About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Reply of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Issues Related to Phonograms and Audiovisual Fixation in Criminal Cases of Copyright Infringement, China

Interpretation No. 12 of 2005

Back
Latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 2005 Dates Entry into force: October 18, 2005 Promulgated: October 13, 2005 Adopted: September 26, 2005 Type of Text Implementing Rules/Regulations Subject Matter Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights)

Available Materials

Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) Chinese 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理侵犯著作权刑事案件中涉及录音录像制品有关问题的批复         English Reply of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Issues Related to Phonograms and Audiovisual Fixation in Criminal Cases of Copyright Infringement         
 
Download PDF open_in_new
 Reply of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate about Relevant Issues of Handling Criminal Cases of Infringing upon Copyright concerning

Reply of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate about Relevant Issues of Handling Criminal Cases of Infringing upon Copyright concerning Audio-visual Fixation Promulgated by Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate on 2005-10-18

The higher people's courts and the people's procuratorates of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, military courts and the military procuratorates of the PLA, the Production and Construction Corps branch of the Higher People's Court of Xinjiang Uigur Autonomous Region and the people's procuratorate of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps: After the issuance of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate about Relevant Issues of Handling Criminal Cases of Infringing upon Copyright concerning Audiovisual Works, some higher people's courts and the people's procuratorates at provincial level have requested instructions about some relevant issues of handling criminal cases of infringing upon copyright concerning audio-visual fixation. Upon deliberation, you are hereby given a reply as follows: Aiming at making profits, the act of duplicating and distributing audiovisual works without the permission of the producers, quantity standard is applicable to the item 2 paragraph 1 and the item 2 paragraph 2 of Article 5 respectively of Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate concerning Some Issues on the Specific Application of Law for Handling Criminal Cases of Infringement upon Intellectual Property Rights. The act of disseminating the audiovisual works to the public without the permission of their producers through information network shall be deemed as a "reproduction and distribution" as prescribed in the Item 3 of Article 217 of the Criminal Law.

Hereby replied.

 
Download PDF open_in_new

最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理侵犯著作权刑事案件中涉及录音录像制品有关问题的批复

2005926日最高人民法院审判委员会 1365次会议、2005923日最高人民检察院第十届检察委员会第39次会议通过,自20051018日起施行) 各省、自治区、直辖市高级人民法院、人民检察院,解放军军事法院、军事检察院,新疆维吾尔自治区高级人民法院生产建设兵团分院、新疆生产建设兵团人民 检察院: 《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》发布以后,部分高级人民法院、省级人民检察院就关于办理侵 犯著作权刑事案件中涉及录音录像制品的有关问题提出请示。经研究,批复如下: 以营利为目的,未经录音录像制作者许可,复制发行其制作的录音录像制品的行为,复制品的数量标准分别适用《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理侵犯 知识产权刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第五条第一款第(二)项、第二款第(二)项的规定。 未经录音录像制作者许可,通过信息网络传播其制作的录音录像制品的行为,应当视为刑法第二百一十七条第(三)项规定的复制发行 此复。


Legislation Implements (1 text(s)) Implements (1 text(s)) Relates to (1 text(s)) Relates to (1 text(s))
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. CN039