About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United Republic of Tanzania

TZ034-j

Back

Tanzania Cigaratte Company Limited v Burundi Tobacco Company Limited and Mastermind Tobacco (Tanzania) Limited, Miscellaneous Commercial Case No. 7 of 2004, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Tanzania Cigaratte Company Limited v Burundi Tobacco Company Limited and Mastermind Tobacco (Tanzania) Limited, Miscellaneous Commercial Case No. 7 of 2004, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Kimaro, J.

Date of Judgment: July 22, 2005

Facts

The applicant, Tanzania Cigarette Company Limited, unsuccessfully applied for registration of a trade mark. The Registrar refused the application on the grounds of similarity between the proposed trade mark and respondent-Burundi Tobacco Limited Company's trade mark, registered on December 17, 1990. Following the Registrar's refusal, the applicant applied for a rectification of the Register by removing Burundi Tobacco Limited Company’s trade mark on the grounds that its registration had expired on December 17, 1997. The applicant contended that although the respondent planned to assign the mark to the interested party, Mastermind Tobacco (Tanzania) Limited, on October 14, 1997, the assignment was void and had no legal effect because of its non-use and abandonment. There was no renewal of the registration of that trade mark within the period prescribed by law.

Holdings

(i) Rights in trade marks held by parties in other companies outside Tanzania have no legal effect in Tanzania.

(ii) To prove abandonment of a trade mark, the intention of the parties must be taken into account.

(iii) The Registrar does not have unfettered discretion to allow renewal of a trade mark after its expiration and the expiration of the one month grace period.

Decision

The evidence on record fully supported the fact that the trade mark was never used in Tanzania by the respondent or the assignee, Mastermind Tobacco, from the trade mark's registration date until the trade mark's expiration. The assignment to the assignee was void because there was no consideration. An assignment of IP made gratis out of love and affection cannot be an enforceable contract, as love and affection are not considerations between corporate entities. The application for rectification of the Register by removing trade mark was granted with costs.