About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

In the Pipeline: A New Treaty for Designers

October 2024

By Marcus Höpperger, Senior Director, Brands and Designs Sector, WIPO, Marie-Paule Rizo, Head, Policy and Legislative Advice Section, WIPO, and Marina Foschi, Senior Legal Officer, WIPO

In November, WIPO member states, intergovernmental organizations and observers will meet in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to finalize and adopt a new design law treaty (DLT) set to facilitate design protection throughout the world.

Industrial design of a motor car/Automobile/Automóvil, registered by FERRARI S.p.A. under WIPO’s Hague System (International registration number DM/218 451).

In 2022, the WIPO General Assembly decided to convene a diplomatic conference to conclude negotiations on the DLT, which has been years in the making . But what is design? And what difference is the treaty expected to make to designers?

Design encompasses many fields, from furniture, fashion and packaging design to product, software and automotive design. At its most basic, design dictates an object’s look and feel. It is all around us, in the clothes we wear, the chair we sit on and the app we use to check the weather. Design also plays a key role in the market success of products – we buy things not only because we need them but also because we like their design.

The objective of the treaty is to make it easier for designers to protect their works around the globe and thereby make a more secure living.

Securing IP protection is key

Businesses invest time and money in design R&D because they know that design can influence consumers and give them a competitive edge in the marketplace. When not protected by IP rights, however, those investments may be for naught. Without protection, a design can be copied by free riders as soon as it is launched. That limits its creator’s competitive advantage and the design’s unique appeal to consumers. Securing IP protection is, therefore, a key step in any creative process, as it provides exclusive rights and makes available legal remedies to prevent others from copying and commercially exploiting designs without permission.

Business understands this. Statistics published by WIPO based on global data reveal that industrial design applications worldwide totaled 1.1 million in 2022 and showed a near-steady increase of designs contained therein between 2008 and 2022.

Protection procedures: a maze?

The process for protecting designs can seem like a maze and the hurdles today are twofold.

First, the means of protecting design vary from one country to another. In some countries, designs must be filed as “registered designs”. Registration systems may involve the examination of design applications by the IP office, and what that involves varies from country to country. In other jurisdictions, designs are protected under patent law as “design patents”, which are usually only granted after a thorough examination of the design application by the IP office.

Second, and regardless of whether protection is obtained via registration or through the grant of a design patent, designers generally must follow the filing procedures set by the IP office of the country in which they are seeking protection. Because design rights are territorial and thus limited to the country or region in which protection was obtained, designers must go through the same process in each country or region where they wish to protect their designs.

All of this makes it difficult and cumbersome for designers to protect their designs in multiple jurisdictions.

The main visual for the WIPO Conference on Design Law is a combination of the “Riyadh 2024ˮ emblem developed by the Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property (SAIP) with the official Conference title on the left and the WIPO logo on the right. (Photo: SAIP, WIPO)

DLT to the rescue

The DLT, if adopted, will simplify and streamline protection procedures and eliminate red tape. This will help to make the framework for design protection procedures more predictable and make the procedures themselves less complex and more affordable. It will be easier for designers to file applications in several different jurisdictions.

What the treaty will do

  • set a maximum list of indications or elements that designers must submit with an application. Establishing a closed list of elements will help to create a predictable framework for design protection procedures: designers wishing to file an application will know exactly what indications or elements may be required.
  • allow applicants to choose how they represent the design in an application (drawings, photographs or, if admitted by the IP office, video).
  • allow applicants to include several designs in a single application, under certain conditions.
  • set out requirements for the granting of a filing date. Keeping the list of filing-date requirements for design applications to a minimum is crucial because, in the field of design, postponing the filing date can result in a definitive loss of rights.
  • provide for a grace period of six or 12 months following a first disclosure of the design, during which such disclosure will not affect its novelty.
  • allow applicants to keep their designs unpublished for at least six months after having secured a filing date.
  • provide relief measures and offer some flexibility to applicants to prevent them from losing their rights if they miss a deadline. Without such measures, missing a time limit generally results in a loss of rights. In the case of designs, that loss is irreparable.
  • simplify the procedure for requesting the renewal of a design registration.

The journey to the Diplomatic Conference

The goal of the Diplomatic Conference is to complete a journey that began in 2005, when, at its 15th session, the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) agreed to start working on design registration procedures.

Over the years, the Committee has scrutinized those procedures, which lie at the core of the treaty, and other related issues. It has also worked to ensure that the draft treaty’s provisions comply with the WIPO Development Agenda Recommendations, adopted by the WIPO General Assembly in 2007 to put development considerations at the heart of the Organization’s work.

The process leading up to the Diplomatic Conference has been inclusive, taking into account the different levels of development, interests and priorities of WIPO member states, and the viewpoints of other stakeholders. In its work on the draft treaty, the Committee has also taken into account the need for flexibility in international IP agreements, especially those of interest to developing and least-developed countries.

The Thirty-Fourth Session of WIPO's Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) took place in Geneva, Switzerland from November 16 to 18, 2015. (Photo: WIPO/Emmanuel Berrod)

The Committee has had years to fine tune the draft articles of the treaty and the related draft regulations, which were prepared by the secretariat in addition to other documents, including a questionnaire on design formalities and procedures and a study of the potential impact of the Committee’s work. However, discussions on two outstanding issues had prevented agreement on convening a diplomatic conference until the breakthrough decision made in 2022.

The first issue concerns technical assistance and capacity-building. Several proposals in that regard were made as early as 2012 and 2013 by the African Group, the Delegation of the European Union, on behalf of the European Union and its member states, and the Delegation of the Republic of Korea. All delegations agree on the importance of such assistance for implementing the treaty. However, whether it should be enshrined in an article of the treaty or be addressed in a specific resolution will only be decided at the Diplomatic Conference.

The second issue relates to a proposal made in November 2015 by the African Group. To prevent the misappropriation of traditional designs, the African Group proposed including in Article 3(1)(a) of the draft treaty – which sets a maximum list of indications or elements to be included in a design application – a non-mandatory requirement to disclose the origin or source of traditional cultural expressions, traditional knowledge or biological/genetic resources used in or incorporated into the industrial design. Some delegations, however, did not support the proposal. In 2019, Ambassador Socorro Flores Liera from Mexico, acting as a facilitator for negotiations, proposed a compromise provision, which will also be discussed at the Diplomatic Conference.

It is now incumbent on the participants in the Diplomatic Conference to find agreement on the remaining unresolved issues and to adopt this new treaty, which would facilitate global design protection and constitute a breakthrough that has been many years in the making.

The Diplomatic Conference to Conclude and Adopt a Design Law Treaty takes place from 11 to 22 November 2024. Further information and all meeting documents are available on the WIPO website.

Any views expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of WIPO or its member states.

The WIPO Magazine is intended to help broaden public understanding of intellectual property and of WIPO’s work, and is not an official document of WIPO. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WIPO concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication is not intended to reflect the views of the Member States or the WIPO Secretariat. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WIPO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.