About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Survey on the Implementation of WIPO Standard ST.91

Collated results

This survey collects information from Industrial Property Offices (IPOs) on their implementation of WIPO Standard ST.91.

  • Purpose: gather and share information on IPOs’ practices of ST.91 implementation
  • Conducted: March to April 2024
  • Survey approved: eleventh session of the Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS)

Notes

  • This data is presented as provided by the respondent. If you have questions about a particular respondent's data, please contact that Office for more information.
  • Empty table cells mean that the respondent did not answer that part of the question. Likewise, a respondent with no entry on a particular question means they did not answer that question.

Survey contents

Click an item to jump to the responses

Survey respondents

ST.3 Code Country or Office
AU

Australia

BG

Bulgaria

BT

Bhutan

CA

Canada

CZ

Czech Republic

DE

Germany

EA

Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO)

EE

Estonia

EM

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

EP

European Patent Office (EPO)

GB

United Kingdom

GM Gambia
HR

Croatia

HU

Hungary

IT

Italy

JP

Japan

KR

Republic of Korea

LT

Lithuania

NA

Namibia

RU

Russian Federation

SK

Slovakia

SY

Syrian Arab Republic

1. Does your Office currently use 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures?

ST.3 Code Response
AU

Yes

BG

No

BT

Yes for Industrial Design and Patent

CA

Yes

CZ

No

DE

Yes

EA

Yes

EE

Yes

EM

Yes

EP

No

GB

Yes

GM No
HR

No

HU

No

IT

No

JP

No

KR

Yes

LT

No

NA

No

RU

Yes

SK

No

SY No

1.1. If yes, for what IP rights:

ST.3 Code Response Other (please specify)
AU Industrial Designs Yes. Designs for 3D models, drawings, and photos are the preferred formats for representations. In some cases, we do accept specimens and 3D models with design applications. However, it is important to note that while we can use a 3D model as a visual aid during the examination process, it won't be considered an official representation. We do not currently use 3D models, images or chemical structures for trade marks.
BG
BT

CA Inventions
CZ
DE

Trademarks

EA Industrial Designs Inventions
EE Trademarks
Industrial Designs
Inventions
Utility models
EM Trademarks
Industrial Designs
EP
GB Trademarks The UK IPO accepts 3D Models and 3D Images for trade marks only. These can be viewed on the UK IPO Internet Case Enquiry service but not via the trade marks journal.
GM
HR
HU
IT
JP
KR Industrial Designs
LT
NA
RU Trademarks
Industrial Designs
Inventions
Utility models
SK
SY

1.2. Does your Office implement WIPO Standard ST.91 within its work?

ST.3 Code Response Additional Comments:
AU

No

No – additional comments below.

BG

No

BT Partially For Industrial Design and patent
CA

No

CIPO does not manage, store, process or exchange 3D models or images. However, CIPO does search and examine 3D chemical structures

CZ

No

DE Partially
EA

Partially

EE

Partially

EM

Partially

EUIPO supports two of the formats recommended by the standard for trademark and design application, OBJ and STL, but it also supports the X3D format, which is not currently recommended in the standard. The maximum file size limit is stablished in 20MB.

EP

No

GB

No

The UK IPO is carrying out a major transformation program. Implementation of ST.91 will be considered in the next phase of the program.

GM

Partially

HR

No

HU

No

IT

No

JP

No

KR

Yes, fully

LT

No

NA

No

RU

Yes, fully

SK

No

SY

No

2.1. What formats of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures does your Office currently accept for each IP right?

ST.3 Code None, my Office doesn’t operate this type of IP right None, my Office doesn’t accept 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures for this type of IP right 3D PDF IGES OBJ STL STEP/STP U3D MOL CDX Other (please specify):
AU Trademarks Industrial Designs Designs - for the submission of 3D image designs, the accepted file format is exclusively PDF limited to 40 MB per file. It is worth noting that in addition to PDF, the acceptable file formats for design images encompass .jpg, .jpeg, .png, .tif, and .tiff. Trade marks – we do not accept any formats of 3D models, images or chemical structures at this stage.
BG Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
BT Trademarks Trademarks Industrial Designs, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
CA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) For inventions (Patents) we search and examine 3D chemical structures using a tool called STN.
CZ
DE Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks Trademarks X3D (it should be discussed to include this format in ST.91, due to the use of this format within the
European Union)
EA Trademarks, Utility models, Integrated circuit topology Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Inventions (3D chemical structures)
EE Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models
EM Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs Trademarks, Industrial Designs X3D, both for Trademarks and Industrial Designs
EP
GB Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks Trademarks The UK IPO also accepts X3D files (as per ST.91) which is not listed above. Integrated Circuit Topology Rights (known in the UK as Semi-Conductor Topography Rights) are an unregistered right in the UK so the UK IPO does not receive any applications/models or images in connection with this right type.
GM Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) N/A
HR Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
HU Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
IT
JP Integrated circuit topology Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
KR Industrial Designs Industrial Designs Industrial Designs Industrial Designs
LT Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
NA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
RU Integrated circuit topology Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models Inventions (3D chemical structures) Inventions (3D chemical structures)
SK Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
SY Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)

2.2. What software does your Office currently use for the visualization of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures during the examination process? Please specify:

ST.3 Code Response
AU

Designs allow customers to upload a PDF that contains a 3D model. These are viewed using Adobe Acrobat

Trade marks do not allow customers to upload 3D models, as such do not incorporate any software for this purpose.

BG

BT Industrial Property Automation System (IPAS)
CA

STN for searching chemical structures

CZ

DE web browser is used for visualizing files containing 3d models. The following 3rd party javascript libraries are used: X3DOM for X3D files and jsc3d-library for Wavefront obj and STL (both binary and ascii) files
EA

STP Viewer
FreeCAD

EE

-

EM

Windows 3D Viewer and Paint 3D, depending on the format.

EP

GB

The UK IPO uses 3rd party JSON script libraries for the visualisation of 3D Models & 3D Images for Trade Marks

GM

N/A

HR

n/a

HU NONE
IT
JP JPO currently doesn't use software for the visualization of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures during the examination process.
KR CADian Viewer(developed by a domestic company)
LT -
NA None
RU
Rospatent uses the in-house developed information system, specifically designed for the IPO given the experts needs and requirements, including visualization and search modules.
SK -
SY None

2.3. What formats of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures does your Office currently use for the electronic publication for each IP right operated by Office?

ST.3 Code None, my Office doesn’t operate this type of IP right None, my Office doesn’t publish information of
this type of IP right electronically
None, my Office doesn’t publish information of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures electronically even if they were accepted 2D images received by my Office from the source 3D models or 3D images 3D PDF IGES OBJ STL STEP/STP U3D MOL CDX Other (please specify):
AU Trademarks, Industrial
Designs
Designs do not publish 3D formats. They are used for internal reference only. This is also the case for trade marks.
BG Industrial designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
BT Trademarks Trademarks Trademarks Industrial designs, Inventions
(3D chemical structures)
CA

Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) For inventions (Patents) we search and examine 3D chemical structures using a tool called STN.
CZ
DE Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks Trademarks X3D (it should be discussed to include this format in ST.91, due to the use of this format within the European Union)
EA Trademarks, Utility models, Integrated circuit topology Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Inventions (3D chemical structures)
EE Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models 2D PDF
EM Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions
(3D chemical structures)
Industrial Designs Trademarks, Industrial Designs Trademarks, Industrial Designs X3D, both for Trademarks and Industrial Designs
EP
GB Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions
(3D chemical structures)
Industrial designs, Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions
(3D chemical structures)
Trademarks Trademarks The UK IPO also accepts X3D files (as per ST.91) which is not listed above. Integrated Circuit Topology Rights (known in the UK as Semi-Conductor Topography Rights) are an unregistered right in the UK so the UK IPO does not receive any applications/models or images in connection with this right type.
GM Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
HU Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
HR Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
IT
JP Integrated circuit topology Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
KR Industrial Designs Industrial Designs Industrial Designs Industrial Designs
LT Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
NA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
RU Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models
SK Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
SY Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)

2.4. What software does your Office currently use for the electronic publication of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures?

ST.3 Code Response
AU Designs do not publish 3D formats. They are used for internal reference only. This is also the case for trade marks.
BG

N/A

BT Industrial Property Automation System (IPAS)
CA

Not applicable

CZ

DE web browser is used for visualizing files containing 3d models. The following 3rd party javascript libraries are used: X3DOM for X3D files and jsc3d-library for Wavefront obj and STL (both binary and ascii) files
EA We use custom tool for conversion of filed 3D formats into 3D PDF, based on the solution implemented in cooperation with FIPS/Rospatent.
EE

2D PDF

EM

JSC3D and X3DOM JavaScript libraries

EP

GB None
GM N/A
HR

n/a

HU NONE
IT
JP JPO currently doesn't use software for the electronic publication of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures.
KR PDF Viewer
LT -
NA None
RU Rospatent uses the in-house developed information system, specifically designed for the IPO given the experts needs and requirements, including visualization and search modules. The system is also capable of creating 3D PDF of each 3D
representation filed, that is further published as part of the official e-publication in PDF format at post-registration stage or filed application in line with the publication rules and requirements depending on the IPR type
SK -
SY None

2.5. What formats of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures does your Office currently use for the paper publication for each IP right?

ST.3 Code None, my Office doesn’t operate this type of IP right None, my Office doesn’t publish information of this type of IP right on paper None, my Office doesn’t publish information of 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures on paper even if they were accepted 2D images received by Office from the source 3D models or 3D images Link to the 3D object online Other (please specify)
AU Trademarks, Industrial Deisgns None, my Office doesn't publish information of this type of IP right on paper. Designs do not publish 3D formats. They are used for internal reference only. This is also the case for trade marks.
BG Industrial
Designs, Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated
circuit
topology, Inventions
(3D
chemical
structures)
BT Trademarks, Industrial Designs Trademarks, Industrial Designs Trademarks, Industrial Designs
CA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
CZ
DE Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks Paper publications relating to 3d-marks embed a printable QR-Code which contains a link to the 3d model file in DPMAregister
EA Trademarks, Utility models, Integrated circuit topology Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Inventions (3D chemical structures)
EE The publications are only available in electronic form
EM Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Industrial Designs Trademarks Note. EUIPO does not publish data on paper format, so the responses refer to the "printable" publication of IP rights data (i.e. gazettes).
EP
GB Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) The UK IPO no longer publishes on paper and has not done so for 10+ years
GM Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
HR Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
HU Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures) Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
IT
JP Integrated
circuit
topology
Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
KR Industrial Designs
LT Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
NA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
RU Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
SK Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)
SY Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology, Inventions (3D chemical structures)

2.6. Does your Office carry out search for the comparison of the 3D models and 3D images with 3D models and 3D images during the examination process and if so, in what formats for each IP right?

ST.3 Code No Yes, my Office uses 2D representations of 3D models for the comparison Yes, my Office uses 3D models themselves for the comparison Other (please specify)
AU Trademarks, Industrial Deisgns No. We can use a 3D model as a visual aid during the examination process, however it won't be considered an official representation. This implies: The applicant is still required to submit 2D representations. The 3D model won't influence the scope of protection for the design. The 3D model won't be included in the Australian Design Search database, the Australian Journal of Designs, or any certificates. For trade marks, we do not utilise 3D models in the course of examination. The applicant is required to submit a 2D representation for shape marks in isometric or perspective drawings, along with a description of the shape in the form of an endorsement.
BG Industrial
Designs, Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated
circuit
topology
BT Trademarks Industrial Designs Industrial Designs
CA Trademarks, Industrial
Designs, Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated
circuit
topology
CIPO received 2D representation of 3D chemical structures. Employees create a 3D representation in the search tool STN and do a search against the database.
CZ
DE Trademarks, Industrial
Designs, Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated
circuit topology
EA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
EE Trademarks, Industrial Designs Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models
EM Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
EP
GB Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology Trademarks
GM Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology N/A
HR Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
HU Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
IT
JP Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
KR Industrial Designs
LT Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
NA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
RU Integrated circuit topology Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models
SK Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
SY Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology

2.7. What software does your Office currently use for the comparison of the 3D models and 3D images with 3D models and 3D images during the examination process? Please specify:

ST.3 Code Response
AU

Designs are viewed using Adobe Acrobat, which includes a PDF that contains a 3D model. There is no other software used during the examination process that compares 3D models to 3D images. There is no software being used for trade marks.

BG

BT Industrial Property Automation System (IPAS)
CA

We use STN to compare 2D chemical structures that we receive as part of the application against 3D structures that are in the STN database.

CZ

DE
EA
EE No any specific software. The experts engage in visual comparison
EM

Not applicable

EP

GB ACSEPTO is used for examiners & external customers to view 3D models & 3D images for trade marks
GM

N/A

HR

n/a

HU NONE
IT
JP JPO currently doesn't use software for the comparison of the 3D models and 3D images with 3D models and 3D images during
the examination process.
KR KIPO does not directly compare 3d images with 3d images during the examination process.
LT -
NA none
RU

Rospatent uses the in-house developed information system, specifically designed for the IPO given the experts needs and
requirements, including visualization and search modules.

Seach module was designed and developed using both statistical and AI methods (Siamese neural network) to carry out search
and comparison of 3D visual representations

SK -
SY None

2.8. Does your Office carry out search for the comparison of the 3D models and 3D images with 2D images during the examination process and if so, in what formats for each IP rights?

ST.3 Code No Yes, my Office uses 2D representations of 3D models for the comparison Yes, my Office uses 3D representations of 2D images for the comparison Other (please specify)
AU

Trademarks, Industrial Deisgns

BG Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
BT Trademarks Industrial Designs Industrial Designs
CA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated
circuit topology
CZ
DE Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions
(except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated
circuit topology
EA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
EE Trademarks, Industrial Designs Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models
EM Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
EP
GB Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology Trademarks Trademarks
GM Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology N/A
HR Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology Trademarks, Industrial Designs
HU Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
IT
JP Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
KR Industrial Designs
LT Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
NA Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
RU Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Intregrated circuit typology Trademarks, Industrial Designs
SK Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology
SY Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Inventions (except 3D chemical structures), Utility models, Integrated circuit topology

2.9. What software does your Office currently use for the comparison of the 3D models and 3D images with 2D images during the examination process?

AU

For 3D Designs models, drawings, and photos are the preferred formats for representations, filed as a PDF using Adobe Acrobat.

While we can use a 3D model as a visual aid during the examination process, it won't be considered an official representation.

This implies:
The applicant is still required to submit 2D representations.

The 3D model won't influence the scope of protection for the design.

The 3D model won't be included in the Australian Design Search database, the Australian Journal of Designs, or any certificates.

BG
BT Industrial Property Automation System (IPAS)
CA

Not applicable

CZ

DE
EA
EE No any specific software. The experts engage in visual comparison
EM Not applicable
EP
GB ACSEPTO is used for trade mark searching
GM

N/A

HR

We use standard image (JPG) Windows viewer

HU NONE
IT
JP JPO currently doesn't use software for the comparison of the 3D models and 3D images with 2D images during the examination process.
KR Internal prior design search system and AI image search system which is based on a self-developed model.
LT -
NA none
RU Rospatent uses the in-house developed information system to automatically create 2D views of filed 3D representations as recommended by the Standard, that also allows experts to manually adding other 2D representations. Such an approach is also
applied in other in-house developed information systems to carry out similarity search of trademarks and industrial designs 2D representations
SK -
SY None

3.1. Please describe existing practices or future plans for using 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures within your Office

ST.3 Code Changed to “Active”
AU

Designs - ACIP Designs Review Recommendation 21 Decision

Regarding Recommendation 21 from the ACIP Designs Review, the acceptance of 3D models for designs, ACIP has concluded that no changes should be made to the designs system at this time in response to 3D printing and scanning technologies.

There are currently no existing or future plans to cater for 3D models, images or chemical structures with respect to trade marks.

BG
BT I don't have specific information regarding the utilization of 3D models, 3D images, or 3D chemical structures within the Office in Bhutan.
CA

During CIPO's modernization of its legacy systems there are plans to look at emerging technologies which could include looking at the need and feasibility of implementing the use of tools for 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures.

CZ Our office currently uses 2D images throughout the IP right lifecycle. We have noted some interest from applicants regarding the filing of 3D models in the area of industrial designs.
DE Considering 3D models for Community Designs in future
EA We plan to introduce search tools for the comparison of the 3D models and 3D images.
EE There are no plans for the near term
EM

EUIPO currently accepts 3D models (OBJ, STL, X3D) to represent three-dimensional trademarks and designs. When filing a design application with a 3D model, the user must select up to 7 views that will be protected.

The EUIPO is undergoing impact assessment for the upcoming legislative reform of the design regulation, which might impact the current practice of the Office.

EP
GB As noted in our response to Question 1.2 the UK IPO is about to start the second phase of a major IT transformation program.
We will be considering our existing and future plans for using 3D models & 3D images at this time.
GM Our office would like to engage CWS member offices using their 3D tools to learn from best practices before implementation.
HR

No current plan

HU N/A
IT Three-dimensional trademarks are accepted, but the filing format of the electronic file is JPEG.
JP
KR KIPO has introduced 3D images in industrial design since 2010, and efforts are being made to continuously improve performance and stabilize the system by collecting user opinions.
LT Our office use 2D images of 3D models
NA We are still reading more on the subject matter.
RU Currently, 3D representations are considered as supplementary material in applications for trademarks, industrial designs, inventions and utility models. The in-house information system is used for processing applications, containing 3D visual representations. The current work is focused on collecting more 3D representations to properly train the neural network.
Furthermore, the work is ongoing to integrate search capabilities into the patent search system, in addition to the trademarks and industrial designs search system.
SK Office uses 2D representations of 3D models in the JPG file format with file size till to 2 MB a resolution = 300 dpi
SY

3.2. Please describe existing practices or future plans relating to the implementation of WIPO Standard ST.91 within your Office

ST.3 Code Response
AU

The topic of accepting 3D models for designs was discussed during the ACIP Designs Review Recommendation 21

The historical context surrounding this matter traces back to its introduction, which occurred around the year 2017. Initially, the incorporation of 3D filing options was primarily intended to serve as a visual aid to assist examiners in their tasks. It is important that challenges persist with regard to the publication of such representations on the Australian Designs System (ADS). During that period, our organisation held a supportive stance toward embracing advancing technology and recognising the advantages it presented to both our customers and staff members in the utilisation of 3D files.

In principle, the idea of permitting 3D representations as an additional means for design assessment appeared commendable. However, we also had to carefully consider the capabilities of our systems, as well as the essential requirement for 2D representations, particularly for convention filings and to accommodate customers filing in jurisdictions that do not facilitate the use of 3D files.

There are currently no such existing or future plans to cater for 3D models, images or chemical structures with respect to trade marks.

BG

BT For the implementation of WIPO Standard ST.91 within our office, the initial step entails revising our Industrial Property Act of the Kingdom of Bhutan, 2001, particularly focusing on trademarks.
CA

In the event that CIPO uses 3D models, 3D images or 3D chemical structures, CIPO plans to leverage the WIPO Standard.91.

CZ Our office currently uses 2D images throughout the IP right lifecycle. Due to task prioritization we do not have specific plans to implement ST.91 as of now. We do expect to implement ST.91 if 3D models are adopted within our office in the future.
DE Future plans depend more on activities of EUIPO rather than on WIPO Standard ST.91
EA We plan to cover all formats of 3D models and 3D images recommended by the WIPO Standard ST.91.
EE Under study
EM

As indicated in question 1.2, EUIPO only partially implements ST.91's recommended file extensions. A consultation has been launched with the 3D Task Force to clarify the reasons for excluding the X3D format from the recommended formats in ST.91.

Regarding points 11 and 12 in ST.91, which state that 'If required, at an applicant's request the receiving IPO can accept files larger than the said maximum', EUIPO has no plans to alter the current file size limits.

EP
GB Please see our response to Questions 1.2 & 3.1
GM Our office does not practice the using of 3D tools as it is not in existence within our office. On that note we would like to be engaged with TF members offices already using the tools to learn from best practices before implementation.
HR

No current plan

HU N/A
IT
JP
KR KIPO has fully implemented ST.91 since last December, and we are now working on monitoring the system and performance improvements.
LT There are no existing future plans for ST.91 WIPO Standard implementation
NA We are still reading more on the subject matter
RU Currently, Rospatent fully implements WIPO Standard ST.91
SK -
SY In the meetings of the National Committee on the National Intellectual Property Strategy I suggested including 3D models and 3D images of intellectual property laws in Syria, to help creators identify the most appropriate forms of protection for their 3D models and images. Therefore in the future WIPO Standard ST.91 will be used in our office

4. Any other comments. Please specify:

ST.3 Code Response
AU N/A
BG

BT Bhutan has attended the WIPO Standard Committee meeting only once; as a result, we struggle to keep up with international norms.
CA

CZ
DE
EA
EE

EM None
EP

GB

None

GM

N/A

HR

HU
IT
JP
KR
LT -
NA none
RU
SK -
SY 1- I suggest creating a pilot testing program for WIPO Standard ST.91 and other WIPO standards with Member States to urge Member States to deal with these standards, spread a culture of their use, and ensure practical application and effectiveness in Member States.
Updated WIPO Standard ST.91 and other WIPO standards based on feedback from pilot testing program. including guidance on best practices and compliance requirements.
2- Due to the spread of hologram technology and its use in trademarks and advertising, this requires effective protection for it.
Therefore, I propose to find a special standard for hologram technology and not on the basis of video or 3D images.