About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 113-95, Philippines

Back
Latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 1995 Dates Entry into force: October 2, 1995 Adopted: October 2, 1995 Type of Text Implementing Rules/Regulations Subject Matter Enforcement of IP and Related Laws, Other Notes The notification by the Philippines to the WTO under article 63.2 of TRIPS states:
'This Order designates the courts especially charged of knowing the cases that imply violations of intellectual property rights and of ruling on them.'

Available Materials

Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) English Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 113-95        
 
Download PDF open_in_new
 SC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 113-95

SC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 113-95,

October 02, 1995

RE: DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL COURTS FORINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

In the interest of an efficient administration of justice and to ensure speedy disposition of cases involving violation of Intellectual Property Rights, the following Branches of the Regional Trial Courts, Metropolitan Trial Courts and Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, presently presided over by their respective trial judges as herein below indicated, are hereby specially designated to try and decide cases for violations of Intellectual Property Rights such as, but riot limited to, violations of Art. 188 of the Revised Penal Code (Substituting and Altering Trademarks, Trade Names, or Service Marks), Art. 189 of the Revised Penal Code (Unfair Competition, Fraudulent Registration of Trade Name, Trademark or Service Mark, Fraudulent Designation of Origin, and False Description), Presidential Degree No. 49 (Protection of Intellectual Property Rights), Presidential Degree No. 87 (An Act Creating-the Videogram Regulatory Board), Republic Act No. 165 "as amended (The Patent Law), and Republic Act 166 as amended' (The Trademark Law) committed within their respective territorial areas:

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT

National Capital Region Name Branch Station

Hon. Rebecca de Guia- Salvador 1 Manila

Hon. Reynaldo B. Daway 90 Quezon City Hon. Nemesio S. Felix 56 Makati City Hon. Alfredo C. Flores 167 Pasig City Hon. Aurora K Reciña 119 Pasay City Hon. Jaime T. Hamoy 130 Kalookan City Hon. Benjamin T. Antonio 170 Malabon Hon. Ruben P. dela Cruz 272 Marikina Hon. Raul E. de Leon 258 Parañaque Hon. Florentino M. Alumbres 255 Las Piñas Hon. Alberto L. Lerma 256 Muntinlupa Hon. Floro P. Alejo 172 Valenzuela

REGION III Hon. Arturo G. Tayag 79 Malolos, Bulacan

Hon. Hermin E. Arceo 43 San Fernando,Pampanga Hon. Eliezer R. delos Santos 59 Angeles City

REGION IV Hon. Mario V. Lopez 2 Batangas City Hon. Jane Aurora C. Lantion 13 Lipa City Hon. Francisco D. Pano 93 San Pedro, Laguna Hon. Marivic B. Umali 30 San Pablo City Hon. Antonio M. Eugenio, Jr. 34 Calamba, Laguna Hon. Rodrigo V. Cosico 24 Biñan, Laguna

REGION VI Hon. Jose G. Abdallah 39 Iloilo City Hon. Anastacio I. Lobaton 44 Bacolod City

REGION VII Hon. Benignc G. Gaviola 9 Cebu City

REGION IX Hon. Vicente L. Cabatingan 15 Zamboanga City

REGION X Hon. Arcadio O. Fabria 21 Cagayan de Oro City

REGION XI Hon. Augusto V. Branch 10 Davao City

METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT/MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES

National Capital Region Hon. Amelia A. Fabros 9 Manila Hon. Susanita M. Parker 40 Quezon City Hon. Estrellita M-. Paas 44 Pasay City Hon. Delfina H. Santiago 52 Kalookan City

Hon. Ma. Luisa Q. Padilla 60 Mandaluyong City Hon. Ernesto T. Trinidad 63 Makati City Hon. Alex L. Quiroz 69 Pasig City Hon. Alex E. Ruiz 76 Marikina

REGION III

Hon. Orlando C. Paguio 1 Meycauayan,Bulacan Hon. Mario B. Capellan 1 Malolos, Bulacan

Hon. Rodrigo R. Flores 2 San Fernando ,Pampanga Hon. Aida E. Layug 3 Angeles City Hon. Eduardo D. Alfonso, Jr. 5 Olongapo City

REGION IV Hon. Ruben A. Galvez 1 Batangas City

Hon. Amalia S. Cuapiaco 1 Cavite City

REGION VI Hon. Alfredo D. Hilario 1 Bacolod City Hon. Alexis A. Zerrudo 4 Iloilo , City

REGION VII Hon. Antonio F. Paraguya 6 Cebu City

REGION IX Hon. Efren S. Mariano 2 Zamboanga City

REGION X Hon. Antonio A. Orcullo 3 Cagayan de Oro City

REGION XI Hon. Roberto Q. Cañete 5 Davao City

All single sala courts with which cases for violation of Intellectual Property Rights are or may be filed shall take cognizance of them as if they have been designated as special courts, and for that matter, shall give them priority in their trial calendars.

The trial of cases for violation of Intellectual Property Rights covered by this Administrative Order shall be immediately commenced and shall continue from day to day to be terminated as far as practicable within sixty (60) days from initial trial. Judgment thereon shall be rendered within thirty (30) days from date of submission for decision.

All cases referred to herein where trial has already started shall remain in the branches where they are presently assigned. However, cases where pre-trial has not yet commenced shall be transferred immediately to the branches herein designated.

The Executive Judges of the Special Courts herein designated may exclude such courts from the raffle of new cases whenever in their judgment the caseloads of said Courts so designated shall not allow them to try these special cases with efficiency and dispatch.

This Order shall take effect immediately and shall continue in effect until further orders from this Court.

2 October 1995.

(SGD.) FLORENTINO P. FELICIANO

Acting Chief Justice


WTO Document Reference
IP/N/1/PHL/2
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. PH038