About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Letters and comment

July 2009

Your readers may be interested to learn that the long awaited decision of the Court of First Instance of Paris on the EBay vs L’Oréal case finally came through on May 13 after several postponements. The case was mentioned in the conclusion of the WIPO Magazine 3/2009 article: “Legal Pioneering at the Online Auction Frontier”. Contrary to the main case discussed in that article and others it mentioned, the Court ruled that the liability of eBay – an Internet host – could only be enforced in cases of evidenced knowledge of the infringing content and failure to remedy thereto.

The L’Oréal suit, launched in 2007, alleged trademark infringement and breach of selected distribution networks by eBay companies. L’Oréal argued that eBay qualified as a website editor with brokerage activities, which under French practice makes eBay fully responsible for the content of its website. The auction site was said to actively intervene in the promotion of cosmetic and perfume products, and to earn money on their sales. L’Oréal claimed 3.5 million euros in damages.

EBay opposed the plaintiff’s position, claiming it was an intermediary, offering solely hosting services and lacking control over users and the contents of their ads. “Power seller” programs, eBay shops or Paypal protection were presented as only aiming at enhancing sellers’ auctions. As a hosting company, eBay is not bound by a general obligation to monitor the content of their website.

The Court agreed with eBay’s arguments and ruled that eBay acted in good faith by establishing strong means to fight counterfeiting. With this difference in positions between Courts of First Instance, a Court of Appeal decision would now be welcome.

But this new decision is in line with the decision of the U.S. District Court (Southern District of New York, July 14, 2008) regarding eBay’s generalized knowledge that some auctions are counterfeiting as insufficient to rule eBay as liable for trademark infringement.  In August 2008, a Belgian Court decision also favored the auction site over L’Oréal, ruling that eBay had no obligation to systematically watch which products were being offered up for sale. A court in the U.K. took the same position on May 22, 2009 (pending a referral to the ECJ). L’Oréal’s only win has been in the German Courts. A decision is yet to come from Spain.

Franck Soutoul and Jean-Philippe Bresson, Inlex IP Expertise

 

The WIPO Magazine is intended to help broaden public understanding of intellectual property and of WIPO’s work, and is not an official document of WIPO. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WIPO concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication is not intended to reflect the views of the Member States or the WIPO Secretariat. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WIPO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.