About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Beginning of a New Era for the Lisbon System

December 2008

The 50th anniversary celebration of the Lisbon Agreement on the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration took place at a ceremony on October 31 in Lisbon. The ceremony rounded off a two-day Forum, co-hosted by WIPO and the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) of Portugal in the city which gave birth to the Agreement in 1958, after many years of difficult negotiations.

WIPO Director General Francis Gurry addressed over 200 participants from some 50 countries during the ceremony, stressing the importance of geographical indications as a means of differentiating products within an increasingly global, and ever-more standardized, marketplace. He also underscored their “enormous potential, in particular to developing countries, in terms of allowing them to reap the benefits of added value based on unique characteristics of certain products originating in these countries, including products derived from traditional knowledge.” He urged Member States to demonstrate the same pioneering spirit and determination as that of the great Portuguese explorers in advancing the future development of the Lisbon system.

*
The Lisbon System’s 50th anniversary ceremony was headed by Mr. Christophe Guilhou, Chair, Lisbon Union Assembly, Mr. Francis Gurry, Director General, WIPO, and Mr. António Campinos, President, National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI),Portugal.

Lisbon attracts new adherents

Geographical indications are understood by consumers to denote the origin and the quality of products. Although many geographical indications and appellations of origin concern agricultural products, other goods with a unique identity deriving from a specific region can also benefit from this form of intellectual property. The Lisbon Agreement provides an international legal framework with a large degree of flexibility in its implementation by contracting parties without impinging on the effectiveness of protection accorded to geographical indications registered internationally.

In the first four decades of its existence, the Lisbon Agreement attracted only a small number of Member States. During that period there were various unsuccessful attempts to create a new system for the international registration of geographical indications that would have a much wider geographical coverage. However, since 1997, ten new countries have acceded to the Lisbon Agreement and several others are considering doing so.

What lies behind this renewed interest? First, many countries have established national systems for the protection of geographical indications that focus on a delimitation of the relevant geographical area based on criteria corresponding to those applicable under the Lisbon Agreement with respect to appellations of origin. Second, unlike the TRIPS Agreement1 – which prescribes a higher level of protection for geographical indications for wines and spirits than it does for other products – the Lisbon Agreement requires Member States to protect all appellations of origin, regardless of the product category to which they relate. This is certainly important to the many countries whose geographical indications concern products other than wines or spirits.

Possible improvements to the existing procedures under the Lisbon Agreement will be explored in more formal international discussions scheduled to take place in March of next year within the context of a Working Group established in September 2008 by the Assembly of the Lisbon Union. This will provide an opportunity to build on an Agreement that elegantly combines effective protection with flexible application – an instrument whose time has come and that may well still be thriving in another 50 years’ time.

Forum explores challenges

Discussions during the Forum included the challenges facing the Lisbon System; interpretation of the provisions of the Agreement in the light of its negotiating history; and its possible link to regional systems such as those existing in the European Community and the African Organization for Intellectual Property. The Forum also discussed the opportunities that geographical indications and appellations of origin offer to products from developing countries and the importance of facilitating their international protection. The Forum served to promote a better understanding of the Lisbon System ahead of the more formal international discussions scheduled to take place in March.


1. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, of the World Trade Organization (WTO)

Related Links

The WIPO Magazine is intended to help broaden public understanding of intellectual property and of WIPO’s work, and is not an official document of WIPO. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WIPO concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication is not intended to reflect the views of the Member States or the WIPO Secretariat. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WIPO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.