided by the EUIPO website. Generally the Office is not accepting amendments except for the changes listed at the EUIPO Recordals page (
https://euipo.europa
|
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments Other (specify) |
Some applicants submit amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions |
|
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments Other (specify) |
In some cases for patents, hard copies or non-editable electronic copies with markups showing amendments with track changes are submitted. |
|
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
We support formats: PDF, DOC, DOCX |
|
HU Hungary HIPO |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
We do not have specific rules for corrections etc. the sole requirement is to send a clean copy, otherwise further copies showing the modifications are welcome. |
|
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
we have no markups |
|
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 Other (specify) |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions |
N/A |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Other (specify) |
Applicants submit amendments with the "corrections" or "deletions" arranged in sections according to each identification number and our Office generates a final copy by using a comparison tool. |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments XML in WIPO ST.96 |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
there are some tools that help examiners to identify the changes in products and services lists |
|
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments Other (specify) |
Through an electronic platform developed by the Office, where users provide information on amendments, corrections or rectifications; applicants sign the application with an electronic signature produced in the country |
|
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions Other (specify) |
online forms |
Track changes amendments only relate to patent specifications, other amendments and corrections are made via online forms where amendments to the application can be proposed which are usually shown as before and after history. |
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments XML in WIPO ST.96 XML in WIPO ST.36 / 66 / 86 |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments Applicant submits new clean application documents, and Office uses a DOCX comparison tool to compare and markup changes, then a final copy is generated by the tool |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments XML in WIPO ST.96 |
XML in WIPO ST.96 only for trademarks (MECASE) |
|
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Other (specify) |
Applicant submits new clean application documents, and Office uses a DOCX comparison tool to compare and markup changes. The new clean specifications filed by the applicant are the latest (final) version |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Applicant submits amendments with track changes to show insertions and deletions Applicant submits amendments with underlines for insertions, and strikethroughs for deletions |
Underlines are used to indicate insertions and strikethroughs are used to markup text deletions. In DOCX, the USPTO plans to support both track changes as well as text formatting (stylistic underlines & strikethroughs). The full text of any replacement paragraph with markings to show all the changes relative to the previous version of the paragraph. The text of any added subject matter must be shown by underlining the added text. The text of any deleted matter must be shown by strike-through except that double brackets placed before and after the deleted characters may be used to show deletion of five or fewer consecutive characters. The text of any deleted subject matter must be shown by being placed within double brackets if strike-through cannot be easily perceived. |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Applicant submits clean copy of the amendments |
3. Does your Office/Organization provide initial content-based validations to applicants prior to submission to reduce the number of formality non-compliances?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Comments |
---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Yes |
|
AU Australia IP Australia |
Yes |
Online Services undertakes address validation (using address validation software), priority claim validation, attachment validation (size, format, file names etc) and mandatory specification requirements (to ensure alignment with Minimum Filing Requirements). IP Australia does not validate the content within any attachments/uploads. IP Australia also provide internal validation warning to admin users to alert to out of time priority claims. |
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Yes |
|
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Yes |
|
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Yes |
|
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Yes |
|
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Yes |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
No |
|
CN China CNIPA |
Yes |
|
DK Denmark dkpto |
No |
|
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) |
Yes |
|
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | ||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
No |
|
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Yes |
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
No |
Annex F compliance check |
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
No |
No validation of content is carried out, except to ensure that the minimum required documentation (e.g., for patents, something needs to be included by way of a description) is filed. At present, certain elements of applications are validated in terms of consistency of provided dates and attached documents. Moreover, use of the WIPO ST.26 Desktop Tool is being promoted in order to ensure that sequence listings received are in accordance with the standard. |
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Yes |
|
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Yes |
|
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
No |
|
HU Hungary HIPO |
No |
|
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
No |
|
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
No |
|
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Yes |
|
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
No |
|
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Yes |
|
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
No |
N/A |
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Yes |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Yes |
|
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
No |
|
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Yes |
Validation of mandatory fields, payment information and attachments in accordance with management policies. |
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Yes |
But not within the content of a patent specification |
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
No |
|
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Yes |
|
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Yes |
|
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Yes |
|
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
No |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
No |
|
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Yes |
A report duly signed by both parties is produced and a copy is given to the applicant. |
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | ||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Yes |
|
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Yes |
Yes, currently DOCX filings provides content-based validations for specification, claims and abstract. This feature is does not apply to PDFs. |
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Yes |
4. What does your Office/Organization validate prior to submission? Please select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Missing required application parts |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
Missing required application parts |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Missing required application parts |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Missing required application parts |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies |
||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies Other (specify) |
Future initiative to improve upon Patents filings. Plus we also validate addresses and dates, and we control the data which may be amended – based on state of the IP application. |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Other (specify) |
Not applicable |
|
CN China CNIPA |
Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
Missing required application parts |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Missing required application parts |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies Other (specify) |
- Checking good and services against the Harmonized list. - Syntactical checks against the application. - Correctness of Applicant and Representative data, incl. duplicates to avoid deficiencies. |
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Missing required application parts |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Missing required application parts |
Only the minimum legal requirements are examined prior to granting of a filing date. |
|
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Missing required application parts Other (specify) |
TM goods and services (NICE classifications) |
|
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Missing required application parts Other (specify) |
Please refer to the "Validation rules for web-forms" under the heading "Related links" of our department's e-filing system at
https://efiling.ipd.
|
|
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Missing required application parts |
Only via e-filing web application |
|
HU Hungary HIPO |
Other (specify) |
The HIPO does not offer a validation tool for validation prior to the actual submission. However, incoming e-filings are validated before formal acceptance in respect of their file type and readablity. |
|
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Other (specify) |
The online e-filing system does not allow an application to be given a provisional application number unless the minimum legislative filing requirements have been met. |
|
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Missing required application parts |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Missing required application parts |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Missing required application parts |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Missing required application parts Improper claim dependencies |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies |
N/A This is applicable |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Missing required application parts |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Missing required application parts |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Other (specify) |
Validation of mandatory fields, payment information and attachments in accordance with management policies. |
|
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Missing required application parts Other (specify) |
address for service, fees |
e.g. you can't submit a trade mark application for an image mark without supplying a valid image. |
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Missing required application parts |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Missing required application parts |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Missing required application parts |
in an electronic forms and EPO online filing |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | |||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Missing required application parts |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers Improper claim dependencies |
A list of warnings and errors can be found at
https://www.uspto.go
|
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Missing required application parts Informalities such as typographical errors or missing claim numbers |
5. Does your Office/Organization provide a scrubbing tool to remove unwanted metadata from the documents prior to submission?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Comments | If yes, which types of metadata are removed? |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Yes |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
No |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
No |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
No |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
No |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
No |
||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
No |
Our ITM project is introducing capabilities to auto-populate form templates, plus also to auto-scan OCR uploaded documents. |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
No |
||
CN China CNIPA |
No |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
No |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) |
No |
||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
No |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
No |
||
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
No |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
No |
||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
No |
||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
No |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
No |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
No |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
No |
||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
No |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
No |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
No |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
No |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
No |
N/A This does not apply |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
No |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
No |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
No |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
No |
||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
No |
||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
No |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
No |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
No |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
No |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
No |
||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
No |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
No |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Yes |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Yes |
Yes. Metadata is generally removed by applicants prior to submission. However, if metadata is found during the validation process, it is automatically removed prior to submission. Examples of metadata include author, company, last modified by, bookmarks, etc. The only information that is preserved is the size, page count, and word count. |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
No |
6. Does your Office/Organization provide a feedback document, additional document or online messages during the filing process detailing potential problems within the submitted application documents based on the above validations?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Comments |
---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Yes |
|
AU Australia IP Australia |
Yes |
Users are provided with prompts in the online user interface of IP Australia's Online Services tool. These are designed to provide assistance and general guiding information to help completion of the required information to submit the application. |
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Yes |
|
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Yes |
|
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
No |
|
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Yes |
|
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Yes |
We provide a formatted version of their application, and messages where applicable. |
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Yes |
The web form validates for completeness and correlations of mandatory data based on the combination of certain fields. |
CN China CNIPA |
Yes |
|
DK Denmark dkpto |
No |
We provide a document for the application documents |
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) |
No |
|
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | ||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Yes |
|
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Yes |
The online procedure is guided. Suggestions, controlled vocabularies, explanation and help messages are available in any moment and for all the information requested to the applicant. Search report with conflicting trademarks across the EU are also provided (currently based on TMview data). A receipt is automatically provided at the end of the application process. It certifies the successful submission of the application. |
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Yes |
EPO provides online messages during the filing process, e.g. Annex F compliance of attached documents; guidance on bibliographical information to be provided |
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Yes |
Our online applications contain various types of tooltips. |
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Yes |
Automatic pre-validation of NICE classes. |
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Yes |
|
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Yes |
Only via e-filing web application |
HU Hungary HIPO |
Yes |
|
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
No |
The online e-fling system provides information boxes explaining each step of the application process. Furthermore an error message will appear if information has been omitted or entered incorrectly. |
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) | ||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
No |
|
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Yes |
|
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Yes |
|
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Yes No |
N/A |
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Yes |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Yes |
|
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Yes |
|
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Yes |
Validation of mandatory attachments in accordance with management policies. User guides and pop-up windows with examples and additional information on the application creation and update process. |
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Yes |
|
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Yes |
The TM online filing system warns applicant about potential existence of similar mark/s in the PH and ASEAN databases, although the applicant may choose to proceed anyway. The system also warns of potential problem in the chosen Nice Class term, but the applicant may likewise choose to proceed anyway. |
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Yes |
|
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Yes |
|
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
No |
|
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
No |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
No |
|
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Yes |
|
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | ||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Yes |
|
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Yes |
Yes, a feedback document is generated pre-submission where warnings and errors are pinpointed in a copy of the uploaded document in real time. The warnings and errors are also displayed to the user. |
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
No |
7. What does your Office/Organization consider the authoritative copy of the submission?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Originally submitted application documents Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
XML document converted from the originally submitted document Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Other (specify) |
For our Office the originally submitted application takes the form of an XML (there is no conversion to an XML) |
|
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
CN China CNIPA |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Other (specify) |
The output of the online application procedure is electronically stored in the internal repository of the EUIPO. The website generates a PDF and an XML version documents that contain the submitted data from the online application. This output is considered the authoritative copy of the submission. The PDF document is available online in "eSearch" application for the public. |
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Originally submitted application documents Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Originally submitted application documents Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) | |||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Originally submitted application documents XML document converted from the originally submitted document Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Originally submitted application documents |
N/A |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Other (specify) |
Online - originally submitted application documents(XML documents); Paper-based - XML documents digitalized from originally submitted documents |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania | |||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Originally submitted application documents Cleaned up version of the originally submitted application documents after they have gone through initial content validations and metadata scrubbing |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Originally submitted application documents Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) Other (specify) |
Through an electronic platform developed by the Office, where users provide information requested by the platform itself based on the legal framework; users sign the application or update with an electronic signature produced in the country. |
|
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Originally submitted application documents XML document converted from the originally submitted document Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Other (specify) |
printed or scanned certified application documents or documents signed with electronic signature |
|
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Originally submitted application documents Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted application documents Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Cleaned up version of the originally submitted application documents after they have gone through initial content validations and metadata scrubbing |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Originally submitted application documents |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Originally submitted application documents Document converted from originally submitted document to another format used within your Office/Organization (e.g. PDF, TIFF) Other (specify) |
For DOCX filings, the DOCX is considered the authoritative copy.
https://www.federalr
|
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Originally submitted application documents |
8. If your Office/Organization converts or plans to convert the submitted document to XML, in which format would you preserve embedded images? Please select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Original format if possible |
||
AU Australia IP Australia | |||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan | |||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Original format if possible JPEG Other (specify) |
|
|
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Other (specify) |
unknown a this moment |
|
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) | |||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Original format if possible TIFF PNG JPEG |
For office use, convert from TIFF or JPEG if required. |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile | |||
CN China CNIPA |
PNG JPEG |
||
DK Denmark dkpto | |||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Original format if possible |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
N/A |
||
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
TIFF |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) | |||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office | |||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Original format if possible |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Original format if possible TIFF |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
The HIPO plans to convert submitted documents to XML in the future, however no details could be disclosed at this point. |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland | |||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Original format if possible |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright | |||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
TIFF JPEG |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE | |||
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Original format if possible TIFF JPEG |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
JPEG Other (specify) |
Trademarks can be submitted in other formats, such as MP3 AND MP4 |
|
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) | |||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | |||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Original format if possible |
||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
PNG Other (specify) |
|
|
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Original format if possible TIFF JPEG Other (specify) |
RTF, DOC |
|
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Original format if possible TIFF PNG JPEG |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
We are not considering it for the moment. |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic | |||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | |||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) | |||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" |
JPEG |
||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Original format if possible |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
SVG |
Images are currently converted to SVG for DOCX filings. |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
9. When the submitted document is transformed to XML, in what format does your Office/Organization preserve mathematical equations?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) |
---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Originally submitted format |
|
AU Australia IP Australia | ||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan | ||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
|
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Other (specify) |
unknown a this moment |
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) | ||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile | ||
CN China CNIPA |
Converted to an image format |
|
DK Denmark dkpto | ||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | ||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | ||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office | ||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Other (specify) |
N/A |
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Converted to an image format MathML |
|
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) | ||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office | ||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Originally submitted format |
|
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Converted to an image format |
|
HU Hungary HIPO |
Other (specify) |
The HIPO plans to convert submitted documents to XML in the future, however no details could be disclosed at this point. |
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland | ||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Originally submitted format |
|
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright | ||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
|
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
|
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE | ||
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Converted to an image format |
|
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) | ||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | ||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand | ||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Originally submitted format |
|
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Converted to an image format MathML |
|
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property | ||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office | ||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic | ||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | ||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) | ||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | ||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Originally submitted format |
|
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
MathML Other (specify) |
Mathematical equations are generally converted to MathML for DOCX filings |
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
10. When the submitted document is transformed to XML, in what format does your Office/Organization preserve chemical formulae?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Originally submitted format |
||
AU Australia IP Australia | |||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan | |||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Other (specify) |
unknown a this moment |
|
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) | |||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format |
Future plans to be determined in regards to Math and Chemical formula. |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile | |||
CN China CNIPA |
Converted to an image format |
||
DK Denmark dkpto | |||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office | |||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
N/A |
||
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Converted to an image format |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) | |||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office | |||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Originally submitted format |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Converted to an image format |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
The HIPO plans to convert submitted documents to XML in the future, however no details could be disclosed at this point. |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland | |||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Originally submitted format |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright | |||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE | |||
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Converted to an image format |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) | |||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | |||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand | |||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Originally submitted format |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office | |||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic | |||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | |||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) | |||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Originally submitted format |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Converted to an image format Other (specify) |
Chemical formulae are preserved as images for DOCX filings. |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
11. When the submitted document is transformed to XML, in what format does your Office/Organization preserve table or tabular data? Please select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Originally submitted format |
||
AU Australia IP Australia | |||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan | |||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Other (specify) |
unknown a this moment |
|
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) | |||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format |
Future plans for table format to be determined |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile | |||
CN China CNIPA |
Converted to an image format |
||
DK Denmark dkpto | |||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office | |||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
N/A |
||
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Converted to an image format |
Depending on the complexity of the table we convert it to XML or preserve it in image format |
|
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) | |||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office | |||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Originally submitted format |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Converted to an image format |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
The HIPO plans to convert submitted documents to XML in the future, however no details could be disclosed at this point. |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland | |||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Originally submitted format |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright | |||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Converted to an image format Converted to a structured data format |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE | |||
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Converted to an image format |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) | |||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | |||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand | |||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Originally submitted format |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Originally submitted format Converted to an image format |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office | |||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic | |||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | |||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) | |||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Originally submitted format |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Other (specify) |
USPTO Internal Version 7.1 (WIPO ST.96 V2_1) contains elements for TableHeader, TableHeaderCell, etc. |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
12. Is your Office/Organization moving away from paper-based rules for applicant submissions, such as page count, margins line spacing and focus more on the amount of characters/words in a document or file size?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
We are considering it |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
We are not considering it |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
We are considering it |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP | |||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
We are considering it |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
We are not considering it |
Our implementing regulations still foresee paperbased conditions for translations |
|
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
We are considering it Other (specify) |
We are trying to reduce amount of paper, and paper formatting rules .Though at same time, CIPO's policy is that we need to accommodate filings in paper. Patents examiners do wish for us to preserve the text spacings for ease of deriving context against the electronic image of the document |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Other (specify) |
New legislation makes provision for fees for excess pages. |
The new legislation makes provisions for fees for excess pages in the case of patents, utility models and designs, so it is necessary to establish line spacing and margins |
CN China CNIPA |
We are not considering it |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
We are in the process of implementing it |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) |
We have already implemented it |
||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
We are considering it |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
We have already implemented it |
The office has moved away from paper submission and accepts online submissions |
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
We are considering it |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
We are not considering it |
||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
We are considering it |
Trademarks and designs focus more on non paper based rules. |
|
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
We have already implemented it |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
We are considering it |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
We are not considering it |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
We are considering it |
||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Other (specify) |
we are never limit the applicant submission |
|
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
We are not considering it |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
We are not considering it |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
We have already implemented it |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
We are not considering it |
NOT SOON |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
We have already implemented it |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
We have already implemented it |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
We are not considering it |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | |||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
We are considering it |
only relevant for patent specifications |
|
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
We are considering it |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
We are not considering it |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
We are considering it |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
We are not considering it |
We are not considering it for the moment. |
|
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
We are not considering it |
||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
We are considering it |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
We are considering it |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
We have already implemented it |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
We are considering it Other (specify) |
These kinds of changes will also require legal changes to current rules guiding paper submissions.. |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
We have already implemented it |
13. If your Office/Organization is not considering moving away from paper-based rules, select the presentation elements your Office/Organization needs to preserve from the submitted application documents. Please select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Page count |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan | |||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Page count |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial | |||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Page count Line spacing Other (specify) |
number of characters on a line |
|
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
Original text spacing is important to patent examiners to inspect context. |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile | |||
CN China CNIPA |
Page count |
||
DK Denmark dkpto | |||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office | |||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
N/A |
||
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO | |||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors Other (specify) |
See comment |
At present, our regulations cover all of the above elements, in addition to other formatting requirements, such as splitting the application into sections, or numbering claims and lines. |
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office | |||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China | |||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia | |||
HU Hungary HIPO |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland | |||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Other (specify) |
we are never limit the applicant submission |
|
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Page count Page dimensions |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office | |||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office | |||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania | |||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | |||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand | |||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines | |||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Other (specify) |
we plan to moving away from paper-based rules |
|
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | |||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Page count Page dimensions Margins Line spacing Text and background colors |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Margins |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office | |||
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
14. Select the formats by which your Office/Organization displays or would display an application for examination or administration purposes. Select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML It can vary depending on the input format |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Rendered XML It can vary depending on the input format Other (specify) |
|
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
All documents are handled in PDF format. |
|
CN China CNIPA |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization It can vary depending on the input format |
||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Other (specify) |
PDF/docx |
|
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Other (specify) Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
Paper format |
N/A |
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Other (specify) |
All applications are being handled in appropriate software regardless the submission form |
|
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application It can vary depending on the input format |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization It can vary depending on the input format |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
converted into DOCX |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Rendered XML |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Rendered XML Other (specify) |
Current process is that all electronic filings are converted to TIFF |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
15. Select the formats which your Office/Organization uses or would use to publish documents submitted by applicants.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML More than one format |
||
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Rendered XML |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Other (specify) |
TM applications are published in the register through selected fields via API |
We are considering publishing received PDF documents (originally submitted) |
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization Other (specify) |
X Other (specify) GIF plus download in PDF for Patents. For Trademarks - PDF with embedded PNG – for images |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
CN China CNIPA |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
pdf format mainly |
|
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
More than one format |
||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML |
Documents are mainly published in PDF format. You can also download content in XML format via the Opendata portal |
|
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization Other (specify) |
TXT format |
|
HU Hungary HIPO |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Other (specify) |
The actual published A1, B1 etc. documents are published in pdf format. |
|
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Other (specify) |
PDF format |
|
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application More than one format |
||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Other (specify) |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
N/A The office only publishes bibliographic data of the applications. |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
More than one format |
Our Office uses PDF and XML formats to publish documents submitted by applicants. |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML |
||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
We are considering rendered XML |
|
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization Rendered XML More than one format |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application Converted format used by our Office/Organization |
converted into PDF |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
More than one format |
XML (WIPO ST.36), TIF image (WIPO ST.33) |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Originally submitted format using an appropriate software application |
16. Specify the content management system your Office/Organization uses to store and manage documents. Please provide either names of commercial products or brief description of custom-built systems.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response |
---|---|
AF Afghanistan | |
AU Australia IP Australia |
BRIK (corporate electronic record management system); Microsoft Sharepoint; AVEPoint for Plant Breeder Rights. Objective for Patents Documents, about to migrate to secure cloud storage (PCT imminent, National about year away). Custom built: IP rights examination platforms transient data store using some off-shelf services. |
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan | |
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Bahrain IP office is using GCC patent system for (patents), WIPO Ipas for (Trademarks and Industrial Designs). |
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial | |
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
We store documents in Amazon Webservices and connected applications retrieve them via a custom-built system (document hub). |
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Currently a mix of IBM CM8 content engine for Patent, and OpenText plus an in-house developed file system for other business/IP subject matter. Our plan is to move all of our IP content to IBM's FileNet content mgt system. |
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
We use the WIPO Industrial Property Administration System (IPAS) and the electronic document management system (EDMS). |
CN China CNIPA |
ORALCE |
DK Denmark dkpto |
update - custom-built system easyflow - commercial product with costom-built services |
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
We currently have paper dossiers, but a system is currently being developed. |
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Our office stores the documents in a custom-built J2EE system based on Filenet Integrated Management System (IMS). This legacy system is planned to be modernized as a cloud-native application with appropriate technologies (such as MongoDB), in the context of the EUIPO Strategic Plan 2025 (SP2025). |
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
EPO do not use any commercial doc management system for our patent applications. The main repository system is PHOENIX. Other systems are MOSES (Multimedia Object StoragE Service) and KIME (Knowledge and Information Management Environment) storing content and documents. MOSES uses S3/Scality technology as storage system. |
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
SPTO uses Universal Content Management (UCM) for document management. |
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Alfresco, EPO-Phoenix |
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Our department uses a JavaScript-based custom-built system which is supported by IBM FileNet Content Manager. |
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
We use in-house developed front-end and back-end apps. Intranet web based back-end applications are used for administrators/examiners. Back-end applications communicate with the front-end module using web services for data exchange, synchronization and archiving in the registers (databases). The back office system processes and archives received requests, unpacks digitally signed XML files, converts DOC(X) attachments to PDF. Data is entered into Registers (PostgreSQL database) for archiving purposes. |
HU Hungary HIPO |
We use the ELO system for content management. |
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Documentation is managed through a custom built module in Ptolemy. Ptolemy is an in-house custom built programme which acts as a database for documentation and allows for the management of subsequent documentation associated with a particular IP right throughout its life cycle. |
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
OpenText™ Documentum™ offers a broad set of capabilities to manage and extract value from content of all kinds across the enterprise. Its industry-leading enterprise content services allows organizations to establish control of their critical information with a single source of the truth, simplifying access to the most recent, approved business content. Documentum case management features bind content together with process and automation to assemble complete case files with minimal effort to streamline important business processes for OpenText™ Documentum™ offers a broad set of capabilities to manage and extract value from content of all kinds across the enterprise. Its industry-leading enterprise content services allows organizations to establish control of their critical information with a single source of the truth, simplifying access to the most recent, approved business content. Documentum case management features bind content together with process and automation to assemble complete case files with minimal effort to streamline important business processes for greater efficiency, consistent quality, and faster cycle times. By keeping content secure and well-protected for future use, users can quickly address information requests and respond to regulatory inquiries, while ensuring that employees do not access unapproved or superseded information. |
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
ACROBAT READER |
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
we archive the documents with the metadata on our archuving system (JUST) |
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Japan Patent Office uses a custom-built systems which store and manage documents depending on whether the submitted documents are in XML format or SGML format. |
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
The office uses the WIPO Industrial Property Administration System (IPAS) and WIPO scan. |
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
FileNet P8 Image Manager" to manage submitted images and attached files; and "BizStore Exus" to manage XML documents of specifications. |
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
A recently developed patent administration system (back office) is currently in place to process, store, compile documents of national patent applications and patents, European patents and supplementary protection applications and certificates, to edit the data and to publish it in the SPB online databases and in the Official Gazette accordingly. The system includes the administration of all possible processes from the filing of the application to the expiry of the patent or supplementary protection certificate. |
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
We do not have an content management system to store and manage documents. |
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Oracle Universal Content Management 10g (UCM). |
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
OpenText Documentum managed via Coexya Ptolemy |
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Nuxeo (WIPO-IPAS) |
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
1. Automated Information System of Electronic Document Management for the Examination of Inventions 2. Electronic Library for PCT Applications 3. Automated Database 4. Document Management System supporting the conversion of documents into digital forms |
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
We have an electronic system |
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Patent: Phoenix, W3D3 and own built system for EP-validations (Vale). Trademark and Design: Own build system (eDVArd), and implementering EUIPO Back Office system. |
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Commercial product Fabasoft eGov-Suite, customized for SK IPO needs by contractor Asseco Central Europe, a.s. The system includes CMS and DMS. |
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | |
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) | |
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
gdfy |
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
USPTO uses internally developed custom built systems to store and manage documents. |
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Industrial Property Administration System (IPAS) - Electronic document management system (EDMS) |
17. In what formats do you publish your Official Gazette? Select all that apply.
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Other (specify) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Physical format (paper) |
||
AU Australia IP Australia |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) Other (specify) |
Patent Journals are available in XML format. |
|
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Physical format (paper) Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) |
Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
CN China CNIPA |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
DK Denmark dkpto |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | |||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | |||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
IP Rights are published in the EUTM Bulletin (
https://euipo.europa
|
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
We publish the official gazette – the European Patent Bulletin – in PDF format. The underlying ST.36 data are also made available to the public (EBD files). |
|
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) Other (specify) |
XML |
Prior authentication is required to download the bulletin in HTML and XML format |
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
HU Hungary HIPO |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Physical format (paper) Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) |
Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
You can download in XML and PDF formats |
|
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
JP Japan Japan Patent Office |
Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) Other (specify) |
XML format |
|
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Physical format (paper) Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
N/A |
|
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
Physical format (paper) Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand |
Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Other (specify) |
XML |
The PDF is generated from XML and it is fully searchable PDF |
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Physical format (paper) Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
||
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | |||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Physical format (paper) |
||
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) Purely digital format (e.g. HTML pages) |
PDF for Trademark Official Gazette & HTML for Patent Official Gazette |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF) |
18. If you still publish in a physical format, are you considering discontinuing physical publication within the next five years?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Comments |
---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Yes |
|
AU Australia IP Australia |
No |
|
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Yes |
|
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
Yes |
|
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial | ||
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) | ||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
N/A |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
No |
The official bulletin is online. |
CN China CNIPA | ||
DK Denmark dkpto | ||
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | ||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | ||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office | ||
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
N/A. We no longer publish in physical format |
|
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO | ||
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) | ||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office | ||
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China | ||
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia | ||
HU Hungary HIPO | ||
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Yes |
|
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) | ||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
No |
We do not publish in physical format |
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
Yes |
|
JP Japan Japan Patent Office | ||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Yes |
N/A |
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office | ||
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania | ||
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
No |
de clarificat |
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | ||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand | ||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines | ||
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
Yes |
We are not publishing in a physical format |
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
not publishing in a physical format |
|
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
Yes |
We already publish in electronical format and not in physical format, see question 17. |
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic | ||
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi | ||
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Yes |
|
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | ||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Yes |
|
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Yes |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
19. If you still publish in an electronic format with paper-based layout (e.g. PDF), are you considering discontinuing this format in favor of a purely digital format within the next five years?
Respondent by ST.3 code | Response | Comments |
---|---|---|
AF Afghanistan |
Yes |
|
AU Australia IP Australia |
No |
|
AZ Azerbaijan Intellectual Property Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan |
Yes |
|
BH Bahrain Directorate of Foreign Trade & IP |
No |
|
BR Brazil Instituto nacional da Propriedade Industrial |
Yes |
|
BX Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) | ||
CA Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office |
No |
|
CL Chile National Industrial Property Institute - INAPI Chile |
No |
|
CN China CNIPA |
No |
|
DK Denmark dkpto |
No |
|
DZ Algeria Algerian National Industrial Property Institute (INAPI) | ||
DZ Algeria National Copyright and Related Rights Office (ONDA) | ||
EE Estonia The Estonian Patent Office |
No |
|
EM European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) EUIPO |
Yes |
The EUIPO is looking into converting its currently paper-based layout (PDF) to an online searchable format. |
EP European Patent Office (EPO) EPO |
Yes |
We are in the process of revisiting the production workflow. But the PDF version is rendered from the existing structured ST. 36 data so we can easily keep it. |
ES Spain Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO) | ||
FI Finland Finnish patent and registration office |
Yes |
Within the next five months. |
HK Hong Kong, China Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong, China |
No |
|
HR Croatia State Intelectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia |
Yes |
|
HU Hungary HIPO |
No |
|
IE Ireland Intellectual Property Office of Ireland |
Yes |
|
IL Israel Israel Patent Office (ILPO) | ||
IT Italy Ministry of Culture - Directorate General for libraries and copyright |
No |
|
JO Jordan Department of the national library |
No |
|
JP Japan Japan Patent Office | ||
KE Kenya KENYA INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE |
Yes |
N/A It is possible to discontinue once the WIPO publish module is installed. |
KR Republic of Korea Korean Intellectual Property Office |
No |
|
LT Lithuania The State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania |
No |
|
MD Republic of Moldova State Agency on Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova(AGEPI) |
No |
|
MX Mexico Mexican Industrial Property Institute (IMPI) | ||
NZ New Zealand Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand | ||
PH Philippines Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines |
For further discussion |
|
RU Russian Federation Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent |
No |
|
SA Saudi Arabia Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property |
No |
|
SE Sweden Swedish Intellectual Property Office |
No |
|
SK Slovakia Intellectual Property Office of Slovak Republic |
Yes |
|
SM San Marino Ufficio di Stato Brevetti e Marchi |
No |
|
TD Chad Ministry of Commerce and Industry (SNL-OAPI-TCHAD) |
Yes |
|
UA Ukraine State Enterprise "Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute" | ||
UA Ukraine UKRPATENT |
Yes |
|
US United States of America United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Yes |
|
UY Uruguay National Industrial Property Directorate (DNPI) |
Yes |