About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

In the News

July 2007

Managing IP in Health and Agricultural Innovation

Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, released in May, is a joint publication of the U.K.’s Centre for the Management of Intellectual Property in Health Research and Development (MIHR) and Public Intellectual Property Resource in Agriculture (PIPRA). Written by practitioners in the field, its 153 chapters aim to provide a comprehensive resource on current IP management issues and approaches, with strategies for utilizing the power of both IP and the public domain. The book illustrates how IP can be leveraged judiciously to forge stronger partnerships and usher in a new age of collaboration and sharing. 

Lita Nelsen, head of technology transfer for MIT and one of the editors of the two volume work, describes it as "the how-to manual for using the tool of IP," geared toward two distinct audiences: research institutions and technology transfer operations in developing countries; and first world institutions, “to make sure that they consider the needs of developing countries when they license important IP in medicines, vaccines, and foods, and do it right.”

The MIHR, a not-for-profit organization, seeks to foster innovative practices in the ethical stewardship of IP for the social and economic benefit of developing countries. It has created regional networks of professionals engaged in technology transfer, and has been involved in developing technology transfer management skills in more than 200 institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa, India and Southeast Asia. In industrialized countries, MIHR promotes the use of IP tools for “humanitarian licensing” to help technologies reach impoverished populations.

________________
 

*

Kenya signs Biodiversity Deal with Novozymes

The Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) and Novozymes, a Danish biotech company, announced in June that they had signed a five-year agreement on biological diversity, in line with the principles of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. 

Novozymes and KWS will embark on a collaborative project to characterize Kenyan microbial diversity from specific biological niches. As part of the project Novozymes will train Kenyan students in taxonomy, isolation and identification of micro-organisms. Novozymes will also transfer advanced technology to Kenya, including knowledge of how to collect and isolate micro-organisms and how to characterize microbial diversity.

The agreement gives Novozymes the right to make commercial use of Kenya’s microbial diversity in return for financial compensation, and for local capacity-building – in the shape of a Kenyan laboratory facility with the necessary materials for implementing enzyme screening in Kenya. If Novozymes commercializes products developed on the basis of microbial strains isolated as part of the project, KWS will receive a milestone payment and a running royalty from sales.

 KWS Director Julius Kipng’etich, told SciDev.Net that Kenya's microbial diversity is largely unexploited, and could greatly benefit the country. He added, "Tourism is low level income generation. We need to graduate to a higher level where biotechnology takes us. We have planted a seed that will take Kenya places."
 
________________
 

*

Investment in Domain Name Pays Off

 They were taunted as fools when they paid US$7.5 million for the www.business.com domain name in 1999, the highest sum ever paid for a single domain name, but Jake Winebaum and Sky Dayton may yet have the last laugh. The site built around the name is now being put up for auction where, the Wall Street Journal reports, it is expected to fetch as much as US$300 to 400 million.

The user-friendly business.com site describes itself as the leading business-to-business (B2B) search engine and pay-per-click advertising network, visited each month by some 6 million business users looking for products and services on the Internet. It was ranked by Inc. Magazine last year as the fifth fastest growing private media company in the U.S., now earning US$15 million a year. 

Crédit Suisse will run the auction which is expected to attract major big media players like the New York Times, Dow Jones & Co., Thomson and Bloomberg.

________________
 

Workshop -Copyright and Related Rights in the Audiovisual Sector

A WIPO national workshop on Copyright and Related Rights in the Film and Audiovisual Sector was held in Beijing, China, on May 24 and 25, in cooperation with the China’s State Administration for Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) and Film Copyright Protection Association. Senior government officials, producers, and film industry legal advisers from across China joined speakers from the International Federation of Actors, the Motion Picture Association, and the Audiovisual Producers’ Rights Management Association (EGEDA), a network of Latin American and Spanish audiovisual producers. Opening the workshop, Mr. Tong Gang, Director General of the SARFT Film Bureau, and WIPO Assistant Director General Ms. Wang Binying underlined the importance of cooperation between SARFT and WIPO at a time of great change for copyright legislation and collective management in China and the wider world.

The workshop compared how copyright law, collective management and licensing are applied to audiovisual works and performances in China, the U.S., Europe and Latin America. In China, the speakers explained, the producer is considered as the maker and original copyright owner of the film. Similarly in the U.S., albeit via the different route of “work for hire,” the producer is considered as the initial owner of all the intellectual contributions to the film production made by directors, performers, etc. Collective bargaining agreements then determine the remuneration of the performers in proportion to the result of the exploitation of film.

In Europe and Latin America, the system is based on both copyright and neighboring statutory rights, whereby the film maker, script writer, music composer, etc. are deemed authors and original rights owners in the film, and performers are granted neighboring or related rights over their performances. In most cases the producer ensures that all rights needed for the exploitation of the film are obtained thanks to a system of presumptions of transfer. Different legal mechanisms in different jurisdictions ensure that the remuneration of authors and performers is linked to the result of the exploitation.
 

Those present agreed that it was important, under all these systems, to compensate performers in a fair an adequate manner, while respecting the producer’s economic ability to exploit the film. An interesting debate ensued on the advantages and disadvantages of a system based on collective bargaining, or on statutory and neighboring rights combined with collective management. There was also general agreement as to the need to promote legitimate use of audiovisual content and fight against piracy

________________

The WIPO Magazine is intended to help broaden public understanding of intellectual property and of WIPO’s work, and is not an official document of WIPO. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WIPO concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication is not intended to reflect the views of the Member States or the WIPO Secretariat. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WIPO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.